当代财经 ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (05): 131-.

• • 上一篇    

基于生命周期与制度变迁逻辑的地方社会治理创新研究

李晓燕   

  1. (广东财经大学 公共管理学院,广东 广州 510320)
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-25 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:李晓燕,广东财经大学副教授,浙江大学公共管理学院博士后,主要从事社会政策、社区治理研究,联系方式xiechangqing2002@163.com。

A Study of the Local Social Governance Innovation Based on the Logic of Life Cycle and Institutional Changes

LI Xiao-yan   

  1. (Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China)
  • Received:2017-12-25 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 新时代呼唤社会治理创新的新格局。自党的十八大以来,伴随社会治理工作的全面推进,地方社会治理创新动力减小,社会治理创新的有效性和持续性不足,“碎片化创新”“趋同式创新”等问题日益凸现,囿于困境中的社会治理创新急需学者的关注和基于问题导向的研究。利用生命周期理论与制度变迁理论,以地方政府创新为中间变量研究社会治理创新,具有一定的逻辑自洽性。因此,重构地方社会治理创新的路径,可以从强化政府的创新本领(强制性制度变迁)和打造共建共治共享的社会治理格局(诱致性制度变迁)两个维度来推进。G区社区营造创新是社会治理创新的典型案例,通过剖析G区社区营造,可以由小及大,帮助我们再次审视社会治理创新逻辑。

关键词: 地方政府,社会治理创新,社区营造,生命周期,制度变迁

Abstract: The new era calls for a new pattern of social governance innovation. Since the Party’s 18th National Congress, along with the overall advancement of social governance, the drive for the local social governance innovation has been reduced, and the effectiveness and sustainability of social governance innovations have been insufficient, and the problems such as “fragmented innovation” and “convergent innovation” have become increasingly prominent. The innovation of social governance is now trapped in a dilemma, which is in urgent need of the attention of the related scholars and the problem-oriented researches. It has certain logic self-consistency to study social governance innovation with local government innovation as an intermediate variable with the help of the theory of life cycle and the theory of institutional changes. Therefore, the reconstruction of the paths for local social governance innovation can be promoted by the two dimensions of strengthening the governments’ innovation capability (compulsory institutional changes) and building a social governance structure of shared governance and shared enjoyment (inductive institutional changes). The creation of community innovation in G district is a typical case of social governance innovation. By analyzing the construction of the community in G districts, it can help us once again to review the logic of social governance innovation from the small to the big.

Key words: local government; social governance innovation; community creation; life cycle; institutional changes