当代财经 ›› 2015, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (06): 557-.

• • 上一篇    

结构转换能力与专业化模式变迁——基于金砖四国出口数据的比较分析

祝树金,李仁宇,江鸣   

  1. (湖南大学 经济与贸易学院,湖南 长沙 410079)
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-24 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:祝树金,湖南大学教授,博士生导师,经济学博士,主要从事国际贸易、技术进步与产业发展研究;李仁宇,湖南大学博士研究生,主要从事贸易质量和贸易增长研究,联系方式renyu0120@163.com;江 鸣,湖南大学硕士研究生,主要从事贸易质量与产业发展研究。

Capability of Structural Transformation and Evolution of Specialization Patterns: A Comparative Analysis Based on BRIC’s Export Data

ZHU Shu-jin, LI Ren-yu, JIANG Ming   

  1. (Hunan University, Changsha 410079, China)
  • Received:2014-12-24 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 采用HS(1992)六位数出口数据,选择美国作为比较基准国,对金砖四国的结构转换能力与专业化模式变迁进行比较,实证检验了结构转换能力对专业化模式的影响。研究发现:与美国相比,金砖四国现有专业化模式层次相对较低,结构转换能力不够强;中印两国在专业化模式及演进上具有较多相似性;中国结构转换能力相对较强,其次是印度,而巴西和俄罗斯的结构转换能力不断下降;未来金砖四国在技术复杂度高的产品部门有较多潜在优势产品,但目前结构转换能力与转换空间不够一致。

关键词: 金砖四国,比较优势,结构转换,技术复杂度,潜在优势产品

Abstract: By adopting HS (1992) six-digit export data and taking U.S.A as a benchmark country, this paper makes a comparison between the structure transformation capability and the evolution of specialization patterns of BRIC countries, so as to empirically test the impact of the structure transformation capability on the specialization patterns. The result shows that, compared with the U.S.A, the existing levels of their specialization patterns are relatively lower and their structure transformation capabilities are relatively weaker. China and India have many similarities in the specialization patterns and the evolution process. China’s capability of structure transformation is relatively stronger, followed by India, but the capabilities of Brazil and Russia are declining. In the future, BRIC countries will have more “products with potential advantages” in the sectors with higher level of technical sophistication. At present, however, their capabilities of structure transformation are not consistent with the transformation space.

Key words: BRIC; comparative advantage; structural transformation; technical sophistication; products with potential advantages