当代财经 ›› 2017, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (10): 212-.

• • 上一篇    

产品关联与中国区域比较优势结构演化

吴小康1,郑莹2   

  1. (1. 南京大学 中美文化研究中心,江苏 南京 210093 2. 南京工业大学 经济与管理学院,江苏 南京 211800)
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-24 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:吴小康,南京大学中美文化研究中心助理研究员,南京大学经济学院博士后,南京大学亚太发展研究院研究员,主要从事国际贸易理论研究,通讯作者联系方式wuxk@hnc.nju.edu.cn;郑 莹,南京工业大学讲师,博士,主要从事国际商务与知识产权研究。

Product Connection and Structural Evolution of Regional Comparative Advantages in China

WU Xiao-kang1, ZHENG Ying2   

  1. (1. Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093; 2. Nanjing University of Technoligy, Nanjing 211800, China)
  • Received:2017-07-24 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 使用BACI全球贸易数据库和2000—2006年的中国海关数据库,研究了产品关联度对中国区域比较优势结构演化的影响。研究表明,尽管研究时期不长,但各区域比较优势结构经历了明显变化。2000年有比较优势的区域-产品对只有50%在2006年仍保持比较优势,2000年没有比较优势的区域-产品对在2006年有10%获得了比较优势。产品关联度是解释比较优势结构变化的重要因素。在控制6位数产品和4位数产品-地区固定效应后,一种产品在2000年与其所在省份出口的其他产品之间的关联越紧密,这种产品在2006年成为有比较优势产品的概率越高。

关键词: 产品关联度,比较优势,产业结构演化

Abstract: This paper studies the influence of product connection on the structural evolution of regional comparative advantages in China by making use of the BACI global trade database and China customs database from 2000 to 2006. The findings indicate that though the research period is not long enough, the structures of the comparative advantages in different regions have experienced significant changes during this period. Only 50 percent of the region-product combinations which had comparative advantages in 2000 still held comparative advantages in 2006, while 10 percent of the region-product combinations which had no comparative advantage in 2000 acquired comparative advantages in 2006. Product connection is an important factor which can explain the changes of comparative advantage structure. After controlling the fixed effects between the 6-digit products or 4-digit products and the regions, if one product had a closer relation with the other products exported by the same province in 2000, this product would have higher probability to become a product with comparative advantages in 2006.

Key words: degree of product connection; comparative advantage; industry structural evolution