当代财经 ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (07): 101-.

• • 上一篇    

制造业投入服务化能提高全要素生产率吗——基于成本和风险的视角

夏秋,胡昭玲   

  1. (南开大学 经济学院/中国特色社会主义经济建设协同创新中心,天津 300071)
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-07 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:夏 秋,南开大学博士研究生,主要从事国际贸易与产品内分工研究,通讯作者联系方式nkxiaqiu@163.com;胡昭玲,南开大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事国际贸易与产品内分工研究。

Can Servitization of Manufacturing Input Improve Total Factor Productivity? From the Perspective of Cost and Risks

XIA Qiu, HU Zhao-ling   

  1. (Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)
  • Received:2018-01-07 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 企业服务化转型中存在的成本与风险问题,可能引发对生产率的负面冲击。基于成本和风险的视角,分析了制造业投入服务化对全要素生产率的非线性影响。运用跨国面板数据的实证结果表明:制造业投入服务化对全要素生产率存在“U型”影响,在制造业投入服务化水平较低时对全要素生产率有抑制作用,经过拐点后对全要素生产率有促进作用,这种先抑制后促进的“U型”效应在发达国家与发展中国家同时存在,“U型”曲线的拐点在制造业投入服务化水平约为83%的位置。各国实施服务化战略时应该循序渐进、重视客户参与、建立风险共担机制,避免盲目服务化调整对经济增长的不利影响。

关键词: 制造业投入服务化,全要素生产率,Malmquist指数法,非线性效应

Abstract: The cost and risk issues in the transformation of enterprise servitization may trigger negative impact on the productivity. From the perspective of cost and risks, this paper analyzes the nonlinear effect of the servitization of manufacturing input on total factor productivity with the cross-country panel data. The empirical results show that the servitization of manufacturing input has “U-shaped” effect on TFP; the lower level of servitization of manufacturing input has an inhibiting effect on TFP, but after passing through the inflection point, it has a positive impact on TFP. This kind of “U-shaped” effect that first inhibiting then promoting exists in both the developed countries and the developing countries; the inflection point on the “U-shape” curve is located around 83% of the servitization of manufacturing input. When implementing the servitization strategy, each country should do it step by step, pay attention to customer participation, establish risk sharing mechanism, and avoid the adverse impact of blind servitization adjustment on economic growth.

Key words: servitization of manufacturing input; TFP; Malmquist Index Method; nonlinear effect