当代财经 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 17-26.

• 理论经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国经济高质量发展的测度、比较与战略路径

吴志军a, 梁晴b   

  1. 江西财经大学 a.江西经济发展与改革研究院; b.产业经济研究院,江西 南昌 330013
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-15 修回日期:2020-02-25 出版日期:2020-04-15 发布日期:2020-12-11
  • 通讯作者: 吴志军,江西财经大学教授,博士生导师,经济学博士,主要从事区域经济学与产业投融资研究,联系方式2429793299@qq.com;
  • 作者简介:梁 晴,江西财经大学博士研究生,主要从事产业集聚与融合发展研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“政治制度对经济发展影响的随机动态规划与实证研究:基于DSGE与动态面板分析方法”(71503110); 江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目“创建长江经济带承接产业转移示范区的政策支持研究”(JJ17106); 江西省2019年度研究生创新专项资金项目“新时代如何防范和化解地方政府债务风险的定量研究”(YC2019-S233)

The Measurement, Comparison and Strategic Path of China's High Quality Economic Development

WU Zhi-jun, LIANG Qing   

  1. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China
  • Received:2019-11-15 Revised:2020-02-25 Online:2020-04-15 Published:2020-12-11

摘要: 我国经济已由高速增长转向高质量发展,如何进一步推进高质量发展是新时代全国各地方经济工作的首要任务。在剖析经济高质量发展的内涵基础上,科学构建评价指标体系,同时采用熵权法和系统聚类等方法测度全国经济高质量发展水平及空间分布规律。研究发现:截至2017年末,我国经济高质量发展呈现出东-中-西依次递减的阶梯状空间分布格局,各省份的经济高质量发展状况存在明显的区域分布不均衡。具体表现为:综合水平最高是北京,其次是上海、广东、江苏和天津;重庆在众多中西部省份中一枝独秀,也是唯一进入全国前十的西部地区;广大中西部,尤其西部地区在综合质效、创新、协调、开放和共享等维度均相对较后。

关键词: 经济高质量发展, 评价指标体系, 熵权法, 系统聚类

Abstract: China's economy has changed from high-speed growth to high-quality development. How to further promote the high-quality economic development has become the primary task of the economic work of the whole country in the new era. Based on the in-depth analysis of the connotation of high-quality economic development, this paper constructs a new evaluation index system of high-quality economic development in China and scientifically measures the national high-quality economic development level and its spatial distribution law by using the entropy weight method and the system clustering method. The research findings show that the current situation of China's high-quality economic development has presented a stepwise spatial distribution state of “East-Central-West” regions decreasing in turn, and there are obvious regional uneven differences in the high-quality economic development among different provinces by the end of 2017. For specific performances, the highest comprehensive level of high-quality economic development is of Beijing, followed by Shanghai, Guangdong, Jiangsu and Tianjin. Chongqing is“the most outstanding one”among the central and western provinces, and the only western region among the top ten in China. Most of the central and western regions, especially the western regions, are relatively lagging behind at such dimensions as comprehensive quality and efficiency, innovation, coordination, opening-up and sharing.

Key words: high quality economic development, evaluation index system, entropy weight method, system clustering

中图分类号: