当代财经 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 72-85.

• 公共经济与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

专项债券治理的责任意涵、问题阐释与路径优化

姚艳萍   

  1. 中山大学 法学院,广东 广州 510275
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-03 修回日期:2025-12-23 出版日期:2026-02-15 发布日期:2026-01-30
  • 作者简介:姚艳萍,中山大学博士研究生,主要从事财税法学研究,联系方式 2665903557@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“新发展阶段促进共同富裕的税法保障研究”(22BFX090)

The Responsibility Implication, Problem Revelation and Path Optimization of Special Bond Governance

Yao Yan-ping   

  1. Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • Received:2025-04-03 Revised:2025-12-23 Online:2026-02-15 Published:2026-01-30

摘要: 专项债券是逆周期调节的重要工具,能有效地拓宽政府融资渠道、扩大有效投资、推动地方经济发展。专项债券的运行应防控职责混淆与治理不力造成的债务风险。党的二十届三中全会要求“完善政府债务管理制度”。专项债券应统筹发展和安全进行责任治理,注重以责分治、以责规权、以责促治的责任意涵。目前专项债券治理存在偿还债务的责任主体不明、内部债务的违约责任过轻、项目的监管责任不到位的问题。专项债券治理需要实现从权力本位到责任本位的治理逻辑转向,其治理效能提升须回归到对举债底层逻辑的遵从,并在保障债权人权利与强化民主监督方面硬化约束。在此指引下,各级政府实行问责制。明确市县级政府承担债务偿还责任、省级政府履行指导和监督职责的角色担当,落实动态督促与回应机制,技术赋能违规问责追究。同时,在社会层面进行协同共治。压实专业机构以保护投资者为目的的“看门人”责任,通过人大调查制度发挥民众社会监督作用。唯有如此,地方政府方能构建与高质量发展相适应的债务管理机制,实现专项债券治理体系和治理能力的有效提升。

关键词: 地方政府债务, 专项债券治理, 专项债券风险, 责任意涵, 问责制

Abstract: Special bonds are an important tool for counter cyclical regulation, which can effectively broaden government financing channels, expand effective investment, and promote local economic development. The operation of special bonds should prevent and control debt risks caused by confusion of responsibilities and ineffective governance. The Third Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China called for the improvement of the government debt management system. Special bonds should be managed with a coordinated approach to development and safety, emphasizing the responsibility implications of dividing responsibilities, regulating rights with responsibilities, and promoting governance with responsibilities. At present, there are some problems in the governance of special bonds, such as unclear responsibility for debt repayment, too light responsibility for internal debt default, and inadequate responsibility for project supervision. The governance of special bonds needs to shift from a power based to a responsibility based governance logic, its governance efficiency improvement must return to compliance with the underlying logic of borrowing, and harden constraints in safeguarding creditors’ rights and reinforcing democratic supervision. Under this guidance, all levels of government implement an accountability system: clarify the role of municipal and county governments in assuming debt repayment responsibilities and provincial governments in performing guidance and supervision responsibilities, implement a dynamic supervision and response mechanism, and strengthen accountability for violations through technology. At the same time, collaborative governance should be carried out at the social level. The“gatekeeper”responsibility of professional institutions should be strengthened with the aim of protecting investors, and the public’s social supervision role should be leveraged through the investigation system of the National People’s Congress. Only in this way can local governments establish debt management mechanisms that are compatible with high-quality development, and effectively enhance the governance system and capacity of special bonds.

Key words: local government debt, special bond governance, special bond risk, responsibility implication, accountability system

中图分类号: