江西财经大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 123-136.

• 书评 • 上一篇    

民事审判监督程序的制度完善路径研究

熊进光, 贾珺   

  1. 江西财经大学 法学院,江西 南昌 330013
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-20 修回日期:2025-04-07 出版日期:2025-05-25 发布日期:2025-09-17
  • 通讯作者: 贾珺,江西财经大学博士研究生,主要从事民商法、诉讼法研究,联系方式37981467@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:熊进光,江西财经大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事侵权行为法、金融证券法研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目“民事再审补充性原则研究”(24BFX104); 江西省社会科学“十四五”重点基金项目“元宇宙背景下虚拟数字人侵权法律问题研究”(23FX01)

Research on the Institutional Improvement Path of Civil Trial Supervision Procedure

Xiong Jin-guang, Jia Jun   

  1. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China
  • Received:2025-01-20 Revised:2025-04-07 Online:2025-05-25 Published:2025-09-17

摘要: 民事审判监督实践中存在的程序空转问题,不仅增加了当事人的负担,也对司法权威和公信力构成了挑战。通过对民事案件和民事审判监督案件的司法统计数据的分析,发现该问题的根源在于多重价值取向失衡致使审判监督制度运行偏差,程序运行不畅导致案件频陷再审循环困局,以及再审入口宽松化助长当事人权利滥用等。为有效应对这一挑战,有必要促使民事审判监督制度的理念回归与价值矫正,并通过建立立审合一制度、完善民事再审案件发回重审程序、严格限制启动再审程序的次数等,优化民事审判监督程序,从而提高司法效率和公正性。同时,构建诉内衍生案件的防范机制和另案处理滥用的矫正机制,以及涉诉信访与再审申请之间的衔接机制,避免司法资源的无谓消耗。此外,还需结合裁判前端、中端和末端治理措施,搭建涵盖预防、监督和纠正的“三位一体”框架,形成完整的程序空转防范与治理体系。创新延伸审判监督职能,编织跨领域的矛盾纠纷化解网,以期增强人民群众的司法获得感与满意度。

关键词: 民事审判, 程序空转, 再审理念, 审判监督

Abstract: The problem of procedural idleness in the practice of civil trial supervision not only increases the burden on the parties involved, but also poses a challenge to judicial authority and credibility. Through the analysis of judicial statistical data on civil cases and civil trial supervision cases, it is found that the root cause of this problem lies in the imbalance of multiple value orientations that leads to deviations in the operation of the trial supervision system, the poor procedural operation that leads to frequent cases falling into the dilemma of retrial cycle, and the relaxation of retrial entry that leads to the abuse of parties’ rights. To effectively address this challenge, it is necessary to promote the return of the concept and value correction of the civil trial supervision system, optimize the civil trial supervision procedure by establishing a unified system of integrating case filing and trial, improving the procedure for remanding civil retrial cases for retrial, strictly limiting the number of times the retrial procedure can be initiated, and optimizing the supervision procedure for civil trials, thereby improving judicial efficiency and fairness. At the same time, it is necessary to establish a prevention mechanism for derivative cases within the lawsuit and a correction mechanism for handling abuse in another case, as well as a linkage mechanism between litigation related petitions and retrial applications, so as to avoid unnecessary consumption of judicial resources. In addition, it is necessary to establish a “three in one” framework that covers prevention, supervision, and correction by combining the front-end, the back-end, and the end of court governance measures, so as to form a complete system for preventing and managing procedural idleness. Finally, it is required to innovatively extend the function of trial supervision and weave a cross disciplinary network for resolving conflicts and disputes, in order to enhance the people’s sense of judicial gain and satisfaction.

Key words: civil trial, procedural idling, retrial concept, trial supervision

中图分类号: