江西财经大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 122-136.

• 法与经济 • 上一篇    

大湾区在线争议解决管理模式:欧美经验与跨境协同

陈晖   

  1. 汕头大学 法学院, 广东 汕头 515000
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-12 出版日期:2025-09-25 发布日期:2025-11-04
  • 作者简介:陈晖,汕头大学讲师,博士,主要从事争端解决与世界贸易组织法研究,联系方式chenm3312@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    广东省哲学社会科学规划项目 “粤港澳大湾区跨境在线争议解决的立法与管理模式”(GD24YFX06); 汕头大学科研启动经费项目 “粤港澳大湾区在线争议解决的规则融合”(STF23025T)

Online Dispute Resolution Management Model in the Greater Bay Area: European and American Experiences and Cross-Border Collaboration

Chen Hui   

  1. Shantou University, Shantou 515000, China
  • Received:2024-12-12 Online:2025-09-25 Published:2025-11-04

摘要: 粤港澳大湾区在线争议解决(ODR)协同管理模式的构建,旨在适应大湾区数字经济转型和争议解决多元化的需求。通过比较分析美国行业自治模式与欧盟政府干预模式的优劣,结合“优先推进区域协作”的精神,建议建立融合政府干预与行业自治优势的跨境协同管理模式。首先,行业自治模式虽能激发市场创新活力,但缺乏统一的行业规范和公信力,而政府干预模式虽能提供标准化规范,却可能滞后于市场需求;其次,大湾区面临专项立法缺失、民众对ODR信任度不足以及配套机制不完善等难题,无法照搬欧美模式解决问题;再其次,在借鉴欧美经验的基础上,三地应通过“透明化程序”和“机构认证”等措施开展公信力建设,采用“双轨制”管理ODR服务提供者释放机构创新动力,利用线上协作平台推进线上数据与资源互通配套制度;最后,大湾区应通过三地法律部门联席会议建立统一的ODR行业标准,指引地方跨境协同推出专项立法,并调动三地争议解决机构共建配套机制,进而为全国性推广与区域协作提供制度创新经验。

关键词: 大湾区, 在线争议解决(ODR), 跨境, 法律服务

Abstract: The construction of a collaborative management model for cross-border online dispute resolution (ODR) in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area aims to meet the needs of digital economic transformation and diversified dispute resolution in the Greater Bay Area. By comparing and analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the US industry autonomy model and the EU government intervention model, combined with the spirit of“prioritizing regional cooperation”, a cross-border collaborative management model that integrates the advantages of government intervention and industry autonomy is proposed. Firstly, although the industry autonomy model can stimulate market innovation vitality, it lacks unified industry norms and credibility; while the government intervention model can provide standardized norms, it may lag behind market demand. Secondly, the Greater Bay Area faces challenges such as a lack of specialized legislation, insufficient public trust in ODR, and incomplete supporting mechanisms, making it difficult to simply adopt the European and American models to solve problems. Furthermore, based on the experiences of Europe and America, the three regions should carry out credibility building through measures such as“transparency procedures”and“institutional certification”, adopt a“dual track system”to manage ODR service providers and unleash institutional innovation power, and use online collaboration platforms to promote online data and resource exchange supporting systems. Finally, the Greater Bay Area should establish a unified ODR industry standard through a joint meeting of the legal departments of the three regions, guide local cross-border collaboration to introduce special legislation, and mobilize dispute resolution institutions in the three regions to jointly build supporting mechanisms, thereby providing institutional innovation experience for national promotion and regional cooperation.

Key words: Greater Bay Area, online dispute resolution (ODR), cross border, legal services

中图分类号: