当代财经 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6): 58-71.

• 现代金融 • 上一篇    下一篇

重要性、脆弱性识别与系统性金融风险传染效应研究

刘超, 李钰颖   

  1. 北京工业大学 经济与管理学院,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-28 修回日期:2025-04-22 出版日期:2025-06-15 发布日期:2025-06-17
  • 通讯作者: 刘超,北京工业大学教授,博士生导师,管理学博士,主要从事社会经济系统分析与优化研究,联系方式liuchao@bjut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李钰颖,北京工业大学博士研究生,主要从事社会经济系统分析与优化研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目“多源异构数据下金融有效支持‘专精特新’企业发展的机制、路径与策略”(72372003)

Research on the Identification of Importance and Vulnerability and the Contagion Effect of Systemic Financial Risks

Liu Chao, Li Yu-ying   

  1. Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2024-08-28 Revised:2025-04-22 Online:2025-06-15 Published:2025-06-17

摘要: 金融的本质是服务实体经济。随着金融与实体行业关联的复杂性提高,防范化解系统性金融风险的难度增大。基于此,构建内生银企信贷网络风险传染模型,以2013—2022年上市企业为研究样本,识别“金融—实体”双维度下系统重要性与脆弱性,并评估异质性所有权银行与实体行业在系统性金融风险跨机构、跨行业、跨部门传染中的作用,为防范化解系统性金融风险提供微观新视角。研究发现:第一,国有银行和股份制银行具有较强的重要性,而城市商业银行和农村商业银行呈现较高的脆弱性;第二,传染性越强的银行和实体行业被感染性也越强,风险整体呈现“螺旋式积累上升”的特征;第三,实体行业与异质性所有权银行的系统性金融风险跨部门传染具有“正向同序、反向异序”的非对称效应;第四,2020年以来,银行部门对系统性金融风险的影响低于50%,实体部门在系统性金融风险中的重要性上升。因此,在防范系统性金融风险的过程中,要重视银行所有权性质差异,关注风险吸收与传染的正反馈机制,注重风险反向传染的异序性,并将实体部门纳入系统性金融风险的监管范畴。

关键词: 系统性金融风险, 系统重要性, 脆弱性识别, 风险传染

Abstract: The purpose of finance is to serve the real economy. As the complexity of the relationship between finance and real industries increases, it is more difficult to prevent and resolve systemic financial risks. For this regard, this paper builds an endogenous bank-enterprise credit network risk contagion model, takes the listed enterprises from 2013 to 2022 as research samples, identifies the systemic importance and vulnerability under the“finance-entity”dual dimension, and evaluates the role of the banks and the entity industry with heterogeneous ownership in the cross-institutional, cross-industry and cross-sector contagion of systemic financial risks, so as to provide a new micro perspective for preventing and solving systemic financial risks. The findings are as follows: first, state-owned banks and joint-stock banks are of great importance, while urban commercial banks and rural commercial banks show high vulnerability. Second, the stronger the contagion and infectivity of banks and physical industries, the stronger their susceptibility to infection, showing the overall “spiral accumulation rise”characteristics. Thirdly, the cross sectoral transmission of systemic financial risks between physical industries and heterogeneous ownership banks exhibits an asymmetric effect of “positive same order, reverse different order”. Fourthly, since 2020, the impact of the banking sector on systemic financial risk has been less than 50%, and the importance of the physical sector in systemic financial risk has increased. Therefore, in the process of preventing systemic financial risks, it is necessary to attach importance to the differences in the ownership of banks, pay attention to the positive feedback mechanism between risk absorption and contagion, focus on the disorder of reverse contagion of risks, and include the real sector in the scope of supervision of systemic financial risks.

Key words: systemic financial risk, systemic importance, vulnerability identification, risk contagion

中图分类号: