当代财经 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (9): 139-151.

• 管理科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

双重期望差距对企业人工智能漂洗的影响

沈仪扬1, 杨洪涛1, 朱秋华2   

  1. 1.华侨大学 工商管理学院,福建 泉州 362021;
    2.泉州师范学院 陈守仁商学院,福建 泉州 362000
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-26 修回日期:2026-06-18 出版日期:2026-09-15 发布日期:2026-09-14
  • 通讯作者: 杨洪涛(1973—),男,黑龙江哈尔滨人,华侨大学教授,博士生导师,管理学博士,主要从事人工智能创新与创业管理研究,联系方式yht@hqu.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:沈仪扬(1996—),女,江苏南京人,华侨大学博士研究生,主要从事人工智能创新与创业管理研究;朱秋华(1992—),女,河南周口人,泉州师范学院讲师,管理学博士,主要从事人工智能创新与算法管理研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“生成式人工智能用户数据侵权担忧对人机共创意愿的认知机制与破解路径研究”(25BGL056)

The Impact of Dual Performance Aspiration Gaps on Corporate AI Washing

Shen Yi-yang1, Yang Hong-tao1, Zhu Qiu-hua2   

  1. 1. Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China;
    2. Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, China
  • Received:2025-05-26 Revised:2026-06-18 Online:2026-09-15 Published:2026-09-14

摘要: 在人工智能(AI)技术应用中,企业AI漂洗这一言行解耦行为已成为威胁创新生态的重要议题,但现有研究尚未对其绩效反馈动因进行系统性探讨。结合绩效反馈理论与印象管理理论,以2011—2023年A股上市公司为样本,探究双重期望差距对企业AI漂洗的差异化影响及其边界条件的研究结果表明,历史期望顺差和行业期望落差显著正向驱动企业AI漂洗,历史期望落差和行业期望顺差显著抑制企业AI漂洗。当董事会独立性或区域AI关注水平较高时,对于已达成行业期望的企业,历史期望顺差对AI漂洗的正向效应会被弱化,而历史期望落差对其的负向效应会被强化。异质性分析进一步表明,上述关系在高技术企业和非数字企业中尤为突出。基于上述结论,政府应构建“制度-认知”双重规制体系监管并规范企业AI技术信息披露;利益相关者应提升甄别能力,重点警惕处于历史期望顺差和行业期望落差状态的企业;企业则应优化管理层激励机制,并强化独立董事的内部监督职能。

关键词: 人工智能, AI漂洗, 双重期望差距, 董事会独立性, 区域AI关注水平

Abstract: Corporate AI washing, a decoupling between AI-related talk and action, has become an important issue threatening innovation ecosystems, yet its performance-feedback drivers remain underexplored. Integrating performance feedback theory and impression management theory, this study examines how dual performance aspiration gaps affect corporate AI washing and identifies their boundary conditions. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2023, we test the hypotheses with two-way fixed-effects regressions. The results show that historical aspiration surplus and industry aspiration shortfall significantly increase corporate AI washing, whereas historical aspiration shortfall and industry aspiration surplus significantly inhibit it. When board independence or regional AI attention is high, firms that meet industry aspirations show a weaker positive effect of historical aspiration surplus on AI washing and a stronger negative effect of historical aspiration shortfall. Heterogeneity analysis further shows that these relationships are particularly pronounced among high-tech enterprises and non-digital enterprises. Based on these findings, governments should establish a dual institutional-cognitive regulatory system to supervise and standardize corporate AI-related technology disclosures. Stakeholders should strengthen their ability to identify AI washing and pay particular attention to firms with historical aspiration surpluses and industry aspiration shortfalls. Firms, in turn, should optimize executive incentive mechanisms and strengthen the internal monitoring role of independent directors. A tripartite governance mechanism involving governments, stakeholders, and firms can effectively curb corporate AI washing.

Key words: artificial intelligence, AI washing, dual performance aspiration gaps, board independence, regional AI attention

中图分类号: