当代财经 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (7): 59-71.

• 财政金融 • 上一篇    下一篇

风险缓冲还是风险放大:企业ESG表现与金融市场稳定

邵稚权1, 于渤2   

  1. 1.北京大学 光华管理学院,北京 100871;
    2.辽宁大学 金融与贸易学院,辽宁 沈阳 110136
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-20 修回日期:2026-05-28 出版日期:2026-07-15 发布日期:2026-09-14
  • 通讯作者: 于渤,辽宁大学讲师,经济学博士,主要从事绿色金融与金融监管研究,联系方式cufeyb@163.com。
  • 作者简介:邵稚权,北京大学博士研究生,主要从事资本市场与金融监管研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目“‘稳增长’与‘防风险’双重目标的理论解构、量化评估与政策应对研究”(23CJY036)

Risk Buffer or Risk Amplifier: Corporate ESG Performance and Financial Market Stability

Shao Zhi-quan1, Yu Bo2   

  1. 1. Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
    2. Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China
  • Received:2025-05-20 Revised:2026-05-28 Online:2026-07-15 Published:2026-09-14

摘要: 引导企业践行可持续发展理念,不仅是优化资源配置的重要路径,还是维护金融市场健康与稳定的关键举措。基于颗粒经济学框架整合10家国内外ESG评级机构数据,揭示企业ESG表现对金融市场稳定性的双重影响。研究发现,核心ESG评级的提升有助于降低企业的个体尾部风险,但同时会增强企业与市场之间的系统性关联。机制分析表明,企业合规性提升与财务状况改善是降低个体尾部风险的关键因素,而投资者结构的高度同质化则是增强系统性关联的主要成因。核心ESG评级的提升不仅能够有效传递企业内部治理与财务状况等关键信息,还会吸引更多具有ESG偏好的投资者,从而导致投资者结构趋于同质化。由于评级体系存在差异,国内评级机构强调企业与国家战略的契合度,其主要影响是缓解个体尾部风险;国际评级机构则在增强系统性关联方面的作用更显著。因此,政府在推动企业践行可持续发展理念的同时,应兼顾其对金融市场稳定性的双重影响,以实现经济高质量发展与金融风险防控的有机衔接。

关键词: ESG, 金融市场稳定, 系统性风险, 颗粒经济, 信息溢出

Abstract: Drawing on the granular economics framework, we integrate data from ten Chinese local and international ESG rating agencies to examine the dual effects of corporate ESG performance on financial market stability. We find that higher core ESG ratings reduce firms’ idiosyncratic tail risk while simultaneously strengthening their systemic connectedness with the broader market. Mechanism analyses show that improved corporate compliance and stronger financial conditions are the key channels through which ESG performance mitigates idiosyncratic tail risk, whereas greater homogeneity in investor composition is the primary driver of enhanced systemic connectedness. Improvements in core ESG ratings not only convey salient information about firms’ internal governance and financial position, but also attract ESG-oriented investors, thereby increasing the homogeneity of their investor base. Our findings reveal a clear methodological divergence: domestic ESG rating agencies emphasize firms’ alignment with national development strategies as a substantive manifestation of ESG performance, thereby primarily mitigating idiosyncratic tail risk. By contrast, international rating agencies play a more pronounced role in amplifying systemic connectedness. These findings suggest that, in promoting corporate sustainable development, policymakers should fully consider its dual implications for financial market stability, so as to better reconcile high-quality economic development with financial risk prevention.

Key words: ESG, financial market stability, systemic risk, granular economics, information spillover

中图分类号: