当代财经 ›› 2015, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (09): 528-.

• • 上一篇    

售后市场垄断:成因、效率与政策争议——西方的研究与实践及中国的政策难点

吴昌南   

  1. (江西财经大学 产业经济研究院, 江西 南昌 330013)
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-09 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:吴昌南,江西财经大学教授,主要从事产业组织与创新研究,联系方式wuchnan@sohu.com。

Aftermarket Monopoly: Cause, Efficiency and Policy Controversy Western Researches and Practice and China’s Policy Difficulties

WU Chang-nan   

  1. (Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang 330013,China)
  • Received:2015-01-09 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 在当前产品市场竞争日益激烈的情况下,售后市场垄断已成为许多厂商重要的经营模式。国外关于售后市场垄断的研究早在二十世纪八九十年代就已开始,并产生了较为丰富的文献。主要研究集中于售后市场含义及垄断形成原因、售后市场垄断的动因、售后市场垄断的定价、售后市场垄断的效率及反垄断政策争议。尽管中国近年来开展了针对汽车售后市场的反垄断政策,但并没有完全找到实施售后市场反垄断政策的理论依据。因此,我国实施售后市场反垄断政策还需要解决若干理论与实践难点。

关键词: 售后市场,垄断,政策争议

Abstract: In the context of the present increasingly severe market competition on products, the aftermarket monopoly has become an important operation mode for many manufacturers. The researches on the aftermarket monopoly have been carried since early in the 1980s and 1990s in foreign countries, and abundant literatures have been produced. The major studies focus on the meaning of aftermarket, the causes of aftermarket monopoly, the motivation of aftermarket monopoly, the pricing of aftermarket monopoly, the efficiency of aftermarket monopoly, and the controversy over antitrust policies. Although China recently has carried out antitrust policy against the automotive aftermarket, no theoretic basis has been really found for the implementation of antitrust policy in the aftermarket. Therefore, there are certain theoretic and practical difficulties to be solved for the implementation of the aftermarket antitrust policy in China.

Key words: aftermarket; monopoly; policy controversy