基于长寿风险的城镇养老保险偿付能力评估

江西财经大学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 71-84.

基于长寿风险的城镇养老保险偿付能力评估

谢琳

中国社会科学院人口与劳动经济系,北京 100028

收稿日期:2019-08-24 出版日期:2020-01-25 发布日期:2020-12-14
作者简介:谢琳,中国社会科学院博士研究生,主要从事劳动经济学与保险学研究,联系方式xielin2015@126.com。

Evaluation of the Solvency of Urban Pension Insurance Based on Longevity Risks

XIE Lin

Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100028, China

Received:2019-08-24 Online:2020-01-25 Published:2020-12-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 伴随人口老龄化的加速发展,长寿风险对当前养老金体系产生极为不利的影响。为准确评估长寿风险背景下城镇职工基本养老保险偿付能力状况,基于有限数据的双随机Lee-Carter模型构建全因素区间估计方法,并以此度量长寿风险,再通过建立偿付能力评估模型,对2018—2050年现行制度持续运行下的偿付能力进行评估,然后将延迟退休年龄改革方案纳入到偿付能力评估模型中,全面考察我国城镇职工基本养老保险所面临的偿付能力状况。

关键词: 长寿风险, 城镇职工基本养老保险, 偿付能力评估, Lee-Carter模型

Abstract: With the fast development of the aging population, the longevity risks exert great adverse impacts on the current pension system. In order to accurately assess the solvency status of urban employees' basic pension insurance in the context of longevity risks, this paper constructs a full-factor interval estimation method based on the double-randomized Lee-Carter model of finite data and measures the longevity risks. Then by establishing a solvency assessment model, it evaluates the solvency under the ongoing operation of the current system from 2018 to 2050. After that, it incorporates the reform scheme for delaying the retirement age into the solvency assessment model to examine comprehensively the solvency conditions of China's basic pension insurance for urban employees, the purpose is to provide guidance and suggestions for the urban employees' basic pension insurance in China to keep a long-term healthy and sustainable development.

Key words: longevity risk, basic endowment Insurance for urban employees, solvency evaluation, Lee-Carter Model

中图分类号:

F840.612

谢琳. 基于长寿风险的城镇养老保险偿付能力评估[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2020, 0(1): 71-84.

XIE Lin. Evaluation of the Solvency of Urban Pension Insurance Based on Longevity Risks[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2020, 0(1): 71-84.

参考文献

[1] Macminn R., Brockett P., Blake D.Longevity Risk and Capital Markets[J]. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2006, 73(4): 551-557.
[2] Brunner G., Hinz R., Rocha R.Risk-based Supervision of Pension Funds: A Review of International Experience and Preliminary Assessment of the First Outcomes[R]. Policy Research Working Paper Series, World Bank, 2008.
[3] Cairns A.J. G., Blake D., Dowd K. A Two-Factor Model for Stochastic Mortality with Parameter Uncertainty: Theory and Calibration[J]. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2006, 73(4): 687-718.
[4] Richards S.J., Currie I. D. The Importance of Year of Birth in Two-Dimensional Mortality Data[J]. British Actuarial Journal, 2006, 12(1): 5-38.
[5] Antolin P.Longevity Risk and Private Pensions[R]. OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions, 2007.
[6] Olivieri A.Uncertainty in Mortality Projections: An Actuarial Perspective[J]. Insurance Mathematics and Economics, 2001, 29(2): 231-245.
[7] Olivieri A., Pitacco E.Solvency Requirements for Pension Annuities[J]. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 2003, 2(2): 127-157.
[8] Dowd K., Blake D., Cairns A.J. G., et al. Survivor Swaps[J]. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2006, 73(1): 1-17.
[9] Börger M.Deterministic Shock vs. Stochastic Value-at-Risk--An Analysis of the Solvency II Standard Model Approach to Longevity Risk[J]. Blätter der DGVFM, 2010, 31(2): 225-259.
[10] Belles-Sampera J., Guillén M., Santolino M.Beyond Value-at-Risk: GlueVaR Distortion Risk Measures[J]. Risk Analysis, 2014, 34(1): 121-134.
[11] Bouchet M.The Sustainability of the Private Sector Pension System from a Long-Term Perspective: the Case of Luxembourg[R]. BCL Working Papers, Central Bank of Luxembourg, 2003.
[12] Blake D., Mayhew L.On the Sustainability of the UK State Pension System in the Light of Population Ageing and Declining Fertility[J]. The Economic Journal, 2006, 116(6): 286-305.
[13] Jimeno J.F., Rojas J. A., Puente S. Modelling the Impact of Aging on Social Security Expenditures[J]. Economic Modelling, 2008, 25(2): 201-224.
[14] Santos T., Domínguez-Fabián I.Financial Solvency of Pension Systems in the European Union[J]. Ecomod, 2011: 1971-1977.
[15] 金博轶. 动态死亡率建模与年金产品长寿风险的度量——基于有限数据条件下的贝叶斯方法[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2012, (12): 124-135.
[16] 祝伟, 陈秉正. 动态死亡率下个人年金的长寿风险分析[J]. 保险研究,2012, (2): 21-28.
[17] 刘学良. 中国养老保险的收支缺口和可持续性研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014, (9): 25-37.
[18] 王晓军, 赵明. 中国高龄人口死亡率随机波动趋势分析[J]. 统计研究, 2014, (9): 51-57.
[19] 段白鸽, 石磊. 中国高龄人口死亡率的动态演变——基于年份、城镇乡、性别的分层建模视角[J]. 人口研究, 2015, (4): 3-18.
[20] 王晓军, 姜增明. 长寿风险对城镇职工养老保险的冲击效应研究[J]. 统计研究,2016, (5): 43-50.
[21] 封铁英,罗天恒. 农村社会养老保险的长寿风险评估与应对策略[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(3):73-79.
[22] Bell W.R. Comparing and Assessing Time Series Methods for Forecasting Age-Specific Fertility and Mortality Rates[J]. Journal of Official Statistics, 1997, 13(3): 279-303.
[23] Pitacco E., Denuit M., Haberman S., et al.Modeling Longevity Dynamics for Pensions and Annuity Business[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
[24] Alho J.M., Houlgard S. E., Lassila J. Uncertain Demographics and Fiscal Sustainability[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[25] Bisetti E., Favero C.A. Measuring the Impact of Longevity Risk on Pension Systems: The Case of Italy[J]. North American Actuarial Journal, 2014, 18(1): 87-103.
[26] 马骏, 张晓蓉, 李治国, 等. 中国国家资产负债表研究[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2012.
[27] Holzmann R., Robalino D.A., Takayama N. Closing the Coverage Gap: Role of Social Pensions and Other Retirement Income Transfers[M]. Washington: World Bank Publications, 2009.
[28] 王晓军, 米海杰. 养老金支付缺口:口径、方法与测算分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2013, (10): 49-62.