江西财经大学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (05): 363-.

• • 上一篇    

高等教育规模扩张的土地财政逻辑——基于地市级面板数据的实证分析

陈建伟,苏丽锋   

  1. (对外经济贸易大学 教育与开放经济研究中心,北京 100029)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:陈建伟,对外经济贸易大学助理研究员,博士,主要从事教育与经济研究;苏丽锋,对外经济贸易大学副研究员,主要从事教育与劳动经济学研究,联系方式sulf@uibe.edu.cn。

The Logic of Higher Education Expansion for More Land Revenue: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Panel Data at Prefecture Level

CHEN Jian-wei, SU Li-feng   

  1. (University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)
  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 21世纪以来主要由地方属高校推动的高等教育快速扩张,部分归因于地方政府提升土地价值、扩大土地财政收入的激励。通过构建地市级面板数据模型的计量分析发现,高等教育规模显著提升了土地出让均价:在校生规模每增加1万人,土地出让平均价格提升15.12~16.54元/平方米;第二类城市(非直辖市、非省会、非计划单列市)高等教育发展的土地价格提升效应,高于第一类城市(含直辖市,省会城市和计划单列市),表明第二类城市为了扩大土地财政规模而发展高等教育的动机更强烈。回归结果还发现,存在异质性的未观测效应:第一类城市的未观测因素在显著促进高等教育扩张的同时限制了土地出让价格的上涨,而第二类城市未观测因素在促进高等教育扩张的同时提升了土地出让均价。

关键词: 高等教育扩张,土地出让价格,面板数据样本选择模型

Abstract: The rapid expansion of higher education mainly pushed by local universities since the beginning of 21st century is due partly to the incentives of local governments to increase land value and land fiscal revenues. Through establishing a prefecture-level panel data model, this paper conducts a quantitative analysis. The results show that the scale of higher education has significantly raised the average price of land leasing: an increase of 10,000 college students at campus will result in an average increase of land price by 15.12 ~ 16.54 yuan per square meter. The promotion effect of land leasing prices in the cities of the second category (non-municipalities, non-capital cities and non-cities specifically designated in the state plan) is higher than that in the cities of the first category (municipalities, capital cities and cities specifically designated in the state plan), which means that the cities of the second category have a stronger incentive to expand the scale of land revenue by developing higher education. Moreover, the regression result identifies the unobserved heterogeneity effects: the unobserved factors of the first category cities have restricted the price increase of land leasing while promoting the expansion of higher education significantly; in contrast, the unobserved factors of the second category cities have increased the average price of land leasing while promoting the expansion of higher education.

Key words: higher education expansion; remising price of land; panel data sample selection model