当代财经 ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (06): 119-.

• • 上一篇    

金融发展、财务柔性与公司去杠杆——来自我国上市公司的经验研究

王连军   

  1. (湖南大学 应用经济学博士后流动站,湖南 长沙 410082)
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-17 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:王连军,湖南大学博士后流动站研究人员,湖南商学院财政金融学院讲师,主要从事货币银行学、金融风险管理研究,联系方式wlj9232@126.com。

Financial Development, Financial Flexibility and Corporate Deleveraging: An Empirical Study of China’s Listed Companies

WANG Lian-jun   

  1. (Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)
  • Received:2017-12-17 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 基于我国上市公司2005—2015年的年度数据研究金融发展对我国上市公司去杠杆的影响,结果表明:第一,金融发展程度越高,公司去杠杆幅度也越大,且这种作用机制存在路径依赖,初始杠杆率越低,上市公司越有动机偿还全部债务来储备财务柔性;第二,金融发展程度较低时,公司去杠杆过程中会增加现金持有比重,但随着地区金融发展程度的提高,国有上市公司更多选择清偿债务去杠杆,而非国有上市公司则主要利用内部留存收益主动去杠杆;第三,面板数据模型的调节效应表明,金融发展对国有上市公司去杠杆的影响更大,预算软约束减弱了金融发展对上市公司杠杆率调整的作用效果,但这种调节作用在非国有上市公司及储备财务柔性公司子样本内不显著。为此,最根本的政策在于持续推动供给侧改革,破除市场和计划双轨制,减少制度层面的障碍;同时,营造健康的金融发展环境,优化企业融资结构,大力发展资本市场,提高直接金融比重。

关键词: 金融发展,国有产权,财务柔性,上市公司,去杠杆

Abstract: Based on the annual data of China’s listed companies from 2005 to 2015, this paper studies the impact of financial development on the deleveraging of the listed companies. The results show that, firstly, the higher the level of financial development, the greater the extent of corporate deleveraging. And this kind of function mechanism has path dependence; the lower the initial leverage rate, the more motivated the listed companies to repay all their debts to reserve financial flexibilities. Secondly, when the level of financial development is lower, the companies will increase the proportion of cash holdings in the course of deleveraging. But with the development of regional finance, the state-owned listed companies are more likely to choose to pay off their debts to deleverage, while non-state-owned companies would mainly use their internal retained earnings to deleverage. Thirdly, the regulatory effect of the panel data model shows that financial development has a greater impact on the deleveraging of state-owned companies. The soft budget constraint has weakened the effect of financial development on the leverage adjustment of listed companies, but this effect is not significant in the sub-sample group of non-state-owned companies and the companies with flexible financial reserves. Therefore, the most fundamental policy lies in promoting the supply side reform continuously, getting rid of the market-planning dual-track system, reducing the institutional barriers, while at the same time creating healthy environment for the financial development, optimizing the corporate financing structures, developing the capital markets vigorously, and increasing the proportion of direct finance.

Key words: financial development; financial flexibility; state-owned property; listed companies; corporate deleveraging