江西财经大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 112-123.

• 法与经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

竞争法视阈下数据抓取行为的合法性——从用户同意到可携带权的思路演进

高建成   

  1. 南京大学 法学院,江苏 南京 210093
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-17 出版日期:2024-01-25 发布日期:2024-01-19
  • 作者简介:高建成,南京大学博士研究生,主要从事竞争法研究,联系方式gaojiancheng@smail.nju.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“系统论视野下的数字法治基本问题研究”(22&ZD201); 江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目“数据抓取纠纷的法律回应研究”(KYCX23_0016)

On the Legality of Data Grasping Behaviorfrom the Perspective of Competition Law: An Evolutionary Approach from User Consent to Portability Rights

GAO Jian-cheng   

  1. Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • Received:2023-02-17 Online:2024-01-25 Published:2024-01-19

摘要: 囿于数据权属不明,私法自治框架下的同意规则不足以解决数据抓取行为的合法性判断问题。可行的思路是以个人信息数据为切入点,结合可携带权制度对各主体之间的利益冲突进行调适。将可携带权思路引入不正当竞争纠纷的裁判,能够在解释论层面与反不正当竞争法规范相互衔接,共同维护消费者权益与公平竞争。基于此,对非个人信息数据而言,仅凭用户同意无法产生阻却数据抓取行为违法性的效力;至于依法享有可携带权的个人信息数据,在满足行权条件的前提下,用户可通过同意的方式授权第三方进行数据获取,进而阻却第三方行为的违法性。在应用可携带权思路裁判时,法院仍应关注用户同意是否经由欺骗、误导与强迫等不当方式取得,以确保其有效性与自愿性,同时衡量涉案个人信息数据的转移后果,避免对他人权利及自由产生不利影响。

关键词: 数据抓取, 不正当竞争, 个人信息, 可携带权

Abstract: Due to the uncertainty of data ownership, the consent rule under the framework of private law autonomy is not sufficient to adjudicate the legitimacy of data grasping behavior. A feasible idea is to take personal information data as an entry point and combine it with the right to portability system to adjust the conflicts of interests among the major subjects. Introducing the idea of the right to portability into the adjudication of unfair competition disputes can realize the integration of the norms of the anti-unfair competition law in terms of legal interpretation, and jointly safeguard the rights and interests of consumers and fair competition. Based on this, for non-personal information data, the consent of the user alone cannot have the effect of blocking the illegality of data grasping; as for the personal information data for which the user enjoys the right to portability in accordance with the law, the user can authorize the third party to access the data by means of consent under the premise of satisfying the conditions for exercising the right, thus blocking the illegality of the third party’s act. In applying the idea of portability, the court should still pay attention to whether the user’s consent has been obtained in an improper manner, such as through deception, misinformation or coercion, to ensure its validity and voluntariness, and at the same time weigh the consequences of the transfer of the personal information data in question, so as to avoid adverse effects on the rights and freedoms of others.

Key words: data grasping, unfair competition, personal information, portabilityright

中图分类号: