当代财经 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (03): 10-.

• • 上一篇    

地方政府隐性债务:边界、分类估算及治理路径

李丽珍,安秀梅   

  1. (中央财经大学 财政税务学院,北京 100081)
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-28 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:李丽珍,中央财经大学博士研究生,主要从事财税理论与政策研究,通讯作者联系方式351891138@qq.com;安秀梅,中央财经大学教授,博士生导师,博士,主要从事财税理论与政策研究。

Implicit Debt of Local Governments: Boundary, Classified Estimation and Governance Path

LI Li-zhen, AN Xiu-mei   

  1. (Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Received:2018-11-28 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 党的十八届三中全会明确“财政是国家治理的基础和重要支柱”。作为地方财政风险最主要来源的地方政府隐性债务,其治理将事关国家治理能力的提升,也事关防范化解重大风险攻坚战的成败。厘清地方政府隐性债务的边界、类型及具体表现形式,设定债务风险系数、或有债务转化率、政府负担比例指标,分类估算出2017年地方政府隐性债务规模为9万亿元~15万亿元,包含隐性债务的地方政府性债务风险总体处在安全边界内,但债务风险的地区分布差异显著,个别省份已突破警戒线。近三年地方政府隐性债务风险呈现扩大化趋势,且主要集中于救助责任类债务。因此,治理地方政府隐性债务应遵循“整体性、协调性、系统性”理念,坚持以稳为主、分类施策、激励与问责并举等基本原则,推进养老金全国统筹制度、制定合理的风险共担机制、优化债务主体治理结构、提升财政资金统筹规划能力、落实行政问责制等具体的分类治理路径。

关键词: 地方政府隐性债务,债务边界,债务风险,债务治理

Abstract: It is stated by the Third Plenary Session of the 18th Congress of CPC that finance is the foundation and important pillar of national governance. The risks of local finance mainly come from the implicit debt of local governments, whose governance is related to the improvement of national governance capacity and the success or failure of the fight against the major risks. By clarifying the boundary, types and specific forms of the implicit debt of local governments, and setting the debt risk coefficients, contingent debt conversion rates, and indicators of government burden ratio, this paper makes a classified estimation of the scale of the implicit debt of local governments, which is between 9-15 trillion yuan in 2017; the risk of local government debt including implicit debt is generally within the security boundary, but the regional distribution of debt risks is significantly different, and in some provinces the warning line has been broken through. In the recent three years, the implicit debt of local governments is showing a tendency of expansion, which is mainly centered around the debts of rescue responsibilities. Therefore, the governance of implicit debt of local governments should follow the classified governance path, including the following specific measures, such as insisting on the idea of“integrality, coordination and systematicness,”adhering to the basic principle of giving priority to stability, classified implementation of policies, and combination of both incentives and accountability, pushing forward the national pension scheme, formulating rational risk-sharing mechanisms, optimizing the governance structure of debt entities, improving the overall planning ability of financial funds, implementing the administrative accountability and so on.

Key words: implicit debt of local governments; debt boundary; debt risks; debt governance