中国制造企业响应“一带一路”倡议对企业绩效的影响研究

当代财经 ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 77-89.

中国制造企业响应“一带一路”倡议对企业绩效的影响研究

宋渊洋¹, 赵嘉欣²

1.华东理工大学商学院,上海 200237;
2.中山大学管理学院,广东广州 510275

收稿日期:2020-12-07 出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-05-31
通讯作者: 赵嘉欣,中山大学博士研究生,主要从事战略管理和创新创业研究,联系方式zhaojx58@mail2.sysu.edu.cn。
作者简介:宋渊洋,华东理工大学副教授,博士,主要从事战略管理和国际商务研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“东道国社会信任、海外子公司治理结构设计及绩效的关系研究”（71772062）

A Study on the Effect of China's Manufacturing Enterprises Responding to the“Belt and Road”Initiative on Corporate Performance

SONG Yuan-yang¹, ZHAO Jia-xin²

1. East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237;
2. Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received:2020-12-07 Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-05-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于中国制造业上市公司的数据,探讨企业响应“一带一路”倡议对企业绩效的影响及其机理。研究发现：与不在“一带一路”国家设立子公司的企业相比,在“一带一路”国家设有子公司的企业绩效更好;企业在“一带一路”国家设立子公司的速度越快、设有的子公司的数量越多,企业绩效越好。进一步分析发现,响应“一带一路”倡议对企业绩效的正向影响在“一带一路”倡议提出阶段比制度化实施阶段更强。在使用工具变量法控制内生性以及进行多个稳健性测试后,仍能得到一致的结论。上述结论揭示了企业响应“一带一路”倡议的经济后果,不仅有助于拓展企业政治战略的相关研究,而且对企业构建良好的政企关系以及政府更有效地实施国家大政方针有重要启示。

关键词: “一带一路”倡议, 企业绩效, 响应国家大政方针, 企业政治战略

Abstract: Based on the data of Chinese manufacturing listed companies, this paper explores the impact of enterprises' response to the“Belt and Road”initiative on their performance and its mechanism. The results show that compared with firms without subsidiaries in the“Belt and Road”countries, firms with subsidiaries in the “Belt and Road”countries enjoy better performance. The quicker a firm sets up subsidiaries, and the more subsidiaries in the“Belt and Road”countries, the better performance the firm has. Further analysis indicates that the positive influence of response to the “Belt and Road”initiative on firms' performance is stronger at the proposal stage of the“Belt and Road”initiative than at the institutionalized implementation stage. After using the instrumental variable method to control the endogeneity and conducting multiple robustness tests, the results are consistent with the main findings. The above conclusions reveal the economic consequences of firms' responding to the“Belt and Road”initiative, which not only helps to expand the related researches on corporate political strategies, but also has important implications for firms to build better firm-government relationship and for the government to implement national foundational policies more effectively.

Key words: Belt and Road, corporate performance, response to national policies, corporate political strategy

中图分类号:

F272.3

宋渊洋, 赵嘉欣. 中国制造企业响应“一带一路”倡议对企业绩效的影响研究[J]. 当代财经, 2021, 0(5): 77-89.

SONG Yuan-yang, ZHAO Jia-xin. A Study on the Effect of China's Manufacturing Enterprises Responding to the“Belt and Road”Initiative on Corporate Performance[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2021, 0(5): 77-89.

参考文献

[1] 李伟. 坚定信心主动作为在深化合作中不断创造“一带一路”发展新机遇[J].管理世界,2017,(1):2-4.
[2] 潘越,戴亦一,李财喜.政治关联与财务困境公司的政府补助——来自中国ST公司的经验证据[J]. 南开管理评论,2009,(5):6-17.
[3] 王竹泉,韩星佳.企业的政府社会资本禀赋对融资约束的影响研究——资源配置中政府作用的资本市场证据[J]. 当代财经,2018,(10):68-79.
[4] 田志龙,高勇强,卫武.中国企业政治策略与行为研究[J].管理世界,2003,(12):98-106.
[5] Sun P., Hu H.W., Hillman A. J. The Dark Side of Board Political Capital: Enabling Blockholder Rent Appropriation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2016, 59(5): 1801-1822.
[6] 张述存. “一带一路”战略下优化中国对外直接投资布局的思路与对策[J].管理世界,2017,(4):1-9.
[7] 刘志彪,吴福象.“一带一路”倡议下全球价值链的双重嵌入[J].中国社会科学,2018,(8):17-32.
[8] Oliver C.Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16(1): 145-179.
[9] 熊会兵,肖文韬,邓新明.企业政治战略与经济绩效:基于合法性视角[J].中国工业经济,2010,(10):138-147.
[10] Yu T., Lester R.H. Moving Beyond Firm Boundaries: A Social Network Perspective on Reputation Spillover[J]. Corporate Reputation Review, 2008, 11(1): 94-108.
[11] 宋渊洋,黄礼伟.为什么中国企业难以国内跨地区经营?[J].管理世界,2014,(12):115-133.
[12] 田志龙,邓新明.企业政治策略形成影响因素——中国经验[J].南开管理评论,2007,(1):81-90.
[13] 孙金彦,刘海云.“一带一路”战略背景下中国贸易潜力的实证研究[J].当代财经,2016,(6):99-106.
[14] Cuypers I.R. P., Koh P. S., Wang H. Sincerity in Corporate Philanthropy, Stakeholder Perceptions and Firm Value[J]. Organization Science, 2016, 27(1): 173-188.
[15] 邓子梁,原晓惠.制度距离对银行海外经营效率的影响:基于“一带一路”沿线国家外资银行的实证分析[J].中国软科学,2018,(4):43-53.
[16] Holm P.The Dynamics of Institutionalization: Transformation Processes in Norwegian Fisheries[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(3): 398-422.
[17] 王桂军,卢潇潇.“一带一路”倡议可以促进中国企业创新吗?[J].财经研究,2019,(1):19-34.
[18] Lu J.W., Song Y., Shan M. Social Trust in Subnational Regions and Foreign Subsidiary Performance: Evidence From Foreign Investments in China[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2018, 49(6): 761-773.
[19] 李杰义,闫静波,王重鸣.海外网络嵌入性、国际学习与国际化速度[J].科学学研究,2019,(1):121-129.
[20] Young M.N., Peng M. W., Ahlstrom D., Bruton G. D., Jiang Y. Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies: A Review of the Principal-Principal Perspective[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008, 45(1): 196-220.
[21] Peterson M.F., Arregle J. L., Martin X. Multilevel Models in International Business Research[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2012, 43(5): 451-457.
[22] Cameron A.C., Miller D. L. Robust Inference with Clustered Data[M]// Ullah A., Giles D. E. Handbook of Empirical Economics and Finance. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2010.
[23] Roberts M.R., Whited T. M. Endogeneity in Empirical Corporate Finance[M]// Constantinides G. M., Harris M., Stulz R. M. Handbook of the Economics of Finance. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013.
[24] 陈胜蓝,刘晓玲.公司投资如何响应“一带一路”倡议?——基于准自然实验的经验研究[J].财经研究,2018,(4):20-33.
[25] Gooderham P.N., Morley M. J., Parry E., Stavrou E. National and Firm-level Drivers of the Devolution of HRM Decision Making to Line Managers[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2015, 46(6): 715-723.
[26] Li J., Xia J., Zajac E.J. On the Duality of Political and Economic Stakeholder Influence on Firm Innovation Performance: Theory and Evidence from Chinese Firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(1): 193-216.