不同颠覆式创新市场情境下后发企业的追赶路径：多案例研究

江西财经大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 23-34.

不同颠覆式创新市场情境下后发企业的追赶路径：多案例研究

胡海波, 毛纯兵, 姜浩天

江西财经大学工商管理学院,江西南昌 330032

收稿日期:2024-04-04 修回日期:2024-11-28 出版日期:2025-01-25 发布日期:2025-02-05
通讯作者: 胡海波,江西财经大学教授,博士生导师,经济学博士,主要从事创新与战略管理研究,联系方式13133817079@163.com。
作者简介:毛纯兵,江西财经大学博士研究生,主要从事创新与战略管理研究;姜浩天,江西财经大学博士研究生,主要从事中国管理思想研究。
基金资助:
江西省社会科学基金重点项目“数字化转型推动江西省制造企业高质量发展的路径与对策研究”（21GL03）; 江西省青年马克思主义者理论研究创新工程资助项目“专精特新企业颠覆式创新的路径研究”（23ZXQM102）

Catching-Up Paths of Latecomers in Different Disruptive Innovation Market Situations: A Multi Case Study

Hu Hai-bo, Mao Chun-bing, Jiang Hao-tian

Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330032, China

Received:2024-04-04 Revised:2024-11-28 Online:2025-01-25 Published:2025-02-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在不同市场情境下采取差异化的创新策略,是后发企业实现追赶的关键。现有研究主要聚焦于旧市场情境下的后发企业追赶问题,忽视了后发企业在不同市场情境下的追赶策略。基于颠覆式创新的三类市场情境,通过多案例研究方法,探究了不同颠覆式创新市场情境下后发企业的追赶策略与追赶路径。研究发现：（1）不同颠覆式创新市场情境下后发企业追赶的驱动力和手段存在差异;（2）不同颠覆式创新市场情境下后发企业追赶采取不同的创新策略,旧市场情境下后发企业主要采取利用式创新策略,新市场情境下后发企业主要采取探索式创新策略,而在旧市场向新市场过渡的过程中,后发企业先后采取利用式创新策略与探索式创新策略;（3）颠覆式创新市场情境下后发企业追赶路径分为持续式、破坏式和复合式三种。因此,后发企业根据实际进入合适的颠覆式创新市场情境,并采取相匹配的创新战略和追赶路径。

关键词: 颠覆式创新, 后发企业, 追赶策略, 追赶路径

Abstract: Adopting differentiated innovation strategies in different market contexts is the key for latecomers to catch up. The existing researches mainly focus on the catching-up problem of latecomers in the old market scenario, neglecting the catch-up strategies of latecomers in different market scenarios. Based on three types of market scenarios for disruptive innovation, this study explores the catching-up strategies and paths of latecomers in different disruptive innovation market scenarios through a multi case study method. The findings show that: (1) there are differences in the driving forces and means for latecomers to catch up in different disruptive innovation market scenarios; (2) in different disruptive innovation market scenarios, latecomers adopt different innovation strategies to catch up. In the old market scenario, latecomers mainly adopt exploitative innovation strategies, while in the new market scenario, latecomers mainly adopt exploratory innovation strategies. In the transition from the old market to the new market, latecomers successively adopt exploitative innovation strategies and exploratory innovation strategies; (3) in the context of disruptive innovation market, there are three paths for latecomers to catch up: sustained, disruptive, and compound. Therefore, the latecomers should enter the suitable disruptive innovation market scenarios according to their actual conditions and adopt their matching innovation strategies and catching-up paths.

Key words: disruptive innovation, latecomers, catching-up strategies, catching-up paths

中图分类号:

F272

胡海波, 毛纯兵, 姜浩天. 不同颠覆式创新市场情境下后发企业的追赶路径：多案例研究[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2025, 0(1): 23-34.

Hu Hai-bo, Mao Chun-bing, Jiang Hao-tian. Catching-Up Paths of Latecomers in Different Disruptive Innovation Market Situations: A Multi Case Study[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2025, 0(1): 23-34.

参考文献

[1] 曹阳春, 欧春尧, 戴海闻, 等. 颠覆性创新研发联盟网络特征对企业创新绩效的影响研究——制度环境的调节作用[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2023, (1): 24-35.
[2] 陈思睿, 杨桂菊, 王彤. 后发企业的颠覆性创新机理模型——基于小米公司的探索性案例研究[J]. 管理案例研究与评论, 2019, (4): 365-382.
[3] 胡海波, 毛纯兵, 卢海涛, 等. 企业机会窗口打开过程: 基于组织警觉的案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2022, (1): 228-241.
[4] 黄丽娟, 谢国杰, 郑雁玲, 等. 乡村振兴背景下农村电商创业企业促进农村韧性发展的案例研究[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2023, (5): 78-90.
[5] 刘电光, 彭新敏, 张祺瑞. 后发企业如何超越追赶?——基于海天集团的技术创新与产品类别协同研究[J]. 经济管理, 2023, (5): 116-131.
[6] 彭新敏, 刘电光. 基于技术追赶动态过程的后发企业市场认知演化机制研究[J]. 管理世界, 2021, (4): 180-198.
[7] 王金凤, 王永正, 冯立杰, 等. 低端市场颠覆下后发企业商业模式创新路径研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, (16): 108-116.
[8] 吴先明, 胡博文. 对外直接投资与后发企业技术追赶[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, (10): 1546-1556.
[9] 吴晓波, 付亚男, 吴东, 等. 后发企业如何从追赶到超越?——基于机会窗口视角的双案例纵向对比分析[J]. 管理世界, 2019, (2): 151-167+200.
[10] 徐雨森, 逯垚迪, 徐娜娜. 快变市场环境下基于机会窗口的创新追赶研究——HTC公司案例分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2014, (6): 927-936.
[11] 张娜娜, 梅亮, 谢伟. 后发企业可持续追赶机制——中国制造业的启示[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, (10): 1844-1853.
[12] 张夕勇. 企业发展阶段与管理创新[J]. 审计研究, 2006, (2): 91-94.
[13] 张骁, 吴琴, 余欣. 互联网时代企业跨界颠覆式创新的逻辑[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019, (3): 156-174.
[14] Christensen C M, Raynor M, McDonald R. What is disruptive innovation?[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2015, 93(12): 44-53.
[15] Figueiredo P N, Cohen M.Explaining early entry into path-creation technological catch-up in the forestry and pulp industry: Evidence from Brazil[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(7): 1694-1713.
[16] Govindarajan V, Kopalle P K.Disruptiveness of innovations: Measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(2): 189-199.
[17] Miao Y, Song J, Lee K, et al.Technological catch-up by east Asian firms: Trends, issues, and future research agenda[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2018, 35: 639-669.
[18] Kumaraswamy A, Mudambi R, Saranga H, et al.Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components industry:Domestic firms' responses to market liberalization[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2012, 43(4): 368-395.
[19] Kuo T K, Lim S S, Sonko L K.Catch-up strategy of latecomer firms in Asia: A case study of innovation ambidexterity in PC industry[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2018, 30(12): 1483-1497.
[20] Lee K, Lim C.Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries[J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30(3): 459-483.
[21] Mathews J A.Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2002, 19(4): 467-488.
[22] Vertakova Y V, Rudakova O V, Shadrina V V, et al.Strategy of disruptive innovation in emerging regional markets: Factors of success and failure[J]. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2016, 6(8): 274-279.
[23] Wang C X, Guo F, Zhang Q P.How does disruptive innovation influence firm performance? A moderated mediation model[J]. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2023, 26(3): 798-820.
[24] Zhang K, Wang J F, Feng L J, et al.The evolution mechanism of latecomer firms value network in disruptive innovation context: A case study of Haier Group[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2019, 31(12): 1488-1500.