江西财经大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 111-121.

• 法与经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

论数据产权的相互性——从科斯定理再出发

饶传平, 陶斯琦   

  1. 江西财经大学 法学院, 江西 南昌 330013
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-20 出版日期:2025-09-25 发布日期:2025-11-04
  • 通讯作者: 饶传平,江西财经大学教授,法学博士,主要从事数据法学研究,联系方式cprao@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:陶斯琦,江西财经大学博士研究生,主要从事数据法学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“算法营销侵蚀消费者自主选择权的法律规制研究”(24BFX052)

On the Reciprocity of Data Property Rights: A Reexamination of the Coase Theorem

Rao Chuan-ping, Tao Si-qi   

  1. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China
  • Received:2024-12-20 Online:2025-09-25 Published:2025-11-04

摘要: 数据作为新型生产要素,其价值生成过程深度依托于信息系统与现实世界的耦合机制。化解数据产权专有性与数据利用社会性之间的矛盾是数据产权制度构建的关键问题。科斯定理作为产权基础理论,提供的是确权的方法论而非产权制度本身。区分“权利的初始界定”与“权利的重新配置”是产权配置资源的具体方式。相比于传统单边市场的数据交易模式,数据的价值生产具有“信息性”而非“物质性”特征,双边市场中的数据交互是数据流通与价值实现的主导模式。数据产权制度应以构建公平、健康的数据流通生态为目标,实现理论范式从“数据所有权”向“数据使用权”的转变,为行为合法性认定和权利重新配置提供坚实的理论支撑。根据数据产权相互性理论,数据产权应构建利用性权利体系,充分考虑数据本质特性、市场需求演变、行业竞争格局、社会公共利益以及应用场景价值取向等多维因素,科学配置数据处理者、数据来源者与国家之间的权利义务关系。

关键词: 数据产权, 相互性理论, 科斯定理, 数据要素, 双边市场

Abstract: As a novel factor of production, the value generation of data fundamentally relies on the coupling mechanism between information systems and the physical world. Resolving the contradiction between the exclusivity of data property rights and the sociality of data utilization is a key issue in the construction of the data property rights system. While the Coase Theorem provides a methodological foundation for rights determination as a fundamental property theory, it does not prescribe the institutional framework itself. Distinguishing between the initial definition of rights and the reconfiguration of rights is a specific way of allocating resources for property rights. Compared to the traditional one-sided market data trading model, the value production of data has“informational”rather than“material”characteristics, and data exchange in two-sided markets is the dominant mode of data circulation and value realization. The data property rights system should aim to build a fair and healthy data circulation ecosystem, achieve a theoretical paradigm shift from“data ownership”to “data usage rights”, and provide solid theoretical support for the recognition of behavioral legitimacy and the reconfiguration of rights. According to the theory of reciprocity of data property rights, a utilization rights system should be constructed for data property rights, which should take full consideration of the multidimensional factors, such as the essential characteristics of data, market demand evolution, industry competition pattern, social public interests, and application scenario value orientation, and should scientifically allocate the rights and obligations between data processors, data sources, and the state.

Key words: data property rights, the theory of rights reciprocity, the Coase theorem, data elements, two-sided market

中图分类号: