当代财经 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 28-40.

• 公共经济与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

重大突发事件应急管理市场参与:生成逻辑、风险溢出与逆风险选择

南锐, 王竞杰, 朱文俊   

  1. 中国矿业大学(北京) 文法学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-05 修回日期:2021-11-19 出版日期:2022-02-15 发布日期:2022-02-22
  • 通讯作者: 南锐,中国矿业大学(北京)副教授,博士生导师,管理学博士,主要从事公共安全与应急管理、政府经济管理研究,联系方式201435@cumtb.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王竞杰,中国矿业大学(北京)博士研究生,主要从事公共安全与应急管理、政府经济管理研究;朱文俊,中国矿业大学(北京)博士研究生,主要从事公共安全与应急管理、政府经济管理研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目“社会资本视角下公众参与社会治理的场域、意愿与路径研究”(18CGL033); 北京市社会科学基金青年项目“北京市重大突发公共危机应急社会动员转型路径研究”(20GLC044)

Market Participation in Vital Emergent Events Management: Generative Logic, Risk Spillover and Counter-Risk Choices

NAN Rui, WANG Jing-jie, ZHU Wen-jun   

  1. China University of Mining and Technology, Peking 100083, China
  • Received:2021-08-05 Revised:2021-11-19 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-02-22

摘要: 重大突发事件的重大与突发双重特征导致治理场景呈现高度复杂性,而传统的行政控制型应急管理模式难以有效应对,完善市场机制,充分发挥市场的效率性、专业性和竞争性等优势,市场参与应急管理势在必行。重大突发事件应急管理市场参与的生成逻辑分为外生与内生的双重逻辑,外生逻辑表现为行政控制型应急管理模式,难以适应高度复杂性应急情景,会引致多重风险;内生逻辑表现为政府与市场的优势互补,会齐力助推应急善治。市场参与重大突发事件应急管理在消减传统风险的同时也产生了风险溢出,即政府传统风险异化、企业利益风险丛生与公众多重风险叠加。面对风险的急剧溢出,需要从时间、内容和管理三重维度进行逆风险选择,构建政府、市场和社会组织多元主体参与的重大突发事件应急管理共同体。

关键词: 重大突发事件, 应急管理, 市场参与, 风险溢出, 逆风险选择

Abstract: The dual characteristics of vital emergent events, i.e. vital and emergent, lead to the higher-degree complexity of the governance situation, while the emergence management mode of the traditional administrative control model is difficult to respond effectively. In order to improve the market mechanism and give full play to the efficiency, professionalism and competitiveness of the market, the market participation in the emergency management is imperative. The generation logic of market participation in the vital emergent events management can be divided into exogenous logic and endogenous logic. The exogenous logic is manifested as the emergency management of administrative control type, which is difficult to adapt to the highly complex emergency situations, and would result in multiple risks. The endogenous logic is manifested as the advantages of government and market complementing each other, which can work together to promote better governance in emergency. Market participation in vital emergent events management will generate risk spillovers while eliminating and reducing traditional risks, that is, the alienation of traditional government risks, the cluster of enterprise interest risks and the superposition of multiple public risks. In the face of rapid risk spillover, it is necessary for us to make counter-risk choices from the three dimensions of time, content and management, and build a vital emergent events management community participated by the government, the market and the social organizations.

Key words: vital emergent events, emergence management, market participation, risk spillover, counter-risk choices

中图分类号: