国债收益率曲线的货币政策传导渠道：理论机制与中国经验

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 全球经济下行压力不断累积,预示着中国可能长期处于低利率环境,因此需加强货币政策对国债收益率曲线的引导,以发挥长期利率的调控作用。理论分析表明,中国现行的货币政策框架已具备通过信号渠道和资产组合平衡渠道向国债收益率曲线传导的操作条件;实证结果进一步证实了两种渠道传导的有效性。具体来看,信号渠道比资产组合平衡渠道的传导效应更强;信号渠道的作用是短期的,其方向与货币政策目标一致,而资产组合平衡渠道的作用是长期的,其方向短期内与货币政策目标相反,在中长期与货币政策目标一致;两种渠道在货币政策宽松期的传导效应较弱,在货币政策紧缩期的传导效应较强,表现出显著的非对称特征。建议中国人民银行优化基于信号渠道和资产组合平衡渠道的货币政策传导机制,打通以国债收益率曲线为核心的利率传导路径。

关键词: 低利率环境, 货币政策, 国债收益率曲线, 信号渠道, 资产组合平衡渠道

Abstract: The continuous accumulation of downward pressure in the global economy indicates that China may stay in a low interest rate environment for a long time. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the guidance of monetary policy for the treasury yield curve, so as to let long-term interest rate play the role of regulation. The results of the theoretical analysis show that China's current monetary policy framework has possessed the operational conditions to transmit to the treasury yield curve through the signaling channel and the portfolio balance channel. The empirical results further confirm the effectiveness of the two channels in the transmission. Specifically, the transmission effect through the signaling channel is stronger than that through the portfolio balance channel. The role of the signaling channel is short-term, and its direction is consistent with the goal of monetary policy; while the role of the portfolio balance channel is long-term, its direction is opposite to the goal of monetary policy in the short term, and is consistent with the goal of monetary policy in the medium and long term. The transmission effect of the two channels is weaker in the easing period of monetary policy, but stronger in the tightening period of monetary policy, which shows significant asymmetric characteristics. It is suggested that the People's Bank of China should optimize the monetary policy transmission mechanism of both the signaling channel and the portfolio balance channel and open up the interest rate transmission path with the treasure yield curve as the core.

Key words: low interest rate environment, monetary policy, treasury yield curve, signaling channel, portfolio balance channel

中图分类号:

F830

关禹, 王雪标. 国债收益率曲线的货币政策传导渠道：理论机制与中国经验[J]. 当代财经, 2022, 0(1): 53-65.

GUAN Yu, WANG Xue-biao. The Transmission Channels of Monetary Policy of Treasury Yield Curve: Theoretical Mechanism and China's Experiences[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2022, 0(1): 53-65.

参考文献

[1] 易纲. 中国改革开放三十年的利率市场化进程[J]. 金融研究,2009,(1):1-14.
[2] 李艳丽. 价格型货币政策中介目标向国债收益率曲线传导有效性研究[J]. 国际金融研究,2018,(11):25-34.
[3] 林木材,牛霖琳. 基于高频收益率曲线的中国货币政策传导分析[J]. 经济研究,2020,(2):101-116.
[4] 李成,王东阳. 利率市场化进程中的货币政策调控转型[J]. 当代财经,2020,(8):54-65.
[5] 易纲. 中国的利率体系与利率市场化改革[J]. 金融研究,2021,(9):1-11.
[6] Gagnon J., Raskin M., Remache J., Sack B.The Financial Market Effects of the Federal Reserve's Large-Scale Asset Purchases[J]. International Journal of Central Banking, 2011, 7(1): 3-43.
[7] Christensen J.H. E., Rudebusch G. D. The Response of Interest Rates to US and UK Quantitative Easing[J]. The Economic Journal, 2012, 122(564): 385-414.
[8] Bauer M.D., Rudebusch G. D. The Signaling Channel for Federal Reserve Bond Purchases[J]. International Journal of Central Banking, 2014, 10(3): 233-289.
[9] Lloyd S.P. Unconventional Monetary Policy and the Interest Rate Channel: Signaling and Portfolio Rebalancing[R]. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, No.1735, 2017.
[10] 潘敏,夏庆,张华华. 货币政策周期与国债利率期限结构[J]. 财贸研究,2012,(1):1-26.
[11] 关禹,王雪标,孙光林. 货币政策对国债利率期限结构的影响机制——基于预期渠道和溢价渠道双重视角的实证分析[J]. 当代财经,2019a,(1):47-59.
[12] Hamilton J.D., Wu J. C. The Effectiveness of Alternative Monetary Policy Tools in a Zero Lower Bound Environment[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2012, 44(1): 3-46.
[13] Joyce M., Lasaosa A., Stevens I., Tong M.The Financial Market Impact of Quantitative Easing in the United Kingdom[J]. International Journal of Central Banking, 2011, 7(3): 113-161.
[14] 马理,段中元,杨嘉懿. 后金融危机时期公开市场操作的新动态与文献述评[J]. 国际金融研究,2013,(11):16-26.
[15] 李宏瑾,项卫星. 中央银行基准利率、公开市场操作与间接货币调控——对央票操作及其基准利率作用的实证分析[J]. 财贸经济,2010,(4):13-19.
[16] Mishkin F.S. Monetary Policy Strategy: Lessons From The Crisis[R]. NBER Working Papers, No.16755, 2011.
[17] Friedman B.M., Kuttner K. N. Implementation of Monetary Policy: How Do Central Banks Set Interest Rates?[R]. NBER Working Papers, No.16165, 2010.
[18] Sims E., Wu J.C. Evaluating Central Banks’ Tool Kit: Past, Present, and Future[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2020, 118(3): 135-160.
[19] 马理,何梦泽,刘艺. 基于适应性预期的货币政策传导研究[J]. 金融研究,2016,(8):19-33.
[20] 郭豫媚,陈伟泽,陈彦斌. 中国货币政策有效性下降与预期管理研究[J]. 经济研究,2016,(1):28-41.
[21] 关禹,王雪标,宇超逸. 公众长短期预期的差异与货币政策引导效应[J]. 当代经济科学,2019b,(3):72-82.
[22] 徐亚平. 公众学习、预期引导与货币政策的有效性[J]. 金融研究,2009,(1):50-65.
[23] 邹文理,王曦,谢小平. 中央银行沟通的金融市场响应——基于股票市场的事件研究[J]. 金融研究,2020,(2):34-50.
[24] 闫先东,高文博. 中央银行信息披露与通货膨胀预期管理——我国央行信息披露指数的构建与实证检验[J]. 金融研究,2017,(8):35-49.
[25] 谈正达,霍良安. 无套利Nelson-Siegel模型在中国国债市场的实证分析[J]. 中国管理科学,2012,(6):18-27.
[26] Christensen J.H. E., Diebold F. X., Rudebusch G. D. The Affine Arbitrage-Free Class of Nelson-Siegel Term Structure Models[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2011, 164(1): 4-20.
[27] Kim D.H., Orphanides A. Term Structure Estimation with Survey Data on Interest Rate Forecasts[J]. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 2012, 47(1): 241-272.
[28] Bauer M.D., Rudebusch G. D., Wu J. C. Correcting Estimation Bias in Dynamic Term Structure Models[J]. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2012, 30(3): 454-467.
[29] 刘廷华. 商业信用对企业技术创新的影响研究[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,2021.
[30] Kung H.Macroeconomic Linkages between Monetary Policy and the Term Structure of Interest Rates[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, 115(1): 42-57.