当代财经 ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 68-80.

• 现代金融 • 上一篇    下一篇

金融错配与企业金融化

桂燕1, 吕江林2,1, 汪洋3,1   

  1. 1.江西财经大学 金融学院,江西 南昌 330013;
    2.上海财经大学浙江学院 金融系,浙江 金华 321013;
    3.江西师范大学 财政金融学院,江西 南昌 330022
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-08 修回日期:2022-12-08 出版日期:2023-02-15 发布日期:2023-02-14
  • 通讯作者: 吕江林,上海财经大学浙江学院/江西财经大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事货币银行、资本市场与风险管理研究,联系方式ljl5983@126.com。
  • 作者简介:桂燕,江西财经大学博士研究生,主要从事公司金融与资本市场研究;汪洋,江西师范大学/江西财经大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事货币理论与政策、金融开发与金融发展研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“中央银行的逻辑与现代中央银行制度的建设”(21ZDA045); 江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目“乡村振兴战略下江西省农村金融服务的深化与创新研究”(JJ20217); 上海财经大学浙江学院重点科研项目“中国金融开放与非金融企业金融化研究”(202101)

Financial Mismatch and Enterprise Financialization

GUI Yan1, LV Jiang-lin2,1, WANG Yang3,1   

  1. 1. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013;
    2. Zhejiang College, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Jinhua 321023;
    3. Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China
  • Received:2022-10-08 Revised:2022-12-08 Online:2023-02-15 Published:2023-02-14

摘要: 我国金融体系存在的金融错配理论上会通过企业投资组合选择促进企业增加金融投资。基于我国2007—2019年非金融上市公司数据的实证研究表明,金融错配显著促进了企业金融化;金融错配主要促进了长期金融资产和类金融资产投资,前者在盈利能力强的企业中更突出,后者仅在盈利能力弱和国有企业中显著。机制检验发现,金融错配通过提高融资约束和扩大金融与实体收益差促进企业金融化,并对不同类型金融资产的影响表现出动机异质性。如受金融错配的影响,企业增加长期金融资产投资,是出于缓解融资约束的预防性储蓄动机和获取高额金融回报的主动逐利动机,而增加类金融资产配置仅是迫于主业投资收益率下降的被动逐利动机。进一步检验揭示,利率管制放松和数字普惠金融发展均能弱化金融错配作用下的企业金融化,但主要是弱化类金融资产配置。未来,相关部门有必要深层次地推进金融体系市场化,提高金融资源配置效率,引导金融回归实体经济;需推进数字普惠金融发展和多层次全链条资本市场建设,促进金融服务精准落地,适配经济高质量发展。

关键词: 金融错配, 企业金融化, 数字普惠金融, 金融资产类型, 动机异质性

Abstract: The financial mismatch existing in China’s financial system will theoretically promote enterprises to increase financial investment through portfolio selection. This paper conducts anempirical research based on the data of non-financial listed companies in China from 2007 to 2019. The findings show that financial mismatch has significantly promoted the financialization of enterprises in general, and that it mainly promotes the investment in long-term financial assets and quasi financial assets. The former is more prominent in the enterprises with strong profitability, while the latter is only significant in the enterprises with weak profitability and in the state-owned enterprises. The result of the mechanism test shows that financial mismatch promotes enterprise financialization by improving financing constraints and expanding the income gap between finance and entities, but this impact on different types of financial assets shows heterogeneous motivation. For example, under the influence of financial mismatch, enterprises will increase investment in long-term financial assets, which is out of the motive of“preventing savings”to ease financing constraints and the motive of active“profit seeking”to obtain excess financial returns, while increasing the allocation of quasi-financial assets is only out of the passive“profit seeking”motive forced by the decline of the return on the investment in the main business. Further inspection reveals that the relaxation of interest rate control and the development of digital inclusive finance can both weaken the enterprise financialization under the effect of financial mismatch, but mainly weaken the allocation of the quasi-financial assets. In the future, it is necessary for the relevant departments to further promote the marketization of the financial system, improve the efficiency of financial resource allocation, and guide finance to return to the real economy.It is also necessary to promote the development of digital inclusive finance and the construction of the multi-level and full chain capital markets, promote the accurate implementation of financial services, and adapt to the high-quality economic development.

Key words: financial mismatch, enterprise financialization, digital inclusive finance, types offinancial assets, motivation heterogeneity

中图分类号: