当代财经 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (9): 152-164.

• 管理科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

合舟共溺:一致行动人与企业违规行为

邵剑兵, 王露晔   

  1. 辽宁大学 经济学部商学院,辽宁 沈阳 110036
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-21 修回日期:2026-07-16 出版日期:2026-09-15 发布日期:2026-09-14
  • 通讯作者: 王露晔(1998—),女,辽宁本溪人,辽宁大学博士研究生,主要从事公司治理研究,联系方式wangluye0024@163.com。
  • 作者简介:邵剑兵(1973—),男,辽宁盘锦人,辽宁大学教授,博士生导师,管理学博士,主要从事公司治理研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“大数据情境下国有企业高管层激励与监管动态耦合研究”(18BGL081); 辽宁省科学技术计划项目“辽宁创新资源服务中央企业创新发展的路径研究”(2025JH4/10100020)

United We Fall: People Acting in Concert and Corporate Violations

Shao Jian-bing, Wang Lu-ye   

  1. Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China
  • Received:2025-03-21 Revised:2026-07-16 Online:2026-09-15 Published:2026-09-14

摘要: 一致行动人能真实地反映股东对上市公司的实质性控制程度。以往研究多聚焦于一致行动人的治理优势,对其产生的消极影响关注不足。基于2015—2024年沪深A股上市公司数据的研究发现,一致行动人对企业控制程度的提升,显著正向影响企业违规概率、违规程度与违规处罚金额。企业数字化转型和科技化监管在一致行动人与企业违规行为之间起到内生纠偏和外生约束作用。机制检验结果表明,一致行动人通过增加违规压力、创造违规机会及推动自我合理化认知,增加企业实施违规行为的可能性。进一步研究显示,在违规类型上,与企业经营违规相比,一致行动人对信息披露违规、企业领导者违规行为的影响更显著;在控制程度上,当一致行动人拥有绝对控制权时,企业违规的可能性最大。基于上述结论,监管机构应强化对一致行动人的穿透式监管,构建差异化监管体系;企业应积极推动数字化转型,筑牢合规基础,中小投资者应建立相关的风险识别机制,推动上市公司治理结构与资本市场运行秩序的不断完善。

关键词: 一致行动人, 企业违规行为, 企业数字化转型, 科技化监管

Abstract: While acting-in-concert entities can more accurately reflect the substantive control of shareholders over listed companies, existing research has predominantly focused on their governance advantages, paying insufficient attention to their negative effects. Based on a study of data from A-share listed companies in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2015 to 2024, it is found that an increase in the degree of control by concerted actors significantly raises the probability of corporate misconduct, the severity of violations, and the amount of penalties imposed. Corporate digital transformation and technology-driven regulation serve as endogenous corrective and exogenous constraint mechanisms, respectively, mitigating the relationship between acting-in-concert entities and corporate violations. Mechanism tests confirm that acting-in-concert entities elevate the probability of violations by intensifying violation pressure, creating opportunities for misconduct, and fostering self-justifying cognitions. Further analysis shows that, by type of violation, compared to operational violations, acting-in-concert entities have a more pronounced impact on information disclosure violations and leaders’ misconduct. By degree of control, the likelihood of corporate violations is highest when acting-in-concert entities possess absolute control. Based on these findings, regulatory authorities should establish a differentiated supervision system for acting-in-concert entities and strengthen penetration-style oversight. Companies should actively promote digital transformation to build a solid compliance foundation, while minority investors need to develop risk identification mechanisms. These measures can collectively optimize the corporate governance structure and enhance the operational order of capital markets.

Key words: people acting in concert, corporate violations, corporate digital transformation, technology-driven regulation

中图分类号: