江西财经大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 111-122.

• 法与经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

行政解释权主导下增值税抵扣权运行困境的纾解

褚睿刚   

  1. 首都经济贸易大学 法学院,北京 100070
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-31 修回日期:2025-04-10 出版日期:2025-05-25 发布日期:2025-09-17
  • 作者简介:褚睿刚,首都经济贸易大学副教授,法学博士,主要从事经济法、财税法研究,联系方式churuigang@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目“企业数据资产价值释放法律保障机制研究”(L24ZD018)

Relief of the Operational Difficulties of VAT Deduction Rights under the Guidance of Administrative Interpretation Power

Chu Rui-gang   

  1. Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China
  • Received:2024-12-31 Revised:2025-04-10 Online:2025-05-25 Published:2025-09-17

摘要: 抵扣权是增值税纳税人享有的核心权利,遵循独特的限制式运行模式,通常采取“一般允许抵扣规则+例外限制规则”的立法结构,并由例外限制规则实际框定抵扣权的运行轨迹。纵然基于生存权保障、稽征经济与预防打击逃税等立法目标,国家可以在纳税人行使抵扣权的过程中施加必要限制,但应当将限制举措控制在适度范围之内。中国税法场域表现行政解释权主导的法制运行样态,财政部、国家税务总局作为财税主管部门通过高频次制定财税规范性文件为纳税人的抵扣权添加限制措施,导致抵扣权限制规则过多、限制规则缺乏确定性、部分限制措施正当性存疑等困境。此种税收行政解释权的扩张,既有管理治税观的桎梏,又有外部限制的功能不彰,还有程序理性的不足。对此,可从实体调适、程序完善与事后监督三个维度予以纾解,以税收治理观为指引、法律原则为工具,优化免税、发票形式抵扣等实体法规则,完善财税规范性文件制定的双审制,健全文件制定中与实施后的双层级审查体系。

关键词: 抵扣权, 行政解释权, 权利限制, 财税规范性文件

Abstract: The right of deduction is a core right enjoyed by taxpayers of value-added tax, which follows a unique restrictive operation mode. It usually adopts a legislative structure of “general allowable deduction rules + exceptional restriction rules”, and the actual operation trajectory of the right of deduction is defined by the exceptional restriction rules. Although the state may impose necessary restrictions on taxpayers’ exercise of deduction rights based on the legislative goals such as safeguarding the right to survival, economic taxation, and preventing tax evasion, the restriction measures should be kept within a moderate range. The Chinese tax law field exhibits a legal operation pattern dominated by the administrative interpretation power. The Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation, as the competent financial and tax authorities, frequently formulate financial and tax normative documents to add restrictive measures to taxpayers’ deduction rights, resulting in too many restrictive rules, lack of certainty in restrictive rules, and doubts about the legitimacy of some restrictive measures. The expansion of this tax administrative interpretation power is constrained by the management and taxation concept, as well as the lack of external restrictions and procedural rationality. In this regard, relief can be provided from three dimensions: entity adjustment, procedural improvement, and post supervision. Guided by the concept of tax governance and using legal principles as tools, we can optimize substantive legal rules such as tax exemption and invoice deduction, improve the dual review system for the formulation of financial and tax normative documents, and establish a two-level review system for document formulation and implementation.

Key words: deduction rights, administrative interpretation power, excessive restriction tax, normative documents

中图分类号: