当代财经 ›› 2017, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (05): 279-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

社会经济地位与社区邻避效应:基于城市市民对新生代农民工的观察视角

李兴华1,蔡万焕2,陈明3   

  1. (1. 南京大学 社会学院,江苏 南京 210023;2. 清华大学 马克思主义学院,北京 100084;3. 南京财经大学 教务处,江苏 南京 210023)
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-05 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:李兴华,南京大学博士研究生,江苏省发展和改革委员会助理研究员,主要从事经济社会学研究;蔡万焕,清华大学特别研究员,博士生导师,主要从事中国特色社会主义政治经济学研究;陈 明,南京财经大学教务处副处长,主要从事邻避行为研究,通讯作者联系方式pink_chen@163.com。

Socioeconomic Status and Community NIMBY Effect: A Perspective of Urban Citizens on the New Generation of Migrant Workers

LI Xing-hua1, CAI Wan-huan2, CHEN Ming3   

  1. (1. Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023; 2. Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084; 3. Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China)
  • Received:2017-01-05 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 以城市调查数据为样本,测算了城市市民对新生代农民工的社区邻避效应,并重点探讨了城市市民社会经济地位对新生代农民工社区邻避效应的影响作用及其传导路径。结果表明:(1)城市市民对新生代农民工存在18.4%的社区邻避效应广度。(2)具备女性、有婚姻经历、有生育经历(特别是孩子尚未成年)、当地城市籍贯、年龄更大和在城市居住时间更长这六个社会人口学属性的城市市民,会拥有更高的社区邻避效应发生概率。(3)城市市民受教育程度、家庭年总收入、工作单位稳定程度和主观社会经济地位等社会经济地位的提高,总体上会显著提升社区邻避效应的发生概率。(4)城市市民对新生代农民工的部分评价在其社会经济地位对社区邻避效应的影响中发挥了中介作用。通过积极的交往和必要的帮扶,提升城市市民在个人品质评价和社会贡献评价上对新生代农民工的看法,是破解城市市民高社会经济地位与高社区邻避倾向之间正相关关系的关键所在。

关键词: 社区邻避效应,社会经济地位,城市市民,新生代农民工,中介效应

Abstract: Taking the urban survey data as the sample, this paper measures the community not-in-my-back-yard effect of the urban residents on the new generation of migrant workers and focuses on the influence of the urban residents’ social and economic status on the community NIMBY effect of the new generation of migrant workers as well as its transmission route. The results show that: (1) the urban residents have a 18.4% range of the community NIMBY effect on the new generation of migrant workers; (2) urban residents with such six social demography attributes as women, marital experiences, fertility experiences (especially their children are not yet grown up), local urban native, older age and longer time in urban life would have higher probability of occurrence of the community NIMBY effect; (3) with the improvement of such social and economic status as urban citizens’ education level, family gross annual income, work unit stability and subjective socioeconomic status, the probability of occurrence of community NIMBY effect would be significantly increased in general; and (4) part of the evaluation made by urban residents on the new generation of migrant workers is playing an intermediary role in the influence of their socioeconomic status on the community NIMBY effect. Through positive exchanges and necessary help, to improve the urban residents’ opinion towards the new generation of migrant workers in terms of personal quality evaluation and social contribution evaluation would be the key to break the positive correlation between the higher socioeconomic status of the urban residents and the higher tendency of community not-in-my-back-yard.

Key words: community NIMBY effect; socioeconomic status; urban citizens; new generation of migrant workers; intermediate effect