组织污名与中国企业海外市场进入模式选择研究——基于上市公司的实证分析

当代财经 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 77-88.

组织污名与中国企业海外市场进入模式选择研究——基于上市公司的实证分析

张宁宁¹, 杜晓君²

1.山东大学经济学院,山东济南 250100;
2.东北大学工商管理学院,辽宁沈阳 110169

收稿日期:2019-09-24 修回日期:2019-11-15 发布日期:2020-11-03
通讯作者: 张宁宁,山东大学博士研究生,主要从事国际经济与投资、跨国公司理论研究,联系方式nnzhangneu@sina.com
作者简介:杜晓君,东北大学教授,博士生导师,博士,主要从事组织身份、跨国公司理论研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国跨国企业应对‘一带一路’延伸国家政治风险的战略反应研究”（19AGL004）

Research on Organizational Stigma and Choice of Entry Modes of Chinese Enterprises in Overseas Markets: An Empirical Analysis Based on Listed Companies

ZHANG Ning-ning¹, DU Xiao-jun²

1. Shandong University, Jinan 250100;
2. Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China

Received:2019-09-24 Revised:2019-11-15 Published:2020-11-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于组织污名视角并结合组织合法性理论与资源基础观,采用2006—2015年间中国企业对特定东道国首次开展对外直接投资的事件为研究样本,运用Logit回归分析法探究组织污名对中国企业海外市场进入模式选择的影响,并分析母国地区制度环境和企业所有制性质在其中的调节效应。研究结果表明：组织污名对中国企业选择独资模式进入海外市场具有显著的负向影响,即组织污名的存在使得中国企业更倾向于选择合资模式进入东道国市场,而母国地区制度环境强化了两者之间的负相关关系,所有制性质对上述负效应具有弱化作用。

关键词: 组织污名, 合法性门槛, 独资, 合资

Abstract: From the perspective of organizational stigma and based on the organizational legitimacy theory and the resource-based view, this paper adopts the event that Chinese enterprises first carried out outward foreign direct investment during the period of 2006-2015 as the research samples and employs the Logit regression analytical method to explore the influence of organizational stigma on the choice of entry modes of Chinese enterprises in overseas markets. It also analyzes the adjustment effect of home country area system environment and the enterprise ownership nature in that influence. The results show that organizational stigma has a significant negative impact on Chinese enterprises to choose the sole proprietorship mode to enter the overseas markets, namely, the existence of organizational stigma makes Chinese enterprises more inclined to choose joint venture mode to enter the host country market; while the home regional institutional environment strengthens the negative correlation between the two, and the nature of ownership has a weakening effect on the above-mentioned negative effect.

Key words: organizational stigma, threshold of legality, sole proprietorship, joint venture

中图分类号:

F272

张宁宁, 杜晓君. 组织污名与中国企业海外市场进入模式选择研究——基于上市公司的实证分析[J]. 当代财经, 2020, 0(1): 77-88.

ZHANG Ning-ning, DU Xiao-jun. Research on Organizational Stigma and Choice of Entry Modes of Chinese Enterprises in Overseas Markets: An Empirical Analysis Based on Listed Companies[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2020, 0(1): 77-88.

参考文献

[1] 杜晓君,张宁宁. 组织污名对企业国际化绩效的影响[J]. 外国经济与管理,2019,(7):112-124.
[2] 陈怀超,范建红,牛冲槐. 基于制度距离的中国跨国公司进入战略选择:合资还是独资?[J]. 管理评论,2013,(12):98-111.
[3] 吴华,张爱卿,唐擎. 企业社会责任行为会促进组织污名管理吗?——基于归因理论视角[J]. 管理评论,2018,(7):218-230.
[4] 齐朝顺,杜晓君. 政治关联对中国企业国际并购绩效影响研究[J]. 当代财经,2018,(1):70-79.
[5] Xie Q. Firm Age, Marketization, and Entry Mode Choices of Emerging Economy Firms: Evidence from Listed Firms in China[J]. Journal of World Business, 2017, 52(3): 372-385.
[6] 魏江,杨洋. 跨越身份的鸿沟:组织身份不对称与整合战略选择[J]. 管理世界,2018,(6):140-156.
[7] 张斌,徐琳,刘银国. 组织污名研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2013,(3):64-72.
[8] Hudson B.A. Against all Odds: A Consideration of Core-Stigmatized Organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2008, 33(1): 252-266.
[9] Devers C.E., Dewett T., Belsito M. C. A. A General Theory of Organizational Stigma[J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20(1): 154-171.
[10] Tracey P., Phillips N.Managing the Consequences of Organizational Stigmatization: Identity Work in a Social Enterprise[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2016, 59(3): 740-765.
[11] 邓路. 国家形象、交易信任与出口持续时间——来自中国产品层面的证据[J]. 当代财经,2018,(10):16-25.
[12] Yu Y., Liu Y.Country-of-Origin and Social Resistance in Host Countries: The Case of a Chinese Firm[J]. Thunderbird International Business Review, 2016, 60(3): 347-363.
[13] 鲍晓华. 中国是否遭遇了歧视性反倾销?——兼与其他出口国的比较[J]. 管理世界,2011,(3):32-43.
[14] 曾楚红,朱仁宏,李孔岳. 基于战略视角的组织合法性研究[J]. 外国经济与管理,2008,(2):9-15.
[15] Edman J.Reconciling the Advantages and Liabilities of Foreignness: Towards an Identity-based Framework[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2016, 47(6): 674-694.
[16] Pogrebnyakov N., Maitland C.F. Institutional Distance and the Internationalization Process: The Case of Mobile Operators[J]. Journal of International Management, 2011, 17(1): 68-82.
[17] Owens M., Palmer M., Zueva-Owens A.Institutional Forces in Adoption of International Joint Ventures: Empirical Evidence from British Retail Multinationals[J]. International Business Review, 2013, 22(5): 883-893.
[18] Wu S.Z. Institutional Distance and Local Isomorphism Strategy[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2012, 43(4): 343-367.
[19] Makino Y.S. The Choice between Joint Venture and Wholly Owned Subsidiary: An Institutional Perspective[J]. Organization Science, 2002, 13(6): 667-683.
[20] 齐晓飞,关鑫. 中国企业对外直接投资的母国制度解释——基于OFDI-S模型的理论分析[J]. 经济与管理研究,2017,(8):115-123.
[21] 陈冬华,齐祥芹. 地区制度环境与部分民营化绩效--来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 当代会计评论,2010,(1):36-66.
[22] Luo Y.,Tung R. L. A General Theory of Springboard MNEs[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2018, 49(2): 129-152.
[23] Zheng N., Wei Y., Zhang Y., Yang J.In Search of Strategic Assets through Cross-Border Merger and Acquisitions: Evidence from Chinese Multinational Enterprises in Developed Economies[J]. International Business Review, 2016, 25(1): 177-186.
[24] 葛菲,贺小刚. 生产制造还是资本投资?中国工业企业国际创业资本的流向——基于制度距离的解释[J]. 管理世界,2017,(11):112-124.
[25] 任颋,茹璟,尹潇霖. 所有制性质、制度环境与企业跨区域市场进入战略选择[J]. 南开管理评论,2015,(2):51-63.
[26] Cui L., Jiang F.State Ownership Effect on Firms’ FDI Ownership Decisions Under Institutional Pressure: A Study of Chinese Outward-investing Firms[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2012, 43(3): 264-284.
[27] 邓新明,熊会兵,李剑峰,侯俊东,吴锦峰. 政治关联、国际化战略与企业价值——来自中国民营上市公司面板数据的分析[J]. 南开管理评论,2014,(1):26-43.
[28] Tseng C.H., Lee R. P. Host Environmental Uncertainty and Equity-based Entry Mode Dilemma: The Role of Market Linking Capability[J]. International Business Review, 2010, 19(4): 407-418.
[29] 吴小节,谭晓霞,曾华. 母国区域制度质量对民营企业海外市场进入模式的影响[J]. 管理科学,2018,(4):120-134.
[30] Carberry E.J., King B. G. Defensive Practice Adoption in the Face of Organizational Stigma: Impression Management and the Diffusion of Stock Option Expensing[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2012, 49(7): 1137-1167.