协同治理、地方政府绿色转型与空气质量改善

当代财经 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 40-52.

协同治理、地方政府绿色转型与空气质量改善

赵一心^a, 缪小林^b

云南财经大学 a. 经济学院; b. 财政与公共管理学院/公共政策研究中心,云南昆明 650221

收稿日期:2021-06-03 出版日期:2022-03-15 发布日期:2022-03-31
通讯作者: 缪小林,云南财经大学教授,博士生导师,博士,主要从事财政理论与政策研究,联系方式xlmiao1983@qq.com。
作者简介:赵一心,云南财经大学博士研究生,主要从事财政理论与政策研究;
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目“国家治理视角下公共服务供给的财政制度研究”（71833005）; 国家自然科学基金地区科学基金项目“地方债风险时空转移及其系统性风险研究：风险源识别、路径机理与预警控制”（71763029）; 云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目“云南省环保政策治理效应的评估研究：基于政策文本量化分析”（2020Y0370）

Collaborative Governance, Local Governments' Green Transformation and Air Quality Improvement

ZHAO Yi-xin, MIAO Xiao-lin

Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China

Received:2021-06-03 Online:2022-03-15 Published:2022-03-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 构建现代环境治理体系,加快推进地方政府协同治理,具有重要的现实意义。基于2004—2019年中国284个地级及以上城市面板数据,将大气污染联防联控政策视为协同治理模式推行的公共政策实验,考察其对空气质量改善的影响及作用机制。研究结果表明：协同治理模式推行显著改善了城市空气质量,经一系列稳健性检验后结果仍然成立。机制分析发现,协同治理对地方政府绿色转型发挥了制度激励作用,主要体现在促进地方政府产业结构转型、能源结构调整与生产技术创新等。此外,该激励作用在经济发达地区和创新能力较强的省会城市表现尤为明显。拓展性分析发现,建立联席会议制度对地方政府行为产生约束作用,有利于提升大气污染治理效率,但以签订合作协议为主的正式协作行动约束效应较弱。因此,为提高协同治理效益、改善城市空气质量,既要扩大协同治理推行范围,更要加强实质性协作行动、强化配套保障机制,进一步激发制度激励效能与行为约束作用。

关键词: 协同治理, 地方政府绿色转型, 空气质量改善, 联防联控政策

Abstract: It is of great practical significance to construct a modern environmental governance system and accelerate the coordinated governance of local governments. Based on the panel data of 284 prefecture level-and-above cities in China from 2004 to 2019, this paper regards the air pollution joint-prevention and joint-control policy as a public policy experiment implemented by the collaborative governance model to investigate its impact and action mechanism on the improvement of air quality. The results show that the implementation of the collaborative governance model has significantly improved urban air quality, which is still valid after a series of robustness tests. The findings of a mechanism analysis show that the collaborative governance plays an institutional incentive role in promoting the green transformation of local governments, which is mainly reflected in promoting the transformation of local governments' industrial structures, energy structure adjustments and production technology innovations. In addition, this incentive effect is particularly obvious in economically developed areas and provincial capital cities with strong innovation ability. The results of an extensive analysis show that the establishment of a joint meeting system has a restrictive effect on the behavior of local governments, which is conducive to improving the efficiency of air pollution control, but the restrictive effect of formal cooperative action dominated by signing cooperation agreements is relatively weak. Therefore, in order to improve the efficiency of the collaborative governance and improve urban air quality, we should not only expand the implementation scope of the collaborative governance, but also strengthen the substantive collaborative action and reinforce the supporting guarantee mechanism, so as to further stimulate the institutional incentive efficiency and the behavior restraints.

Key words: collaborative governance, green transformation of local governments, air quality improvement, joint-defense and joint-control policy

中图分类号:

F062.6

赵一心, 缪小林. 协同治理、地方政府绿色转型与空气质量改善[J]. 当代财经, 2022, 0(3): 40-52.

ZHAO Yi-xin, MIAO Xiao-lin. Collaborative Governance, Local Governments' Green Transformation and Air Quality Improvement[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2022, 0(3): 40-52.

参考文献

[1] 马捷,锁利铭.城市间环境治理合作:行动、网络及其演变——基于长三角30个城市的府际协议数据分析[J].中国行政管理,2019,(9):41-49.
[2] 胡志高,李光勤,曹建华.环境规制视角下的区域大气污染联合治理——分区方案设计、协同状态评价及影响因素分析[J].中国工业经济,2019,(5):24-42.
[3] Xue J.,Zhao L.,Fan L.,Qian Y.An Interprovincial Cooperative Game Model for Air Pollution Control in China[J].Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association,2015,65(7): 818-827.
[4] 王恰,郑世林.“2+26”城市联合防治行动对京津冀地区大气污染物浓度的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2019,(9):51-62.
[5] Liu Y.,Wu J.N.,Yi H. T.,Wen J. Under What Conditions Do Governments Collaborate?A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Air Pollution Control in China[J].Public Management:An International Journal of Research and Theory,2021,23(2): 1-20.
[6] 李辉,黄雅卓,徐美宵,周颖.“避害型”府际合作何以可能?——基于京津冀大气污染联防联控的扎根理论研究[J].公共管理学报,2020,(4):53-61+109+168.
[7] 金刚,沈坤荣.以邻为壑还是以邻为伴?——环境规制执行互动与城市生产率增长[J]. 管理世界,2018,(12):43-55.
[8] 邓慧慧,杨露鑫.雾霾治理、地方竞争与工业绿色转型[J].中国工业经济,2019,(10):118-136.
[9] 李胜兰,初善冰,申晨.地方政府竞争、环境规制与区域生态效率[J].世界经济,2014,(4):88-110.
[10] 张振波.从逐底竞争到策略性模仿——绩效考核生态化如何影响地方政府环境治理的竞争策略?[J]. 公共行政评论,2020,(6):114-131+211-212.
[11] 孙涛,温雪梅.动态演化视角下区域环境治理的府际合作网络研究——以京津冀大气治理为例[J].中国行政管理,2018,(5):83-89.
[12] Olson M.The Logic of Collective Action:Public Goods and the Theory of Groups[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1965.
[13] 陈诗一,陈登科.雾霾污染、政府治理与经济高质量发展[J]. 经济研究,2018,(2):20-34.
[14] 宋弘,孙雅洁,陈登科.政府空气污染治理效应评估——来自中国“低碳城市”建设的经验研究[J]. 管理世界,2019,(6):95-108+195.
[15] 寇宗来,刘学悦.中国城市和产业创新力报告2017[R].上海:复旦大学产业发展研究中心,2017.
[16] 上官绪明,葛斌华.地方政府税收竞争、环境治理与雾霾污染[J].当代财经,2019,(5):27-36.
[17] 周晓博,马天明.基于国家治理视角的中央环保督察有效性研究[J].当代财经,2020,(2):27-39.
[18] Jacobson L.,LaLonde R.,Sullivan D. Earning Losses of Displaced Workers[J].The American Economic Review, 1993,83(4): 685.
[19] 陆铭,冯皓.集聚与减排:城市规模差距影响工业污染强度的经验研究[J].世界经济,2014,(7):86-114.
[20] 杨龙. 地方政府合作的动力、过程与机制[J].中国行政管理,2008,(7):96-99.
[21] 锁利铭,阚艳秋,李雪.制度性集体行动、领域差异与府际协作治理[J]. 公共管理与政策评论,2020,(4):3-14.