江西财经大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 136-148.

• 法与经济 • 上一篇    

回归拟制性规范:《契税法》第2条第3款释义学省思

叶金育, 郑乐生   

  1. 中南民族大学 法学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-01 出版日期:2022-07-25 发布日期:2022-08-10
  • 通讯作者: 叶金育,中南民族大学教授,法学博士,中南民族大学财税法研究中心主任,主要从事财税法学与环境财税政策研究,联系方式yejinyusu@163.com
  • 作者简介:郑乐生,中南民族大学助理研究员,博士研究生,主要从事财税法学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“税法建制原则的立体化构造”(17FFX006); 国家民委中青年英才科研项目“民族地区资源使用与生态补偿政策工具配置及其法制保障研究”(MSR20003); 中南民族大学科学研究基金(引进人才)资助项目“特定目的税法理构造与适用”(YSZ18010)

Returning to Fictitious Norms: Reflection on the Interpretation of Article 2, Clause 3 of the Deed Tax Law

YE Jin-yu, ZHENG Le-sheng   

  1. South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2021-12-01 Online:2022-07-25 Published:2022-08-10

摘要: 《契税法》第2条第3款一改《契税暂行条例细则》第8条惯例,既割裂了契税客体与纳税人间的关联性,凸显国库主义立场,又整合了法定规范与拟制性规范,导致契税客体杂乱;还支解了契税客体与计税依据,徒增契税计量障碍。究其原因,恐怕还在于立法者意图抹去以作价投资(入股)、偿还债务、划转、奖励等方式转移土地、房屋权属的拟制实质,而这显然与文义解释、体系解释与目的解释结果相悖。要想走出困境,当须回归拟制本质的应然定位,坚持纳税人主义立场,恪守不动产取得税秉性,遵循契税法与民法的协同思维,融贯契税构成要素的体系思维,吸取契税客体创制的基本经验,在此之下,通过增设拟制性规范的指示词和具体规则以改造《契税法》第2条第3款后半部分,借助构造拟制“列举+兜底”的动态准入要件以改造《契税法》第2条第3款前半部分。倘若如此,契税法定规范与拟制性规范有机融合,契税客体、纳税人、计税依据、税率、纳税义务发生时间与税收优惠要素无缝整合,融法定性与开放性、明确性和模糊性一体的良好契税法方可生成。

关键词: 契税, 拟制性规范, 税收客体, 纳税人, 计税依据

Abstract: Clause 3 of Article 2 of TheDeed Tax Law changes the convention of Article 8 of The Provisional Regulations on Deed Tax, which not only separates the relatedness between the object of deed tax and the taxpayer, highlighting the position of treasuryism, but also integrates the statutory norms and the fictitious norms, leading to confusion in the objects of deed tax.It also dismantles the objects of deed tax and the basis for tax calculation, which increases the obstacles to the measurement of deed tax. The reason for this is probably that the legislators intend to erase the fictitious essence of transferring land and house ownership by means of fixing a price for investment (buy shares), debt repayment, transfer, incentives, etc., which is obviously on the contrary to the results of the interpretations of the literary content, the system and the purpose. To get out of the predicament, we must return to the due position of thefictitious essence, adhere to the stanceof taxpayer, abide by the nature of real estate acquisition tax, follow the synergistic thinking of the deed tax law and the civil law, integrate the systematic thinking of the constituent elements of deed tax, and draw on thebasic experienceof institution created by the objects of deed tax.According to this, the second half ofClause 3, Article 2of The Deed Tax Lawwill be reformed by adding descriptive words and specific rules of the fictitious norms, and the first half of Clause 3 Article 2 of The Deed Tax Law will be reformed by the dynamic access elements of“enumeration + bottom line”with the help of the construction fiction. If so, the deed tax legal norms and the fictitious norms will be organically integrated, the deed tax objects, taxpayers, tax calculation basis, tax rates, tax obligation occurrence time and tax preferential elements will be seamlessly integrated, and a good deed tax method can be generatedby integrating legality with openness, clarity and ambiguity.

Key words: deed tax, fictitious norm, tax object, taxpayer, taxation basis

中图分类号: