创客团队成员关系如何影响团队应急绩效——考虑平台组织的协同作用

当代财经 ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 81-93.

创客团队成员关系如何影响团队应急绩效——考虑平台组织的协同作用

刘耀彬¹, 王梦露², 熊立³

1.南昌大学经济管理学院,江西南昌 330031;
2.江西新华发行集团国际教育咨询公司,江西南昌 330038;
3.江西财经大学工商管理学院,江西南昌 330032

收稿日期:2022-10-14 修回日期:2023-01-20 出版日期:2023-02-15 发布日期:2023-02-14
通讯作者: 熊立,江西财经大学副教授,博士,主要从事创业组织行为研究,175420600@qq.com。
作者简介:刘耀彬,南昌大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事管理科学与工程研究;王梦露,江西新华发行集团国际教育咨询公司职员,主要从事企业管理和组织行为研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目“创客团队如何激发双元即兴行为?——基于团队动力视角的研究”（72172054）; 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目“何以‘兴’之有效?科技创业企业的双元即兴机制与触发研究”（21YJC630143）; 江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目“瞬时竞争背景下科技型创业企业的双元即兴机制研究”（GJJ200507）

How the Member Relationshipof Maker Teams Affects Their Performance in Dealing with Emergencies? Reflection on the Synergistic Effect of Platform Organizations

LIU Yao-bin¹, WANG Meng-lu², XIONG Li³

1. Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031;
2. Jiangxi Xinhua Publishing Group Co,. Ltd., Nanchang 330038;
3. Jiangxi University of Finance & Economics, Nanchang 330032, China

Received:2022-10-14 Revised:2023-01-20 Online:2023-02-15 Published:2023-02-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在全球经济下行和新冠疫情防控的双重影响下,作为中国“双创”事业主力军的创客们面临着“非有内忧,必有外患”的多变环境,提升团队应急处理水平成为当务之急。然而,当前研究未充分关注到创客团队自身的网络关系特征对其应急处理绩效的影响。基于社会网络理论,本研究认为创客团队成员间的关系特征可能影响他们的即兴行为及类型,进而影响团队应急处理绩效;创客平台组织可通过特定的创业培训手段优化上述影响机制。来自38家平台的162个创客团队（639名成员）的问卷数据显示,团队成员网络关系强度、异质性和非正式性分别对团队双元即兴产生负向、倒U型和正向影响,并间接影响团队应急处理绩效;平台的人际关系技能培训在整个过程中发挥协同作用,能弱化关系强度的负向作用、优化关系异质性的倒U型影响曲线和增强关系非正式性的正向作用。本研究创新地关注到创客团队构成对其应急绩效的原生性影响,提议平台组织更好地发挥协同作用,帮助创客企业可持续发展。

关键词: 创客团队, 网络关系特征, 应急处理绩效, 双元即兴, 网络关系技能培训

Abstract: Under the dual impact of global economic downturn and COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control, the makersas the main force to carry out Chinese“Innovation and Entrepreneurship”cause are all faced with an ever-changing environment with“not only inside worries, but also outside troubles”. To improve the capability to deal with emergencies becomes a top priority for all of them. However, the current researches have not paid enough attention to the impact of the network relationship characteristics of the maker teams themselves on their performance in dealing with emergencies. Based on social network theory, this study proposes that the relationship characteristics among the members of maker teams can influence their impromptu behaviors and their types, which in turn affect the team performance in dealing with emergencies. The maker platform organizations may use specialized maker training strategies to optimize the above influencing mechanisms. The questionnaire data from 162 maker teams (with 639 members) on 38 platforms reveals that the network relationship strength, the heterogeneity and the informality of team members can exert negative, inverted-U shape and positive effects respectively on the double element improvisations of the teams, which in turn affect team performance in dealing with emergencies indirectly. The interpersonal skill training organized by platforms has a synergisticeffect in the whole process, i.e., playing positive role inweakening the negative effect of the relationship strength, optimizing the inverted-U shape affecting curve of relationship heterogeneity, and amplifying the positive effect of relationship informality. This study innovatively pays attention to the initial influences of maker team organizations on their emergency-dealing performance, and suggests that platform organizations should play a better synergic role in supporting thesustainable development of themaker enterprises.

Key words: maker teams, characteristics of network relationship, performance in dealing with emergencies, double element improvisation, network relationship skill training

中图分类号:

F270

刘耀彬, 王梦露, 熊立. 创客团队成员关系如何影响团队应急绩效——考虑平台组织的协同作用[J]. 当代财经, 2023, 0(2): 81-93.

LIU Yao-bin, WANG Meng-lu, XIONG Li. How the Member Relationshipof Maker Teams Affects Their Performance in Dealing with Emergencies? Reflection on the Synergistic Effect of Platform Organizations[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2023, 0(2): 81-93.

参考文献

[1] Park S., Park, S.Employee Adaptive Performance and Its Antecedents: Review and Synthesis[J]. Human Resource Development Review, 2019, 18(3): 294-324.
[2] 袁启刚,温科,汪楠. 创客关系网络、创客空间运营模式与创新成果商业化[J]. 浙江社会科学,2022,(4): 78-88+158-159.
[3] 孙柏鹏,贾建锋,许晟. 上级发展性反馈何以激发员工主动变革——基于社会认知理论视角[J]. 当代财经,2022, (8): 88-98.
[4] 杰弗里·A.迈尔斯. 管理与组织研究必读的40个理论[M]. 徐世勇,等,译. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2017.
[5] Mehra A., Kilduff M., Brass D.J. The Social Networks of High and Low Self-Monitors: Implications for Workplace Performance[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2001, 46(1): 121-146.
[6] 王海花,谢萍萍,熊丽君. 创业网络、资源拼凑与新创企业绩效的关系研究[J]. 管理科学,2019,(2): 50-66.
[7] Park S., Park S.How Can Employees Adapt to Change? Clarifying the Adaptive Performance Concepts[J]. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 2021, 32(1): 1-15.
[8] 叶竹馨,买忆媛,王乐英. 创业企业即兴行为研究现状探析与未来展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2018,(4): 16-29+55.
[9] 熊立,杨勇,贾建锋. “能做” 和 “想做”:基于内驱力的双元创业即兴对双创绩效影响研究[J]. 管理世界,2019,(12): 137-151.
[10] 赵岩. 企业创新生态系统下双元创新对价值共创的影响研究[J]. 当代财经,2020,(5): 87-99.
[11] Lewin K.Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology: Concepts and Methods[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1939, 44(6): 868-896.
[12] 孙元,贺圣君,尚荣安,傅金娣. 企业社交工作平台影响员工即兴能力的机理研究——基于在线社会网络的视角[J]. 管理世界,2019,(3): 157-168.
[13] Ciuchta M.P., O’Toole J., Miner A. S. The Organizational Improvisation Landscape: Taking Stock and Looking forward[J]. Journal of Management, 2021, 47(1): 288-316.
[14] Burt R.S. Structural Holes[M]. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
[15] Barney J.B., Felin T. What Are Microfoundations[J]. Academy of Management Perspective, 2013, (2): 138-155.
[16] 熊立,曹元坤,占小军,刘彪文. 双元文化、创新战略与科技企业创业绩效:一个知识流的视角[J]. 管理工程学报,2020,(2): 30-39.
[17] 潘松挺,郑亚莉. 网络关系强度与企业技术创新绩效——基于探索式学习和利用式学习的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究,2011,(11): 138-145.
[18] 吴岩. 创业团队的知识异质性对创业绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理,2014,(7): 84-90.
[19] Ibarra H. Network Neutrality, Power, and Innovation Involvement: Determinants of Technical and Administrative Roles[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1993, (3): 471-501.
[20] 叶竹馨,买忆媛. 探索式即兴与开发式即兴:双元性视角的创业企业即兴行为研究[J]. 南开管理评论,2018,(4): 15-25.
[21] Lee Y.J., Lee J. H., Ham K. S. Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Software Project: The Role of Team Collective Improvisation, Behavioral Integration, and Member Diversity[J]. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 2017, 16(1): 22-48.
[22] 陶祁,王重鸣. 管理培训背景下适应性绩效的结构分析[J]. 心理科学,2006,(3): 614-617+579.
[23] 张成,唐方成. 创客组织的组织协同机制及仿真研究[J]. 管理学报,2020,(7): 1033-1042.
[24] Chen Y., Tang G.Y., Cooke F. L., Jin J. F. How Does Executive Strategic Human Resource Management Link to Organizational Ambidexterity, Empirical Examination of Manufacturing Firms in China[J]. Human Resource Management, 2016, 55(5): 919-943.
[25] Podsakoff P.M., Mackenzie S. B., Lee J. Y. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5): 879-903.
[26] 张宁俊,张露,王国瑞. 关系强度对团队创造力的作用机理研究[J]. 管理科学,2019,32(1): 101-113.
[27] Rogan M., Mors M.L., Birkinshaw J. A Network Perspective on Individual Level Ambidexterity in Organizations[J]. 2014, 25(6): 1860-1877.
[28] Mom T.J. M., Chang Y. Y., Cholakova M. A Multilevel Integrated Framework of Firm HR Practices, Individual Ambidexterity, and Organizational Ambidexterity[J]. Journal of Management, 2019, 45(7): 3009-3034.
[29] 顾倩妮,苏勇. 职业适应能力对管理者职业成功的影响——适应性绩效的中介效应[J]. 当代财经,2016,(10): 80-86.
[30] Edwards J.R., Lambert L. S. Methods for Integrating Moderation and Mediation: A General Analytical Framework Using Moderated Path Analysis[J]. Psychological Methods, 2007, 12(1): 1-22.
[31] 林伟鹏,冯保艺. 管理学领域的曲线效应及统计检验方法[J]. 南开管理评论,2022,(1): 155-166.
[32] 张桂蓉,雷雨,周付军. 社会网络视角下政府应急组织协同治理网络结构研究——以中央层面联合发文政策为例[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,(11): 90-104.
[33] 王燕青,林育任,马宇飞. 任务沟通与团队情境意识对机场应急救援绩效的影响机制分析[J/OL]. 安全与环境学报,2022,22(6):3303-3311.