中国服务业综合改革的绿色创新效应

当代财经 ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (9): 111-122.

中国服务业综合改革的绿色创新效应

刘胜¹, 徐榕鑫², 陈秀英³

1.广东外语外贸大学粤港澳大湾区研究院,广东广州 510006;
2.澳门大学社会科学学院,澳门 999078;
3.广东金融学院经济贸易学院,广东广州 510521

收稿日期:2022-12-12 修回日期:2023-07-11 出版日期:2023-09-15 发布日期:2023-09-15
通讯作者: 徐榕鑫,澳门大学博士研究生,主要从事产业经济研究,联系方式 rongxin.xu@um.edu.mo。
作者简介:刘胜,广东外语外贸大学副教授,博士,主要从事产业经济研究;陈秀英,广东金融学院副教授,博士,主要从事宏观经济研究。
基金资助:
广东省哲学社会科学规划项目“数字化赋能与制造业全球价值链攀升：理论逻辑与广东实践”（GD22YYJ16）; 广州市哲学社会科学发展“十四五”规划课题“广州建设现代服务业强市研究：基于数字化转型协同治理视角”（2022GZQN06）

Green Innovation Effect of China's Comprehensive Reform of Service Sector

LIU Sheng¹, XU Rong-xin², CHEN Xiu-ying³

1. Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, 510006;
2. University of Macau, Macao 999078;
3. Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou, 510521, China

Received:2022-12-12 Revised:2023-07-11 Online:2023-09-15 Published:2023-09-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在服务化转型背景下,服务要素投入作为绿色低碳转型的重要动力,由其部门综合改革所引发的绿色创新效应值得关注。现有文献强调了产业部门管制放松对服务业效率提升的影响,却忽略了服务业制度创新带来的绿色外溢效应。基于此,运用双重差分法和三重差分法,对服务业综合改革试点政策的绿色创新效果进行探讨。研究发现：服务业综合改革能显著提高试点地区企业的绿色创新能力;服务业综合改革的绿色创新效应在国有企业、市场势力较强企业、非重污染行业企业、服务业外资开放度及数字化程度低的企业中更为明显;服务业综合改革通过优化服务业中间投入结构、降低经营管理成本费用、强化上下游产业间关联强度及建立绿色服务体系来提升企业绿色创新绩效。在高质量发展视阈下,应以特色化与差异化发展思路释放服务业改革的绿色红利,立足本地实际与改革创新相结合,先行先试探索可供复制推广的经验与典范,由此实现服务业治理现代化和企业环境、社会、责任诉求的深度融合。

关键词: 服务业综合改革, 体制机制创新, 绿色技术创新, 准自然实验

Abstract: In the context of service-oriented transformation, the service factor input is animportant driving force to drive the green low-carbon transformation, and the green innovation effect triggered by the comprehensive reform of its departments deserves attention. The existing literature highlights the impact of industrial sector deregulation on the improvement of the efficiency of service sector, but ignores the green spillover effects brought forward by the institutional innovation of the service sector. Thus, this paper applies the methods of DID and DDD to explore the green innovation effect of the pilot policy for the service sector comprehensive reform. The findings show that the comprehensive reform of service sector can significantly improve the green innovation performance of firms in the pilot areas, thatthe green innovation effect of the service sector comprehensive reform is more significant in the state-owned enterprises, the enterprises with stronger market power, the enterprises in the non-heavy pollution industry, and the enterprises with lower foreign investment openness and lower digitalization degree in the service sector, and that the comprehensive reform of the service industry can improve the green innovation performance of enterprises by optimizing the intermediate input structure of the service industry, reducing operation and management costs, strengthening the correlation strength between upstream and downstream industries, and establishing a green service system.From the view of high-quality development, it is necessary to unleash the green dividends of service industry reform with a distinctive and differentiated development approach, keep a foothold on the combination between local reality and reform and innovation, explore step by step the experiences and models that can be replicated and promoted, thereby achieving a deep integration of service industry governance modernization and the environmental, social and responsibility demands of enterprises.

Key words: comprehensive reform of service sector, innovation of system and mechanism, innovation of green technology, quasi natural experiment

中图分类号:

F062.9

刘胜, 徐榕鑫, 陈秀英. 中国服务业综合改革的绿色创新效应[J]. 当代财经, 2023, 0(9): 111-122.

LIU Sheng, XU Rong-xin, CHEN Xiu-ying. Green Innovation Effect of China's Comprehensive Reform of Service Sector[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2023, 0(9): 111-122.

参考文献

[1] Francois J., Hoekman B.Services Trade and Policy[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2010, 48(3): 642-692.
[2] Bas M.The Effect of Communication and Energy Services Reform on Manufacturing Firms' Innovation[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2020, 48(2): 339-362.
[3] Zeng W.P., Li L., Huang Y. Industrial Collaborative Agglomeration, Marketization, and Green Innovation: Evidence from China's Provincial Panel Data[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 279: 123598.
[4] 夏杰长. 打破垄断和完善规制:深化现代服务业改革的关键所在[J]. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)2013,(3):1-6.
[5] 刘胜,徐榕鑫,陈秀英. 服务业综合改革政策的效果评估——兼论体制机制创新助力高质量发展启示[J]. 上海财经大学学报,2021,(3):79-94.
[6] North D.C. Structure and Change in Economic History[M]. New York: Norton, 1981: 23-87.
[7] Conway P., Nicoletti G.Product Market Regulation in the Non-Manufacturing Sectors of OECD Countries: Measurement and Highlights[R]. OECD Economics Department Working Paper, No.530, 2006.
[8] Forni L., Gerali A., Pisani M.Macroeconomic Effects of Greater Competition in the Service Sector: The Case of Italy[J]. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2010, 14(5): 677-708.
[9] Arnold J.M., Javorcik B. S., Lipscomb M., Mattoo A. Services Reform and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from India[J]. The Economic Journal, 2016, 126(590): 1-39.
[10] Francois J., Woerz J. Producer Services, Manufacturing Linkages,Trade[J]. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2008, 8(3-4): 199-229.
[11] Konan D.E., Van Assche A. Regulation, Market Structure and Service Trade Liberalization[J]. Economic Modelling, 2007, 24(6): 895-923.
[12] Chava S., Oettl A., Subramanian A., Subramanian K.V. Banking Deregulation and Innovation[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2013, 109(3): 759-774.
[13] 李永友,严岑. 服务业“营改增”能带动制造业升级吗?[J]. 经济研究,2018,(4):18-31.
[14] 孙浦阳,侯欣裕,盛斌. 服务业开放、管理效率与企业出口[J]. 经济研究,2018,(7):136-151.
[15] Hsieh C.T., Klenow P. J. Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2009, 124(4): 1403-1448.
[16] Barone G., Cingano F.Service Regulation and Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries[J]. The Economic Journal, 2011, 121(555): 931-957.
[17] Arnold J.M., Javorcik B. S., Mattoo A. Does Services Liberalization Benefit Manufacturing Firms?: Evidence from the Czech Republic[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2011, 85(1): 136-146.
[18] Rajan R., Zingales L.Financial Development and Growth[J]. American Economic Review, 1998, 88(3): 559-586.
[19] Yang Z., Lin Y.The Effects of Supply Chain Collaboration on Green Innovation Performance: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Analysis[J]. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2020, 23(July): 1-10.
[20] Cruz-Cázares C., Bayona-Sáez C., García-Marco T.You Can't Manage Right What You Can't Measure Well: Technological Innovation Efficiency[J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(6-7): 1239-1250.
[21] Tumelero C., Sbragia R., Evans S.Cooperation in R&D and Eco-Innovations: The Role in Companies' Socioeconomic Performance[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 207: 1138-1149.
[22] 吕越,陆毅,吴嵩博,王勇.“一带一路”倡议的对外投资促进效应——基于2005—2016年中国企业绿地投资的双重差分检验[J]. 经济研究,2019,(9):187-202.
[23] 陈冬华,姚振晔. 政府行为必然会提高股价同步性吗?——基于我国产业政策的实证研究[J]. 经济研究,2018,(12):112-128.
[24] Lu Y., Tao Z.G., Zhu L. M. Identifying FDI Spillovers[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2017, 107(July): 75-90.
[25] 毛其淋. 贸易政策不确定性是否影响了中国企业进口?[J]. 经济研究,2020,(2):148-164.
[26] 王超,李真真,蒋萍. 环境规制政策对中国重污染工业行业技术创新的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理,2021,(2):88-99.
[27] 苏丹妮,盛斌. 服务业外资开放如何影响企业环境绩效——来自中国的经验[J]. 中国工业经济,2021,(6):61-79.