当代财经 ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (7): 3-16.

• 理论经济 •    下一篇

“绿色工厂”认定对企业绿色创新的影响研究

朱朝晖a, 林雯a, 曾爱民a, 胡英杰b   

  1. 浙江工商大学 a.会计学院; b.工商管理学院,浙江 杭州 310018
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-14 修回日期:2022-11-24 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-09-13
  • 通讯作者: 林雯,浙江工商大学博士研究生,主要从事财务管理与创新研究,联系方式cloudslin@126.com
  • 作者简介:朱朝晖,浙江工商大学教授,博士生导师,博士,主要从事财务管理与创新研究;曾爱民,浙江工商大学教授,博士生导师,博士,主要从事财务管理研究;胡英杰,浙江工商大学博士研究生,主要从事企业社会责任研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目“供应链驱动制造业企业绿色创新的作用机理与风险防控研究”(21AGL013)

Research on the Impact of“Green Factory”Certification on Enterprise Green Innovation

ZHU Zhao-hui, LIN Wen, ZENG Ai-min, HU Ying-jie   

  1. Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
  • Received:2022-02-14 Revised:2022-11-24 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-09-13

摘要: 如何激励企业绿色创新以促进制造业的整体绿色转型升级已成为环境规制政策和理论研究亟待解决的关键问题。以“绿色工厂”认定这一自愿型环境规制政策的实施作为准自然实验,运用多时点PSM-DID模型考察其绿色创新引导效果的研究发现,在获得“绿色工厂”认定后,企业绿色创新水平显著提升,实现了创新质量而非数量的突破。机制分析结果表明,“绿色工厂”认定能有效地协同政府补贴与绿色信贷政策工具,助力企业获得更多的政府环保补助,缓解长期信贷成本与规模约束;同时,发挥信号作用吸引长期机构投资者的支持以提升绿色创新质量。异质性分析发现,获得多次认定、环境信息更透明、未发生过环境违规的“绿色工厂”,其绿色创新质量的提升更为显著;而重污染行业“绿色工厂”的绿色创新质量提升效果较弱。这些发现表明,政策制定者应进一步结合行业属性加强认定政策与其他政策工具的协同性以提升激励效果;完善“绿色工厂”信息披露制度,充分发挥信号作用;强化事前资格审查、事后考核监督及认定名单动态调整,以持续提供绿色创新动力。上述研究结论不仅为绿色认定政策的实施效果与作用机制提供经验证据,还对我国多元政策体系构建、充分发挥政府与资本市场在绿色转型升级中的互补作用、推进绿色制造工程建设具有重要的现实意义。

关键词: “绿色工厂”认定, 绿色创新, 自愿型环境规制

Abstract: How to stimulate enterprises’ green innovation to promote the overall green transformation and upgrading of manufacturing industry has become a key issue that needs to be solved urgently in environmental regulation policy and theoretical research. Taking the implementation of the voluntary environmental regulation policy of“green factory”certification as a quasi-natural experiment, this paper employs the multi-time point PSM-DID model to investigate the guiding effect of green innovation. The findings show that the level of green innovation of enterprises increases significantly after obtaining the“green factory”certification, which is mainly reflected in the breakthrough of innovation quality rather than quantity. The result of the mechanism analysis shows that the“green factory”certification, in conjunction with government subsidies and green credit policy tools, can effectively help enterprises obtain more government environmental subsidies, ease long-term credit costs and scale constraints, and serve as a signal to attract support from long-term institutional investors to improve the quality of green innovation. The heterogeneity analysis reveals that the quality of green innovation is moresignificantly enhanced when the“green factory”has been recognized for many times, its environmental information is more transparent and no environmental violation has been found, while the effect of the green innovation quality improvement is rather weak when the“green factory”is in heavy pollution industries. These findings suggeststhat the policy-makers should further strengthen the synergy between the certification policy and other policy tools in combination with industry attributes to enhance the incentive effect, improve the“green factory”information disclosure system to give full play to the role of signals, strengthen the pre-qualification examination and post-assessment supervision and the dynamic adjustment of the accreditation list, so as to continue to provide impetus for green innovation. The above conclusions not only provide empirical evidences for the implementation effect and function mechanism of the green certification policy, but also have great practical significance for constructing a diversified policy system, giving full play to the complementary role of government and capital markets in green transformation and upgrading, and promoting the construction of green manufacturing engineering.

Key words: “green factory”certification, green innovation, voluntary environmental regulation

中图分类号: