江西财经大学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (02): 152-.

• • 上一篇    

中国信托登记制度研究

徐 刚   

  1. (上海财经大学 法学院,上海 200011)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:徐 刚,上海财经大学博士,主要从事金融监管、金融法研究,联系方式xugangwell@126.com。

A Study of China’s Trust Registration System

XU Gang   

  1. (Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200011, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 中国信托登记程序规则的缺失已深深影响信托业的发展,需进行体系化设计。比较法上,与中国情况较为类似的日本、韩国和中国台湾地区的信托登记程序规则借鉴意义较大,应充分参考。对于信托登记机构设置,应在中短期内奉行“实质分散登记,形式统一窗口”模式,远期随着中国统一的财产登记机构的形成而进行统一的信托登记。信托登记申请应充分吸收“共同申请为原则,单独申请为例外”的比较法成熟规则。信托登记的审查应抛开抽象的形式审查与实质审查之争,而以解决问题为导向。信托登记申请与审查规则的设计实施均应考虑与既有登记体系的衔接,按“渐进式”思路推进。

关键词: 信托登记,程序设计,信托登记机构:中信登

Abstract: The absence of the procedure rules of China’s trust registration has greatly affected the development of the trust industry, thus it needs a systematic design. In terms of comparison, the procedure rules of trust registration in Japan, Korea and Taiwan, which are similar to those in China, are of great significance for reference and should be fully referred to. As for the establishment of trust registration institutions, we should adopt the mode of “decentralized registration in nature, unified window in form” in the short and medium term, while in the long term, we should carry out the unified trust registration along with the formation of unified property registration institutions in China. As for the application for trust registration, we should fully adopt the mature rule of comparative method that is “joint application as the principle and separate application as the exception”. The review of trust registration should put aside the dispute between abstract formal review and substantive review, and be problem-oriented. The design and implementation of the trust registration application and review rules should consider linking up with the existing registration system and promote it in a“gradual”way.

Key words: trust registration; procedure design; trust registration institution; CTRC