江西财经大学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (04): 132-.

• • 上一篇    

当前我国建构长期照护保障制度的逻辑反思与现实选择

李 珍,雷咸胜   

  1. (中国人民大学 公共管理学院,北京 100872)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:李 珍,中国人民大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事社会保障理论与政策研究;雷咸胜,中国人民大学博士研究生,主要从事社会保障理论与实践研究,通讯作者联系方式leixiansheng1988@163.com。

Logical Reflection and Realistic Choice of Constructing Long-Term Care Security System in Present China

LI Zhen, LEI Xian-sheng   

  1. (Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: “十三五”规划中提出探索建立长期护理保险制度,当前探讨的焦点是如何建立社会性的长期照护保险制度。主流观点认为,我国人口老龄化和家庭小型化加剧,失能群体增多的同时家庭照护能力减弱;同时借鉴国外部分国家建立长期照护保险的经验,所以我国亟须建立社会性长期照护保险制度。试图对上述的建制逻辑进行反思,进而指出应该坚持辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义的方法论,以实际的失能人口规模和需求为导向,注重制度与经济发展水平相适应的应然逻辑。建议我国当前应构建以补缺型照护津贴为主的长期照护保障制度;合理分配政府、家庭及市场等主体责任;积极完善照护服务递送体系和统一失能鉴定标准及完善服务购买机制等配套措施。

关键词: 长期照护保障,长期照护保险,照护津贴

Abstract: The Thirteenth Five-Year Plan proposes to explore and establish the long-term care insurance system. At present, the political and academic discussions focus on how to establish a social long-term care insurance system. The mainstream view believes that with the aggravating of the aging of China’s population and the miniaturization of families, the number of disabled groups is increasing and the family-based care capacity is weakening. At the same time, drawing on the experiences of some foreign countries, it is urgent for China to establish a long-term social care insurance system. This paper attempts to reflect on the above logic of system construction and points out that the methodology of dialectical Materialism and historical Materialism should be instated on, that the actual population size and demands should be the orientation, and that attention should be paid to the ought-to-be logic suitable to the system and the level of economic development. It is suggested that at present China should construct a long-term care security system based mainly on make-up subsidies, that the main responsibilities of governments, families and markets should be rationally allocated, and that some supporting measures should be actively improved, such as the delivery system of caring services, the rating standards for the disability and the service purchase mechanism, etc..

Key words: long-term care security; long-term care insurance; care allowance