当代财经 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 3-14.

• 研究阐释党的二十届四中全会精神 •    下一篇

制度型开放提升产业链供应链韧性的逻辑

戴翔   

  1. 南京审计大学 统计与数据科学学院,江苏 南京 211815
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-22 修回日期:2026-01-07 出版日期:2026-02-15 发布日期:2026-01-30
  • 作者简介:戴翔,南京审计大学教授,博士生导师,经济学博士,主要从事开放型经济理论与实践研究,联系方式aufedx@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国式现代化的统计监测评价问题研究”(23&ZD036); 江苏省社会科学基金项目“‘制度-政策-生态’三元视角下政府协同治理影响江苏民营企业创新的机制,效应与路径研究”(25ZHB007)

The Logic of Institutional Openness in Enhancing the Resilience of Industrial Chain and Supply Chain

Dai Xiang   

  1. Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211815, China
  • Received:2025-10-22 Revised:2026-01-07 Online:2026-02-15 Published:2026-01-30

摘要: 全球价值链分工在提升效率的同时,也引发了产业链供应链的安全与稳定问题,因此,如何提升产业链供应链韧性,统筹开放和安全,是当前世界各国面临的共同议题。理论分析表明,产业链供应链韧性涉及扭曲程度、恢复程度和恢复速度三个维度,而上述三个维度均与中间品的畅通性有关,换言之,中间品的可得性、效率性和质量性很大程度上决定着产业链供应链韧性的三个维度。全球价值链分工内生地要求不同生产环节和阶段要实现“无缝对接”,这就要求中间品畅通需要一个更加稳定、透明、可预期的制度环境。制度型开放正是通过“境内开放、规则导向、政策协调、双向整合”等特征,构建起保障中间品畅通的制度体系,从而系统作用于产业链供应链韧性三维度,实现从抵御冲击到快速恢复的动态稳定。这正是中国近年来持续强调并大力推进制度型开放的深层逻辑。需要进一步强调的是,伴随经济形态和国际分工的演变,中间品的内涵与外延也在发生深刻变化。因此,提升中国产业链供应链韧性在具体的举措方面需要构建一个包含纵向深化、横向拓展、系统协同与差异化实施的路径体系。

关键词: 制度型开放, 产业链供应链, 韧性

Abstract: While the global value chain division of labor enhances efficiency, it also raises issues of security and stability in industrial and supply chains. Therefore, how to improve the resilience of industrial and supply chains and balance openness with security is a common challenge faced by countries worldwide. Theoretical analysis shows that the resilience of industrial and supply chains involves the three dimensions: Distortion level, recovery level, and recovery speed, all of which are related to the smooth flow of intermediate goods. In other words, the availability, efficiency and quality of intermediate goods largely determine the three dimensions of industrial and supply chain resilience. The endogenous requirement of the global value chain division of labor for“seamless integration”across different production stages necessitates a more stable, transparent, and predictable institutional environment for the smooth flow of intermediate goods. Institutional openness, characterized by“domestic openness, rule orientation, policy coordination, and two-way integration”, constructs an institutional framework to ensure the smooth flow of intermediate goods, thereby systematically addressing the three dimensions of industrial and supply chain resilience and achieving dynamic stability from shock resistance to rapid recovery. This is precisely the underlying logic behind China’s continuous emphasis and vigorous promotion of institutional openness in recent years. It should be further emphasized that, with the evolution of economic forms and international division of labor, the connotation and extension of intermediate goods are also undergoing profound changes. Hence, to enhance the resilience of China’s industrial and supply chains, a path system should be constructed in terms of specific countermeasures and measures, which includes vertical deepening, horizontal expansion, systematic coordination, and differentiated implementation.

Key words: institutional openness, industrial chain and supply chain, resilience

中图分类号: