江西财经大学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 102-113.

• “三农”研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

农业生产性服务提高了粮食产量吗

卢华1a, 胡浩2, 陈苏1b   

  1. 1.江西财经大学 a.生态文明研究院,b.中国农业农村现代化研究院,江西 南昌 330013;
    2.南京农业大学 经济管理学院,江苏 南京 210095
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-18 修回日期:2022-11-20 发布日期:2023-02-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈苏,江西财经大学副教授,管理学博士,主要从事农业经济研究,联系方式chensu@jxufe.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:卢华,江西财经大学副教授,经济学博士,主要从事农业经济研究;胡浩,南京农业大学教授,经济学博士,主要从事农业经济和畜牧业经济研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目“农户异质性视角下农地流转和地权稳定与耕地休养行为研究”(71803071); 国家自然科学基金地区项目“南方多熟制粮区小农户化肥减量化行为及干预效果的实证研究”(72063014); 江西省社会科学“十三五”规划项目“促进新型农村集体经济发展研究”(19YJ17)

Do Agricultural Production Services Increase Grain Yield

LU Hua1, HU Hao2, CHEN Su1   

  1. 1. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nan Chang 330013;
    2. Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
  • Received:2022-07-18 Revised:2022-11-20 Published:2023-02-15

摘要: 基于理论阐述农业生产性服务影响粮食产量的逻辑机理,利用农户微观调查数据和计量经济方法,定量估计不同环节农业生产性服务对粮食单产的影响,并对其影响机制进行实证检验。研究表明,第一,农机服务和施肥服务能显著提高粮食单产,以技术替代为主的施肥服务对粮食单产的影响效应更大。施肥和施药服务对规模经营户的粮食单产具有显著促进作用。第二,施肥和施药服务对农户采纳亲环境的施肥技术和病虫害防治技术具有显著促进作用。第三,农机服务、施药服务和施肥服务对农业劳动力投入具有明显的替代效应,能显著促进规模经营户转入土地,但没有证据表明农机服务和施药服务对小农户转入土地有显著影响。上述结论意味着,未来中国应大力推动农业生产性服务组织发展,对标准化程度低和道德风险发生概率较高的施肥和施药环节加强政策支持,降低服务作业成本,更好地发挥其对粮食增产和农户亲环境农业技术采纳的促进作用。

关键词: 农业生产性服务, 粮食单产, 替代效应, 农业新技术, 农地转入

Abstract: Based on the theories, this paper expounds the logic mechanism of the impact of agricultural production services on grain yield and quantitatively estimates the impact of agricultural production services at different links on the grain yield per unit area by using the micro-survey data and the econometric method. Then it empirically tests the influencing mechanism. The results reveal that, firstly, fertilization service and agricultural machinery service can significantly increase the grain yield per unit area, and that the fertilization service mainly with technological substitution has a greater effect on grain yield per unit area. Fertilization service and pesticide service have significant promotive effect on the grain yield per unit area of large-scale operation farmers. Secondly, the fertilization and pesticide services can significantly promote farmers to adopt pro-environment fertilization technology and pest control technology. Thirdly, agricultural machinery service, fertilization service and pesticide service have obvious substitution effect on agricultural labor input, and can significantly promote the farmers with large-scale business to transfer farmland into their operation, but no evidence is found to prove that the agricultural machinery service and the fertilization service have significant influence on the farmland transfer of small farmers. The above conclusions imply that, in the future, China should vigorously promote the development of agricultural production service organizations, strengthen the policy support for the fertilization and pesticide links with lower standardization degree and higher probability of moral hazard, reduce the cost of service operation, and give better play to its role in promoting grain yield and farmers' adoption of the pro-environment agricultural technologies.

Key words: agricultural production services, the per unit area yield of grain, substitution effect, new agricultural technology, land transfer.

中图分类号: