文明史观视阈下中国东南亚学知识生产与范式转型

江西财经大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 102-110.

• 区域国别与东南亚经济 • 上一篇下一篇

文明史观视阈下中国东南亚学知识生产与范式转型

王勇辉

华中师范大学政治与国际关系学院, 湖北武汉 430079

收稿日期:2025-03-15 出版日期:2025-09-25 发布日期:2025-11-04
作者简介:王勇辉,华中师范大学教授,国际政治学博士,主要从事东南亚、印度尼西亚研究,联系方式wyhui0427@163.com。
基金资助:
华中师范大学中央高校重点种子培育项目“东南亚‘一带一路'建设中统筹推进‘三大全球倡议'研究”（CCNU25ZZ221）

Knowledge Production and Paradigm Transformation of Chinese Southeast Asian Studies: From the Perspective of Civilization History

Wang Yong-hui

Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

Received:2025-03-15 Online:2025-09-25 Published:2025-11-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 中国东南亚学的发展,受到以儒家文化为代表的中华文明的驱动,其根源深植于古代的历史土壤。该学科长期秉持“中国中心论”,同时又存在认知的惯性、研究框架和研究方法的单一性,且在理论上长期受西方叙事的影响。随着亚太地区秩序转型,中国对东南亚地区的影响力日益增长,为新增一级学科的区域国别学提供了交叉学科平台,促进了中国东南亚学认识论的转向及知识功能的拓展。在此过程中,该学科的发展不仅体现在对国际视野的拓展,还体现在对本土经验的深入挖掘,并呈现双向互动态势,中国东南亚学知识体系在更广泛的国际视野与本土经验之间寻求动态平衡。在百年未有之大变局下,构建具有中国学派特色的中国东南亚学不仅符合时代需要,更有助于丰富全球东南亚研究的理论框架。

关键词: 儒家文化, 中国东南亚学, 知识生产, 范式转型

Abstract: The development of Southeast Asian studies in China has been driven by the Chinese civilization, which is represented by Confucian culture, with its roots deeply embedded in ancient historical soil. This discipline has long adhered to the“China-centric”perspective, while also exhibiting cognitive inertia, a singular research framework, and methodological uniformity. Simultaneously, Chinese Southeast Asian studies have been theoretically influenced by Western narratives over an extended period. With the transformation of the Asia-Pacific regional order, China's growing influence in Southeast Asia has provided an interdisciplinary platform for the addition of first level disciplines in regional studies, promoting the shift in epistemology and the expansion of knowledge functions in Chinese Southeast Asian studies. During this process, the development of the discipline is not only reflected in the expansion of international perspectives, but also in the in-depth exploration of local experiences, and presents a two-way interactive trend. The knowledge system of Chinese Southeast Asian studies seeks a dynamic balance between a broader international perspective and local experiences. In the context of unprecedented changes, building a Chinese Southeast Asian studies with Chinese characteristics not only meets the needs of the times, but also contributes to enriching the theoretical framework of global Southeast Asian research.

Key words: Confucian culture, Chinese Southeast Asian Studies, Knowledge production, paradigm shift

中图分类号:

G122

王勇辉. 文明史观视阈下中国东南亚学知识生产与范式转型[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2025, 0(5): 102-110.

Wang Yong-hui. Knowledge Production and Paradigm Transformation of Chinese Southeast Asian Studies: From the Perspective of Civilization History[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2025, 0(5): 102-110.

参考文献

[1] 北京大学区域与国别研究院东盟研究课题组, 翟崑. 以东盟学为先行示范点推进中国区域国别学发展[J]. 东南亚研究, 2023, (3): 10-33+153-154.
[2] 骆莲莲,姜雪. “一带一路”倡议下中国大陆的东南亚研究机构综述[J]. 湖南工业大学学报 (社会科学版), 2021, (4): 18-24.
[3] 李文山. 跨学科与东南亚研究的新趋势[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2018.
[4] 梁永佳. 区域国别研究与中国视角——关于“族群”“社区”“文化”的人类学研究[J]. 清华大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2024, (3): 23-35+241-242.
[5] 梁志明. 关于中国东南亚学研究的几个问题[J]. 东南亚研究, 2007, (2): 14-19+49.
[6] 梁志明, 张锡镇, 杨保筠. 面向新世纪的中国东南亚学研究:回顾与展望[J]. 南洋问题研究, 2002, (1): 86-93.
[7] 苏长和. 为什么没有中国的国际关系理论?[J]. 国际观察, 2005, (4): 26-30.
[8] 王赓武. 东南亚史[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2015.
[9] 魏宏. 气候变化与东南亚的可持续发展[M]. 南京:南京大学出版社, 2021.
[10] 吴坚, 钟燕慧.“东南亚学”刍议:知识生产的语境、边界及中国路径[C]// 吴坚, 柯森, 钟燕慧. 东南亚学(第1辑)[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2023.
[11] 吴小安. 区域与国别之间[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2021.
[12] 吴元平. 东南亚的政治与经济[M]. 上海:复旦大学出版社, 2020.
[13] 姚楠. 南天余墨[M]. 沈阳:辽宁大学出版社, 1995.
[14] 张志杰. 东南亚的水资源管理与气候应对[M]. 成都:四川大学出版社, 2022.
[15] 张振江, 张贵集. 建立中国的东南亚学:为什么、凭什么、做什么[J]. 东南亚研究, 2023, (3): 1-9+153.
[16] Acharya A.Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order (3rd ed.)[M]. London: Routledge, 2009.
[17] Chong A.Culture as a perspective on Southeast Asian politics and international relations[J]. Contemporary Southeast Asia: The Politics of Change, Contestation, and Adaptation, 2017: 111.
[18] Beeson M.Regionalism and globalization in East Asia: Politics, security and economic development[M]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
[19] Beeson M.Rethinking regionalism: Europe and East Asia in comparative historical perspective[J]. Journal of European public policy, 2005, 12(6): 969-985.
[20] Hall D G E. A history of Southeast Asia[M]. London: Macmillan, 1955.
[21] Fisher-Onar N, Kavalski E. From trans-Atlantic order to afro-Eur-Asian worlds? Reimagining international relations as interlocking regional worlds[J]. Global studies quarterly, 2022, 2(4): ksac080.
[22] Hill H, Menon J.ASEAN economic integration: Features, fulfillments, failures and the future[R]. No. 69. Asian Development Bank, 2010.
[23] Katzenstein P J.Cultural norms and national security: Police and military in postwar Japan[M]. Ithaca (N.Y.): Cornell University Press, 1998.
[24] Lim L.Engaging the social in Southeast Asian studies: The role of social movements and civil society[M]. London: Routledge, 2020.
[25] Mahbubani K.Has China won? The Chinese challenge to American primacy[M]. New York: PublicAffairs, 2020.
[26] Nicholas T.The Cambridge history of southeast Asia[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[27] Osborne M.Southeast Asia: An introductory history[M]. Crows Nest (N.S.W.): Allen & Unwin, 2004.
[28] Schmidt B C.The political discourse of anarchy: A disciplinary history of international relations[M]. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998.
[29] Shambaugh D L.China goes global: The partial power[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.

文明史观视阈下中国东南亚学知识生产与范式转型

Knowledge Production and Paradigm Transformation of Chinese Southeast Asian Studies: From the Perspective of Civilization History

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价