江西财经大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 138-148.

• 法与经济 • 上一篇    

平台权力的反垄断法规制

兰江华   

  1. 上海财经大学 法学院,上海 200433
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-16 修回日期:2022-05-23 出版日期:2022-09-25 发布日期:2022-10-26
  • 作者简介:兰江华,上海财经大学博士研究生,主要从事竞争法研究,联系方式943399056@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金后期资助重点项目“个性化新闻推荐的反垄断规制研究”(21FFXA005)

Antitrust Law Regulation of Platform Power

LAN Jiang-hua   

  1. Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Received:2022-02-16 Revised:2022-05-23 Online:2022-09-25 Published:2022-10-26

摘要: 平台经营者拥有在平台市场内制定规则、控制准入、分配资源的权力,在平台企业自利性的驱使下易于被滥用,进而损害其他主体的利益。平台权力本质上是市场力量的再表现,应当适用具有限制权力“基因”的反垄断法规制,无须借助其他公法理论或者构建新的法律制度。反垄断法规制作为一种限制平台权力的工具被忽视和低估,主要源于传统规制框架的僵化和滞后,忽略平台市场力量来源多元化和平台权力滥用损害多样化、动态化的特殊性。为此,应当创新市场支配地位认定方法,纳入平台权力要素,并拓宽竞争损害分析维度,关注平台权力滥用对竞争过程与市场结构的影响。为避免抑制自治激励、损害平台系统本身的价值,还应当将合理的自治作为正当理由之一,并明确其成立条件。

关键词: 平台权力, 反垄断法, 市场支配地位, 竞争损害

Abstract: Platform operators have the power to formulate rules, control access, and allocate resources in the platform markets. Driven by the self-interest of platform companies, this power is easy to be abused, thereby damaging the interests of other entities. Platform power is essentially a re-expression of market power, and anti-monopoly law regulations with the “gene” of limiting power should be applied on it, without resorting to other public law theories or establishing a new legal system. Anti-monopoly regulations have often been ignored and underestimated as a tool to limit platform power, mainly due to the rigidity and lagging behind of traditional regulatory frameworks, which ignores the diversification of platform market power sources and abuses the platform power resulting in the damage to the particularity of diversification and dynamism. Therefore, it is necessary to innovate the identification method of market dominance, include the elements of platform power, broaden the analytical dimension of competition damage, and pay attention to the impact of platform power abuse on the competition process and market structure. In order to avoid inhibiting the incentive of autonomy and damage the value of the platform system itself, it is also necessary to regard the reasonable autonomy as one of the legitimate reasons and clarify its establishment conditions.

Key words: platform power, anti-monopoly law, market dominance position, competition damage

中图分类号: