新发展理念下的政府治理效率评价：“尽力而为”还是“量力而行”

江西财经大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 22-34.

新发展理念下的政府治理效率评价：“尽力而为”还是“量力而行”

段培新¹, 孟溦²

1.山东财经大学公共管理学院,山东济南 250014;
2.华东师范大学公共管理学院/全球创新与发展研究院,上海 200062

收稿日期:2021-09-18 出版日期:2022-07-25 发布日期:2022-08-10
通讯作者: 孟溦,华东师范大学教授,主要从事绩效评估理论与方法、公共政策分析研究,联系方式wmeng@cpa.ecnu.edu.cn。
作者简介:段培新,山东财经大学讲师,博士,主要从事公共部门绩效评价、公共政策分析研究
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目“科学基金项目规模收益及最优规模项目特征研究”（71904105）; 山东省重点研发计划（软科学）项目“改革开放以来山东省科技创新政策的演进路径与系统剖析”（2020RKB01369）

Evaluation of Government Governance Efficiency under the New Development Concept:“Do One'sBest”or“Do According to One's Ability”

DUAN Pei-xin¹, MENG Wei²

1. Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014;
2. East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062. China

Received:2021-09-18 Online:2022-07-25 Published:2022-08-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 政府治理效率提升是推动治理体系建立和治理能力现代化的重要抓手。如何客观、公正评价“十三五”时期新发展理念下地方政府的治理效率,对于实现“十四五”治理效能新提升具有重要意义。当前对于地方政府“尽力而为”提升治理效率关注较多,而对各地在发展不平衡情况下的治理努力关注不足。基于此,构建MINC-U-DEA模型进行研究,既能体现地方政府在中央新发展理念下的治理努力,又能对地方政府“初始禀赋”下的“量力而行”给予肯定。通过对全国31省（市、区）和八大综合经济区的实证分析,结果显示：考虑“初始禀赋”差异,大西北地区的政府治理努力被有效测量,南部沿海地区政府治理效率更多受益于经济发展;“十三五”时期全国绿色发展取得显著成就,而在创新发展方面各大区域均有待增强;政府治理效率区域差异较大,不同区域在“量力而行”的基础上,“尽力而为”提升政府治理效率路径并不相同;此外,立足自身实际,同一区域内各省（市、区）的绩效努力也不一致,内部差异最明显的是大西北地区,大西南地区差异最小。

关键词: 政府治理效率, 新发展理念, DEA模型, 初始禀赋, 八大综合经济区

Abstract: The improvement of government governance efficiency is an important starting point to promote the establishment of governance system and the modernization of governance capacity. How to objectively and fairly evaluate the governance efficiency of local governments under the new development concept during the“13th Five-Year Plan”period is of great significance for the realization of the new improvement of the governance efficiency during the“14th Five-Year Plan”period. At present, more attention is paid to local governments'“doing their best”to improve governance efficiency, but less attention is paid to the governance efforts of local governments under the situation of unbalanced development. Based on this, this paper constructs a MINC-U-DEA model to carry out a study that can not only reflect the governance efforts of the local governments under the new development concept of the Party center, but also affirm the local governments'“doing within their capabilities”under the“initial endowment”. Through an empirical analysis of 31 provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) and the eight comprehensive economic zones in China, it is found that, considering the differences in the“initial endowments”, the governments' governance efforts in the greater northwest region can be effectively measured, and the government governance efficiency in the southern coastal regions benefits more from the economic development.During the“13th Five-Year Plan”period, the country has made remarkable achievements in green development, but all the regions need to be strengthened in terms of innovation and development. The regional differences in the efficiency of government governance are relatively larger, and different regions have different ways to “do their best”to improve the government governance efficiency on the basis of“doing within their capabilities”. In addition, based on their own reality, the performance efforts of the provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions) in their same region are also inconsistent. The most obvious internal difference is found in the northwest region, and the difference in the southwest region is the smallest.

Key words: government governance efficiency, new development concept, DEA, initial endowment, the eight comprehensive economic zones

中图分类号:

D630

段培新, 孟溦. 新发展理念下的政府治理效率评价：“尽力而为”还是“量力而行”[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2022, 0(4): 22-34.

DUAN Pei-xin, MENG Wei. Evaluation of Government Governance Efficiency under the New Development Concept:“Do One'sBest”or“Do According to One's Ability”[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2022, 0(4): 22-34.

参考文献

[1] 高翔. 政府治理效率: 当代中国公共管理研究中的大问题[J]. 公共管理与政策评论,2020,(1):55-62.
[2] 郁建兴,高翔. 地方发展型政府的行为逻辑及制度基础[J]. 中国社会科学,2012,(5):95-112+206-207.
[3] Rothstein B., Teorell J.What is Quality of government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions[J]. Governance, 2010, 21(2): 165-190.
[4] 贾宁,韩立彬,彭冲. 政府治理效率价值几何?——基于上海市城市治理微观数据的实证分析[J]. 公共管理评论,2021,(1):25-46.
[5] Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444.
[6] Joe Z.Data Envelopment Analysis: A Handbook of Empirical Studies and Applications[M]. Switzerland: Springer, 2016.
[7] Doumpos M., Cohen S.Applying Data Envelopment Analysis on Accounting Data to Assess and Optimize the Efficiency of Greek Local Governments[J]. Omega, 2014, (46): 74-85.
[8] Kluza K.Risk Aassessment of the Local Government Sector Based on the Ratio Analysis and the DEA Method: Evidence from Poland[J]. Eurasian Economic Review, 2017, 7(3): 329-351.
[9] 陈诗一,张军. 中国地方政府财政支出效率研究:1978—2005[J]. 中国社会科学,2008,(4):65-78+206.
[10] 杜传忠,张丽. 多重目标约束下我国省级地方政府效率评价——基于偏好型DEA模型的实证分析[J]. 中国经济问题,2015,(6):15-25.
[11] 汪彬,郭贝贝,李鸿磊. 区域差异、规模分布与中国城市效率问题研究——基于285个地级市的实证研究[J]. 经济问题探索,2020,(1):114-127.
[12] Inhee S.,Yonghee K.,Jeongil C.Assessment of Efficiency in Public Service——Focused on Government 3.0 Case in Korea[J]. Total Quality Management& Business Excellence, 2018, 29(9-10): 1161-1184.
[13] Pérez L.G., Prior D., Zafra G. Temporal Scale Efficiency in DEA Panel Data Estimations: An Application to the Solid Waste Disposal Service in Spain[J]. Omega, 2018, 76: 18-27.
[14] 龚锋. 地方公共安全服务供给效率评估——基于四阶段DEA和Bootstrapped DEA的实证研究[J]. 管理世界,2008,(4):80-90.
[15] 李方毅,郑垂勇. 我国省级政府公共服务绩效评估研究[J]. 南京社会科学,2020,(7):26-33.
[16] 王巍,路春艳,吴刚,曹文佳. 我国地方政府行政效率评价分析——以DEA方法为工具[J]. 中国管理科学,2014,(S1):591-596.
[17] 周子超. 中国省级政府医疗卫生支出效率及其影响因素研究——基于新冠疫情背景下的反思[J]. 经济问题探索,2021,(2):49-65.
[18] 温婷,罗良清. 中国乡村环境污染治理效率及其区域差异——基于三阶段超效率SBM-DEA模型的实证检验[J]. 江西财经大学学报,2021,(3):79-90.
[19] 李文,过文浩,夏海力,张同建. 区域一体化背景下城市群产业生态效率及其时空跃迁特征[J].贵州财经大学学报,2020,(4):61-68.
[20] Fried H.O., Lovell C. A. K., Schmidt S. S., Yaisawarng S. Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2002, 17(1/2): 157-174.
[21] Yin Y.J., Cao Y. F., Tang B. J. Fairness of China's Provincial Energy Environment Efficiency Evaluation: Empirical Analysis Using A Three-stage Data Envelopment Analysis Model[J]. Natural Hazards, 2019, 95(1): 343-362.
[22] 陈弘,周贤君,胡扬名. 后精准扶贫阶段农村精准扶贫综合绩效提升研究——基于4省38市数据的实证分析[J]. 中国行政管理,2019,(11):12-18.
[23] Cooper W.W., Seiford L. M., Tone K. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models Applications, References and DEA- Solver Software[M]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
[24] 孟溦,张大群,刘文斌. 多层次结构DEA模型及其应用[J]. 中国管理科学,2008,(4):148-154.
[25] Liu W.B., Zhang D. Q., Meng W. A Study of DEA Models without Explicit Inputs[J]. Omega, 2011, 39(5): 472-480.
[26] 李旭辉,朱启贵,夏万军,李认认. 基于五大发展理念的经济社会发展评价体系研究——基于二次加权因子分析法[J]. 数理统计与管理,2019,(3):506-518.
[27] 黎新伍,徐书彬. 基于新发展理念的农业高质量发展水平测度及其空间分布特征研究[J]. 江西财经大学学报,2020,(6):78-94.
[28] 方若楠,吕延方,崔兴华. 中国八大综合经济区高质量发展测度及差异比较[J]. 经济问题探索,2021,(2):111-120.