创业团队反思和双元领导对双元创业即兴的权变影响研究

江西财经大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 24-37.

创业团队反思和双元领导对双元创业即兴的权变影响研究

周蕾¹, 熊立²

1.南昌工学院经济与管理学院,江西南昌 330108;
2.江西财经大学工商管理学院,江西南昌 330032

收稿日期:2023-10-08 修回日期:2024-08-17 出版日期:2024-09-25 发布日期:2024-09-30
通讯作者: 熊立,江西财经大学教授,博士生导师,管理学博士,主要从事创业组织行为研究,联系方式175420600@qq.com。
作者简介:周蕾,南昌工学院副教授,主要从事企业管理与组织行为研究。
基金资助:
江西省高校人文社会科学一般项目“VUCA时代背景下创客团队双元即兴的动力机制研究”（GL23127）

Research on the Contingency Impact of Entrepreneurial Team Reflection and Dual Leadership on the Improvisation of Dual Entrepreneurship

ZHOU Lei¹, XIONG Li²

1. Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330108;
2. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330032, China

Received:2023-10-08 Revised:2024-08-17 Online:2024-09-25 Published:2024-09-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在如今瞬息万变的创业环境下,创业团队如何通过权变地激发探索式和开发式即兴行为应对不同的情境需要,已成为学术界越发关注的重点。基于权变理论,从团队过程视角入手探讨创业团队反思和双元领导行为对双元创业即兴的双重影响。根据任务反思和过程反思特征设计了两项课堂情景实验进行情境任务演练。实验一发现,任务反思和领导开放行为均更多地预测团队探索式即兴,且领导开放行为能加强任务反思对探索式即兴的正向影响,而领导闭合行为则减弱上述效应。实验二发现,过程反思和领导闭合行为均能更多地预测团队开发式即兴,且领导闭合行为能加强过程反思对开发式即兴的正向影响,而领导开放行为则减弱上述效应。两项实验结果表明,有策略性地配对团队反思和双元领导可产生多种协同作用,启发创业团队灵活处理不同反思带来的即兴差异,以双元领导来扮演重要的调控角色,从而在更大时空范围内实现创业即兴的双元均衡,释放出两种即兴在应对不同环境变化时的最佳效应,助力企业长远发展。

关键词: 双元创业即兴, 任务反思, 过程反思, 领导开放行为, 领导闭合行为

Abstract: In today’s rapidly changing entrepreneurial environment, how entrepreneurial teams can use contingency to stimulate exploratory and developmental improvisational behaviors to respond to different situational needs has become an increasingly important focus in academia. Based on the contingency theory, this study explores the dual impact of entrepreneurial team reflection and dual leadership behavior on dual entrepreneurial improvisation from the perspective of team processes. Two classroom scenario experiments are designed based on the characteristics of task reflection and process reflection to conduct scenario task exercises. The findings of Experiment 1 reveal that both task reflection and leadership open behavior can predict more team exploratory improvisation, and leadership open behavior could enhance the positive impact of task reflection on exploratory improvisation, while leadership closed behavior will weaken the above effect. The findings of Experiment 2 show that both process reflection and leadership closure behavior can predict more team development improvisation, and leadership closure behavior can enhance the positive impact of process reflection on development improvisation, while leadership openness behavior will weaken the above effect. These two experimental results indicate that the strategically pairing team reflection and the dual leadership can generate multiple synergies, inspiring entrepreneurial teams to flexibly handle improvisational differences brought about by different reflections and to play an important regulatory role by the dual leadership, thereby achieving a dual balance of entrepreneurial improvisation in a larger temporal and spatial scope, and releasing the best effects of the two improvisations in responding to different environmental changes, so as to help the long-term development of enterprises.

Key words: dual entrepreneurship improvisation, task reflection, process reflection, open leadership behavior, leadership closure behavior

中图分类号:

F270

周蕾, 熊立. 创业团队反思和双元领导对双元创业即兴的权变影响研究[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2024, 0(5): 24-37.

ZHOU Lei, XIONG Li. Research on the Contingency Impact of Entrepreneurial Team Reflection and Dual Leadership on the Improvisation of Dual Entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2024, 0(5): 24-37.

参考文献

[1] 刘耀彬, 王梦露, 熊立. 创客团队成员关系如何影响团队应急绩效——考虑平台组织的协同作用[J]. 当代财经, 2023, (2): 81-93.
[2] 马鸿佳, 吴娟, 郭海, 等. 创业领域即兴行为研究: 前因、结果及路径[J]. 管理世界, 2021, (5): 211-229.
[3] 买忆媛, 叶竹馨, 陈淑华. 从“兵来将挡,水来土掩”到组织惯例形成——转型经济中新企业的即兴战略研究[J]. 管理世界, 2015, (8): 147-165.
[4] 熊立, 贾建锋, 朱建斌, 等. 何以触发即兴? 基于创业者行为的社会学调查研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, (3): 223-232.
[5] 熊立, 杨勇, 贾建锋. “能做”和“想做”:基于内驱力的双元创业即兴对双创绩效影响研究[J]. 管理世界, 2019, (12): 137-151.
[6] 叶竹馨, 买忆媛. 探索式即兴与开发式即兴: 双元性视角的创业企业即兴行为研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, (4): 15-25.
[7] 易祎晨, 史言信. 疫情常态化下生鲜电商物流服务质量提升研究[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2022, (1): 65-75.
[8] 赵坤, 荆林波. 企业数字平台开放性权衡机制研究——基于企业家双元即兴能力视角[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022, (6): 133-142.
[9] 祝振兵, 许晟, 张帆. 主动性人格、创新行为与农民创业绩效[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2023, (2): 103-115.
[10] Abrantes A, Passos A M, Cunha M P E, et al. Getting the knack for team-improvised adaptation: The role of reflexivity and team mental model similarity[J]. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2022, 58(2): 281-315.
[11] Abrantes M, Cunha A, Passos, et al. Bringing team improvisation to team adaptation: The combined role of shared temporal cognitions and team learning behaviors fostering team performance[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2018, 84(3): 59-71.
[12] Ciuchta M P, O’Toole J, Miner A S. The organizational improvisation landscape: Taking stock and looking forward[J]. Journal of Management, 2021, 47(1): 288-316.
[13] Cunha J V D, Cunha M P E. Organizational improvisation: Change or stability?[J]. Management Research, 2010, 8(2): 81-100.
[14] Guo Z P, Yan J Q, Wang X Y, et al.Ambidextrous leadership and employee work outcomes: A paradox theory perspective[J]. Frontier in Psychology, 2020, (11): 1661-1682.
[15] Harvey J F, Green P.Constructive feedback: When leader agreeableness stifles team reflexivity[J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2022, 194: 111624.
[16] Hadida A L, Tarvainen W J R. Organizational improvisation: A consolidating review and framework[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2015, 17(4): 437-459.
[17] Konradt U, Schippers M C, Garbers Y, et al.Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: The role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2015, 24(1): 777-795.
[18] Lee Y J, Lee J H, Ham K S.Balancing efficiency and flexibility in software project: The role of team collective improvisation, behavioral integration, and member diversity[J]. World Association for Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies, 2017, 16(1): 22-48.
[19] Mannucci P V, Orazi D C, Valck K D.Developing improvisation skills: The influence of individual orientations[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2021, 66(3): 612-658.
[20] Marks M A, Mathieu J E, Zaccaro S J.A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001, 26(3): 356-376.
[21] Mascareño J, Rietzschel E F, Wisse B.Ambidextrous leadership: Opening and closing leader behaviors to facilitate idea generation, idea promotion and idea realization[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2021, 30(4): 530-540.
[22] Rosing K, Bledow R, Frese M, et al.The temporal pattern of creativity and implementation in teams[J]. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 2018, 91: 798-823.
[23] Schippers M C, West M A, Dawson J F.Team reflexivity and innovation: The moderating role of team context[J]. Journal of Management, 2015, 41(3): 769-788.
[24] Schmutz J B, Eppich W.Promoting learning and patient care through shared reflection: A conceptual framework for team reflexivity in health care[J]. Academic Medicine, 2017, 92(11): 1155-1563.
[25] Shrestha A, Saratchandra M.A conceptual framework toward knowledge ambidexterity using information systems and knowledge management[J]. Journal of Information Systems, 2023, 37(1): 143-167.
[26] Ven V D, Ganco M, Hinings C R.Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2013, 7(1): 393-440.
[27] Vera D, Crossan M.Improvisation and innovative performance in teams[J]. Organization Science, 2005, 16(3): 203-224.
[28] Wang Z N, Cui T, Cai S H.How and when team reflexivity influences employee innovative behavior[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2022, 37(1): 61-75.
[29] Xiong L.Improvise to win: The relationship between entrepreneurial improvisation and start-up competitive advantage[J]. Asian Business & Management, 2022, 21(2): 184-204.