当代财经 ›› 2017, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (10): 218-.

• • 上一篇    

价格黏性、投资调整成本与DSGE模型的传导

仝冰1,习明明2   

  1. (1. 河南大学 经济学院,河南 开封 475000;2. 江西财经大学 江西经济发展与改革研究院,江西 南昌 330013)
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-07 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:仝 冰,河南大学副教授,经济学博士,主要从事宏观经济学研究,通讯作者联系方式bing1046@126.com;习明明,江西财经大学副研究员,经济学博士,主要从事发展经济学研究。

Price Stickiness, Investment Adjustment Costs and DSGE Model Conduction

TONG Bing1, XI Ming-ming2   

  1. (1. Henan University, Kaifeng 475000; 2. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)
  • Received:2017-06-07 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 基于贝叶斯和冲击响应方法,对经典CEE模型中的摩擦性机制进行了评估,判断模型中哪些机制对于分析中国经济是重要的和不可或缺的。首先基于贝叶斯方法,对剔除不同摩擦性因素的CEE模型进行贝叶斯估计,比较其边缘似然函数,发现对中国数据解释力最强的模型机制是价格黏性和投资调整成本,其次是习惯形成和工资黏性,而资本利用率调整成本、价格和工资的指数化因素则并不重要。最后基于冲击响应方法,考察CEE模型对货币、技术和政府支出等三种冲击的响应曲线,进一步证实了贝叶斯评估的结论。

关键词: DSGE模型,价格黏性,投资调整成本,贝叶斯方法,冲击响应分析

Abstract: Based on the Bayesian method and shock response method, this paper conducts an assessment of the friction mechanism in the classical CEE model, so as to determine which mechanisms in the model are important and indispensable for the analysis of the Chinese economy. Based on the Bayesian method, it firstly carries out a Bayesian estimation of CEE model when different frictional factors are removed. Compared with its edge likelihood function, it is found that the model mechanism with the strongest explanatory power to Chinese data is price stickiness and investment adjustment cost, followed by formation of habit and wage stickiness, while such factors as capital utilization adjustment costs, price and wage index are not important. Finally, based on the shock response method, it examines the response curves of the three impacts of CEE model on money, technology and government expenditure, the findings can further confirm the conclusion drawn from the Bayesian evaluation.

Key words: DSGE model; price stickiness; investment adjustment cost; Bayesian method; shock response analysis