环境信息公开与污染型企业选址

当代财经 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 83-96.

环境信息公开与污染型企业选址

许静林¹, 杨鑫垚², 谭伟杰³, 向为民⁴

1.清华大学五道口金融学院,北京 100083;
2.西南交通大学公共管理与政法学院,四川成都 610031;
3.上海财经大学公共经济与管理学院,上海 200433;
4.重庆工商大学管理科学与工程学院,重庆 400067

收稿日期:2024-06-04 修回日期:2024-12-17 出版日期:2025-01-15 发布日期:2025-02-12
通讯作者: 谭伟杰,上海财经大学博士研究生,主要从事ESG治理研究,联系方式tanwj_1@163.com。
作者简介:许静林,清华大学博士后研究人员,经济学博士,主要从事生态经济与绿色金融研究;杨鑫垚,西南交通大学博士研究生,主要从事生态经济研究;向为民,重庆工商大学教授,管理学博士,主要从事应用经济、房地产金融与管理研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目“大规模减税降费的效应评估与政策优化研究”（20&ZD079）; 国家社会科学基金项目“二元均衡视角下房地产过度金融化及其治理研究”（20BJY072）; 上海财经大学研究生创新基金（CXJJ-2024-334）

Environmental Information Disclosure and Site Selection of Polluting Enterprises

Xu Jing-lin¹, Yang Xin-yao², Tan Wei-jie³, Xiang Wei-min⁴

1. Tsinghua University, Beijing 100083;
2. Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031;
3. Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China;
4. Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China

Received:2024-06-04 Revised:2024-12-17 Online:2025-01-15 Published:2025-02-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 环境规制下的污染企业选址策略一直以来都是社会各界关注的重要问题。以中国环境信息公开政策作为准自然实验,基于2003—2013年270个地级市的新增污染型企业数据,运用双重差分法实证考察了环境信息公开政策对污染型企业选址的影响。研究结果表明,环境信息公开政策抑制了污染型企业的进入。异质性分析结果显示,环境信息公开政策对污染型企业进入的抑制效应在国有、私营及其他污染型企业和东部地区中更为显著。结合宏观与微观数据的双重验证表明,环境信息公开政策主要通过发挥绿色转型驱动效应和污染避难所效应影响污染型企业选址。一方面,政策通过提高公众环保意识降低公众对污染型企业的容纳度;另一方面,政策在减少企业污染排放的同时提高了企业生产成本,促使污染型企业向环境监管洼地迁移。因此,建议政府、社会公众与企业三方协同合作,不断完善具有中国特色的环境治理监管体系,密切关注污染型企业动向,并以合理的环保要求和规范的经营行为作为市场准入原则,以推动经济高质量发展。

关键词: 环境信息公开, 污染型企业选址, 绿色转型, 污染避难所, 企业环境成本

Abstract: The site selection strategy of polluting enterprises under environmental regulations has always been an important issue of concern to all sectors of society. Taking China’s environmental information disclosure policy as a quasi natural experiment, and based on the data from 270 newly added polluting enterprises at prefecture level cities from 2003 to 2013, this paper empirically examines the impact of environmental information disclosure policy on the site selection of polluting enterprises with the difference in differences method. The research results indicate that the policy of environmental information disclosure has suppressed the entry of polluting enterprises. The heterogeneity analysis results show that the inhibitory effect of environmental information disclosure policies on the entry of polluting enterprises is more significant in state-owned, private, and other polluting enterprises, as well as in the eastern region. The dual verification of the macro and micro data shows that the policy of environmental information disclosure mainly affects the site selection of polluting enterprises by leveraging the driving effect of green transformation and the pollution shelter effect. On the one hand, the policies reduce the public’s tolerance for polluting enterprises by raising public environmental awareness; on the other hand, the policies have increased the production costs of enterprises while reducing their pollution emissions, prompting the polluting enterprises to move to environmental regulatory low-lying land. Therefore, it is recommended that the government, the general public, and enterprises work together to continuously improve the environmental governance and regulatory system with Chinese characteristics, closely monitor the trends of polluting enterprises, and use reasonable environmental protection requirements and standardized business practices as market access principles to promote the high-quality economic development.

Key words: environmental information disclosure, site selection for polluting enterprises, green transformation, pollution shelters, enterprise environmental costs

中图分类号:

F532
X322

许静林, 杨鑫垚, 谭伟杰, 向为民. 环境信息公开与污染型企业选址[J]. 当代财经, 2025, 0(1): 83-96.

Xu Jing-lin, Yang Xin-yao, Tan Wei-jie, Xiang Wei-min. Environmental Information Disclosure and Site Selection of Polluting Enterprises[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2025, 0(1): 83-96.

参考文献

白俊红, 张艺璇, 卞元超. 创新驱动政策是否提升城市创业活跃度——来自国家创新型城市试点政策的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济,2022, (6): 61-78.
蔡宏波,钟超,韩金镕.交通基础设施升级与污染型企业选址[J].中国工业经济,2021,(10):136-155.
程艳, 刘灏. 知识产权保护与技术选择差异——基于市场规模视角的考察[J]. 经济与管理, 2019, (1): 87-92.
方颖,郭俊杰.中国环境信息披露政策是否有效: 基于资本市场反应的研究[J].经济研究,2018,(10):158-174.
李维安,张耀伟,郑敏娜,等.中国上市公司绿色治理及其评价研究[J].管理世界,2019,(5):126-133+160.
李昭华,方紫薇.环境信息披露与中国出口企业加成率: 影响机制与资源配置效应分析[J].国际贸易问题,2021,(11):90-105.
史贝贝,冯晨,康蓉.环境信息披露与外商直接投资结构优化[J].中国工业经济,2019,(4):98-116.
万攀兵,杨冕,陈林.环境技术标准何以影响中国制造业绿色转型——基于技术改造的视角[J].中国工业经济,2021,(9):118-136.
吴磊,李广浩,李小帆.中国环境管制与FDI企业的行业进入[J].中国人口· 资源与环境,2010,(8):92-98.
吴力波,杨眉敏,孙可哿.公众环境关注度对企业和政府环境治理的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022,(2):1-14.
许明,李逸飞.最低工资政策、成本不完全传递与多产品加成率调整[J].经济研究,2020,(4):167-183.
臧成伟. 市场化有助于提高淘汰落后产能效率吗?——基于企业进入退出与相对生产率差异的分析[J].财经研究,2017,(2):135-146.
张彩云,苏丹妮.环境规制、要素禀赋与企业选址——兼论“污染避难所效应”和“要素禀赋假说”[J].产业经济研究,2020,(3):43-56.
周浩,陈益.FDI外溢对新建企业选址的影响[J].管理世界,2013,(12):78-88.
周浩,余壮雄,杨铮.可达性、集聚和新建企业选址——来自中国制造业的微观证据[J].经济学(季刊),2015,(4):1393-1416.
周浩,郑越.环境规制对产业转移的影响——来自新建制造业企业选址的证据[J]. 南方经济,2015,(4):12-26.
朱平芳,张征宇,姜国麟.FDI 与环境规制:基于地方分权视角的实证研究[J]. 经济研究,2011,(6):133-145.
祝树金,李江,张谦,等.环境信息公开、成本冲击与企业产品质量调整[J]. 中国工业经济,2022,(3):76-94.
Bai C E, Lu J Y, Tao Z G.The multitask theory of state enterprise reform: Empirical evidence from China[J]. American Economic Review,2006,96(2):353-357.
Chen Y C,Hung M Y,Wang Y X.The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,2018,65(1):169-190.
Costantini V,Crespi F.Environmental regulation and the export dynamics of energy technologies[J].Ecological Economics,2008,66(2-3):447-460.
Faber B.Trade integration,market size,and industrialization:Evidence from China's national trunk highway system[J]. Review of Economic Studies,2014,81(3):1046-1070.
Fang J,Liu C J,Gao C.The impact of environmental regulation on firm exports:Evidence from environmental information disclosure policy in China[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2019,26(36):37101-37113.
Feng Y C,He F.The effect of environmental information disclosure on environmental quality:Evidence from Chinese cities[J/OL].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,276:124027.
Lipscomb M,Mobarak A M.Decentralization and pollution spillovers: Evidence from the re-drawing of county borders in Brazil[J].The Review of Economic Studies,2016,84(1):464-502.
List J A, Millimet D L, Fredriksson P G, et al.Effects of environmental regulations on manufacturing plant births:Evidence from a propensity score matching estimator[J].Review of Economics and Statistics,2003,85(4):944-952.
Liu X,Zhang C.Corporate governance,social responsibility information disclosure,and enterprise value in China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,142:1075-1084.
Powers N,Blackman A,Lyon T P,et al.Does disclosure reduce pollution? Evidence from India's green rating project[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2011,50:131-155.
Shi D Q,Bu C Q,Xue H Y.Deterrence effects of disclosure:The impact of environmental information disclosure on emission reduction of firms[J/OL].Energy Economics,2021,104:105680.
Wang Q T,Xie X L,Wang M.Environmental regulation and firm location choice in China[J].China Economic Journal,2015,8(3):215-34.

[1]	邝嫦娥, 刘江月, 李文意. 数智融合赋能与制造业企业绿色转型[J]. 当代财经, 2024, 0(5): 114-127.
[2]	孙少岩, 高杨. 中期借贷便利担保品扩容政策的绿色转型效应研究[J]. 当代财经, 2024, 0(12): 68-82.
[3]	王芳. 企业ESG表现与低碳绿色转型——基于金融政策工具支持的效应评估[J]. 当代财经, 2024, 0(1): 152-164.
[4]	赵一心, 缪小林. 协同治理、地方政府绿色转型与空气质量改善[J]. 当代财经, 2022, 0(3): 40-52.
[5]	高静. 中美贸易中隐含的碳排放以及贸易环境效应——基于环境投入产出法的实证分析[J]. 当代财经, 2012, 0(05): 1520-.