江西财经大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 138-148.

• 法与经济 • 上一篇    

互联网金融“信息服务型”监管模式构建研究

许恋天   

  1. 武汉大学 法学院, 湖北 武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-30 修回日期:2021-03-20 出版日期:2021-05-25 发布日期:2021-06-09
  • 作者简介:许恋天,武汉大学博士研究生,主要从事财税金融法研究,联系方式xuliantian@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目“系统重要性金融科技公司的法律规制”(20CFX062); 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“风险防范视域下金融科技应用的监管对策研究”(18YJC820083)

Research on the Construction of “Information Service Type” Supervision Model of Internet Finance

XU Lian-tian   

  1. Wuhan University, Wuhan 430070, China
  • Received:2020-12-30 Revised:2021-03-20 Online:2021-05-25 Published:2021-06-09

摘要: 互联网金融监管的重难点在于应对市场信息不对称风险,而现有监管方式的有效性并未充分彰显,以信息披露为主的“信息规制型”监管模式亦难解决根本问题。信息是网络时代公共服务的重要内容,互联网金融监管者的信息服务愈发凸显。立足于“服务型监管”方式创新,互联网金融监管者应树立信息服务者身份,通过提供信息服务矫正市场信息资源配置偏差,组织协调多边主体解决信息不对称难题。互联网金融“信息服务型”监管模式,秉持市场主导信息资源配置、监管矫正信息配置缺陷的思路,以规范市场中的各类信息为服务内容,以市场各边主体为服务对象,以提供事前的信息披露咨询、事中的信息过滤维护、事后的信息纠察追责为服务手段,辅之以多边信息博弈机制、多元信息激励机制以及信息主体责任机制,从而经由全面的信息治理推动互联网金融市场健康发展。

关键词: 互联网金融, 信息不对称, "信息服务型"监管, 信息共享

Abstract: The key difficulty in Internet financial supervision is to deal with the risk of market information asymmetry, but the effectiveness of the existing regulatory methods has not been demonstrated, and the “information regulation” supervision mode dominated by information disclosure is also difficult to fundamentally solve the problem. Information is the important content of public services in the Internet era, and the information services of Internet financial regulators are also becoming more prominent. Based on the innovation of the methods of the “service-oriented supervision”, Internet financial regulators should also establish the identity of information service providers, correct market information resource allocation defects through providing information services, and organize and coordinate multilateral entities to solve the problem of information asymmetry. The “information service-type” supervision mode of Internet finance should adhere to the market-oriented allocation of information resources and the notion of supervising and correcting the defects of information allocation. The service contents should be regulating various types of information in the market, the service objects should be all the parties in the market, and the service means should be providing information disclosure and consultation before the event, providing information filtering and maintenance during the event, and providing information picketing and accountability after the event, which is supplemented by multilateral information game mechanism, multiple information incentive mechanism and information subject responsibility mechanism, so as to promote the healthy development of the Internet financial market through comprehensive information governance.

Key words: Internet finance, information asymmetry, "information service-type" supervision, information sharing

中图分类号: