创新工作沉浸的二元认知机制：自我决定的视角

当代财经 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 88-100.

创新工作沉浸的二元认知机制：自我决定的视角

熊立^a, 熊天任^b

江西财经大学 a.工商管理学院; b.智慧企业研究中心,江西南昌 330032

收稿日期:2019-09-24 修回日期:2020-02-24 出版日期:2020-04-15 发布日期:2020-12-11
通讯作者: 熊天任,江西财经大学智慧企业研究中心研究人员,主要从事人力资源管理研究,联系方式xtr1997@126.com。
作者简介:熊立,江西财经大学副教授,博士,主要从事组织与人力资源管理研究
基金资助:
江西省高校人文社科研究项目“江西高校科研人员工作沉浸感测度及其内生机制：二元性的认知视角”（GL18202）

The Binary Cognitive Mechanism of Innovation-Related Work Immersing: A Self-Determination Perspective

XIONG Li, XIONG Tian-ren

Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330032, China

Received:2019-09-24 Revised:2020-02-24 Online:2020-04-15 Published:2020-12-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 工作沉浸是表现为专注、享乐和内在动机的积极工作状态,能显著提升创新人员的创造力。主流研究认为,沉浸感是在挑战和技能达到平衡时产生的,但一直缺乏关于人们如何主动实现挑战—技能平衡的解释。基于自我决定理论,尝试通过认知二元性来理解挑战—技能平衡以及工作沉浸产生的根本原因,并考察工作环境中外在动机的影响。通过对238名科研创新人员的问卷调查及回归分析发现：善于均衡调节探索式与开发式创新的二元心智模式对工作沉浸产生积极影响,挑战—技能平衡发挥着显著的中介作用,职业认同产生正向调节作用,主管的控制型监管行为产生负向调节作用,并且职业认同能缓冲控制型监管行为的负向作用。

关键词: 工作沉浸, 二元心智模式, 挑战—技能平衡, 职业认同, 控制型监管行为

Abstract: Work immersing is a positive work state characterized by absorption, enjoyment and intrinsic motivation, which can significantly improve the creativity of innovative employees. The mainstream researches believe that work immersion is realized through a condition of challenge-skill balance, but how can challenge-skill balance be actively achieved by an individual remains unclear. Based on self-determination theory, this paper tries to explore the fundamental reason that leads to challenge-skill balance and work immersing through the cognitive duality. Meanwhile it also investigates the influences of some extrinsic motivators at workplace. Based on questionnaire survey of 238 scientific innovators and a regression analysis, it is found that the binary mental model which is good at balancing individual's explorative and exploitative innovation can also exert active influence on work immersing, that the challenge-skill balance can play a significant role of mediator, that professional identity acts as a positive moderator, that the controlling supervision of managers can play a role of negative moderator, and that the negative effect of controlling supervision is buffered and controlled by the effect of professional identity.

Key words: work immersing, binary mental model, challenge-skill balance, professional identity, controlling supervision

中图分类号:

F270

熊立, 熊天任. 创新工作沉浸的二元认知机制：自我决定的视角[J]. 当代财经, 2020, 0(4): 88-100.

XIONG Li, XIONG Tian-ren. The Binary Cognitive Mechanism of Innovation-Related Work Immersing: A Self-Determination Perspective[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2020, 0(4): 88-100.

参考文献

[1] Nielsen K., Cleal B.Predicting Flow at Work: Investigating the Activities and Job Characteristics That Predict Flow States at Work[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2010, 15(2): 180-190.
[2] Csikszentmihalyi M.Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience[M]. New York: Harper and Row, 1990.
[3] Zubair A., Kamal A. Work Related Flow, Psychological Capital,Creativity among Employees of Software Houses[J]. Psychological Studies, 2015, 60(3): 321-331.
[4] 王忠,齐涛,邵金虎. IT企业知识员工玩趣人格对其创新行为的影响——工作沉浸的中介作用与职业承诺的调节作用[J]. 软科学, 2017,(5):90-93.
[5] Bakker A.B. The Work-Related Flow Inventory: Construction and Initial Validation of the WOLF[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2008, 72(3): 400-414.
[6] Løvoll H.S., Vitters J. Can Balance Be Boring? A Critique of the“Challenges Should Match Skills”Hypotheses in Flow Theory[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2014, 115(1): 117-136.
[7] Fong C.J., Zaleski D. J., Leach J. K. The Challenge-Skill Balance and Antecedents of Flow: A Meta-Analytic Investigation[J]. Journal of Positive Psychology, 2015, 10(5): 425-446.
[8] Bakker A.B., Woerkom M. V. Flow at Work: A Self-Determination Perspective[J]. Occupational Health Science, 2017, (1): 1-19.
[9] 章凯,林丛丛. 员工幸福感的心理目标实现进程说[J]. 管理学报,2018,(6):818-826.
[10] Kauppilla O.P., Tempelaar M. P. The Social Cognitive Underpinnings of Employees' Ambidextrous Behavior and the Supportive Role of Group Managers' Leadership[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2016, 53(6): 1019-1044.
[11] 曹元坤,熊立. 中国企业员工创新的二元心智模式构念与测量[J]. 当代财经,2017,(5):69-78
[12] Ilies R., Wagner D., Wilson K., Ceja L., Johnson M., Derue S., Ilgen D.Flow at Work and Basic Psychological Needs: Effects on Well-Being[J]. Applied Psychology, 2017, 66(1): 4-24.
[13] Beard K.S., Hoy W. K. The Nature, Meaning, and Measure of Teacher Flow in Elementary Schools: A Test of Rival Hypotheses[J]. Educational Administration Quarterly, 2010, 46(3): 426-458.
[14] Salanova M., Bakker A.B., Llorens S. Flow at Work: Evidence for an Upward Spiral of Personal and Organizational Resources[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2006, 7(1): 1-22.
[15] Senge P.M. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization[M]. 2^nd ed. USA: Currency, 2006.
[16] Pineau T.R., Glass C. R., Kaufman K. A., Bernal D. Self- and Team-Efficacy Beliefs of Rowers and Their Relation to Mindfulness and Flow[J]. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 2014, 8(2): 142-158.
[17] Ford T.G., Van S. M. E., Clark L. V., Fazio-Brunson M., Schween D. C. Teacher Self-Efficacy, Professional Commitment, and High-Stakes Teacher Evaluation Policy in Louisiana[J]. Educational Policy, 2017, 31(2): 202-248.
[18] Yan Y., Davison R.M., Mo C. Employee Creativity Formation: The Roles of Knowledge Seeking, Knowledge Contributing and Flow Experience in Web 2.0 Virtual Communities[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29(5): 1923-1932.
[19] 郭睿. 内隐认知:沉浸式语言教学的主要认知机制[J]. 语言教学与研究,2015,(5):12-21.
[20] Birkinshaw J., Gupta K.Clarifying the Distinctive Contribution of Ambidexterity to the Field of Organization Studies[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2013, 27(4): 287-298.
[21] Amabile T.M. Motivational Synergy: Towards New Conceptualization of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in the Workplace[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 1993, 3(3): 185-201.
[22] Nickel J., Zimmer J.Professional Identity in Graduating Teacher Candidates[J]. Teaching Education, 2018, (2): 1-15.
[23] 李志成,祝养浩,占小军. 创造力与职场不文明行为——基于自我损耗理论的视角[J]. 当代财经,2019,(9):72-81.
[24] Kuvaas B., Buch R., Weibel A., Dysvik A., Nerstad C.G. L. Do Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation Relate Differently to Employee Outcomes?[J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2017, 61(Aug): 244-258.
[25] 贺妍秋. 监管风格、工作满意度对员工工作旺盛感的影响分析[D]. 成都:西南财经大学,2016.
[26] Boehe D.M. Supervisory Styles: A Contingency Framework[J]. Studies in Higher Education, 2016, 41(3): 399-414.
[27] 李燕萍,洪江鹏,胡翔. 辱虐管理研究前沿综述:新构念与新思路[J]. 华东经济管理,2019,(3):152-163.
[28] Jackson S.A., Marsh H. Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Optimal Experience: The Flow State Scale[J]. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 1996, 18(1): 17-35.
[29] Oldham G.R., Cummings A. Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(3): 607-634.
[30] Tyler D., McCallum R. S. Assessing the Relationship between Competence and Job Role and Identity among Direct Service Counseling Psychologists[J]. Journal of Psycho-Educational Assessment, 1998, 16(2): 135-15.
[31] 任华亮,郑莹,张庆垒. 工作幸福感对员工创新绩效的影响——工作价值观和工作自主性的双重调节[J]. 财经论丛,2019, (3):94-103.
[32] 熊立,曹元坤,朱建斌. 国外个体二元性研究前沿及展望[J]. 管理评论,2018,(4):142-156.