当代财经 ›› 2015, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (05): 575-.

• • 上一篇    

系统风险β系数可靠性分析

王兴运1a,白钦先1b   

  1. (1. 辽宁大学 a. 经济学院;b. 国际金融研究所;辽宁 沈阳 110036)
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-14 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:王兴运,辽宁大学讲师,博士,主要从事金融市场研究,联系方式luckyli2005@sina.com;白钦先,辽宁大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事金融体制比较、政策性金融及金融可持续发展研究。

A Reliability Analysis of the Systematic Risk β Coefficient

WANG Xing-yun, BAI Qin-xian   

  1. (Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)
  • Received:2015-02-14 Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 重新定义β系数的稳定性、时变性并对其进行统计衡量,使用经典CAPM和条件CAPM做两阶段计量检验,都可得出风险β系数不可靠的结论。在加入更多解释变量后的检验结果则是模型显著,风险β系数显著,而其他解释变量的显著性在个股和行业中具有差异性,且这种差异性目前没有发现可以识别的方法。风险β系数不可靠的原因在于当前收益率的决定因素应该是能够反映未来的奈特不确定性,基于历史数据的方法并不能解释当前和未来收益。

关键词: 风险β系数,可靠性,条件CAPM,奈特不确定性

Abstract: This paper redefines the stability and time-varying characteristics of risk β-coefficient and conducts a statistic measurement on them. Through a two stage econometric test with both the classic CAPM and the conditional CAPM, a conclusion can be drawn that the risk β-coefficient is not reliable. The test result with more explaining variables shows that both the Model and its risk β coefficient are more significant; while the significance of other explaining variables is different in individual shares and in the industry, and no method has been found to identify this difference. The reason why the risk β coefficient is not reliable is that the decisive factor of the present yield rate should be able to reflect the future Knight Uncertainty, the method based on historic data cannot explain the present and future earnings.

Key words: risk β coefficient; reliability; conditional CAPM; Knight Uncertainty