江西财经大学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (04): 111-.

• • 上一篇    

新《个人所得税法》中所得认定条款探讨

李乔彧   

  1. (厦门大学 法学院,福建 厦门 361005)
  • 发布日期:2021-01-21
  • 作者简介:李乔彧,厦门大学国际税法与比较税制研究中心研究人员,维也纳经济大学奥地利税法与国际税法研究所访问学者,博士,主要从事财税法学研究,联系方式liqiaoyutax@163.com。

Discussion on the Terms of Recognition in the New Individual Income Tax Law

LI Qiao-yu   

  • Published:2021-01-21

摘要: 为了实现对收入的普遍课征,国务院财政部门通过适用“经国务院财政部门确定征税的其他所得”这一兜底条款,填补《个人所得税法》在所得认定中的法律漏洞,形成了“财政部门+兜底条款”的漏洞填补模式。在立法删除前述条款后,财政部门虽可通过扩大适用“偶然所得”条款延续前述模式,但因其适用效果有悖于此次税制改革理念,故应诉诸新的模式。新的模式应当以两种漏洞的不同特征和填补主体的正当性构成为依据,建构能够同时落实税收法定和公平原则的不同路径。具体而言,税目欠缺型漏洞仅应由立法者以修法方式补充;概念界定局限型漏洞的填补应采用“财政部门+税目条款”模式,并从基准控制、程序控制、立法控制三个方面完善监督机制。

关键词: 个人所得税法,立法修订,漏洞补充,所得认定,税收法定原则

Abstract: In order to realize the general levy on income, the financial department of the State Council has filled the legal loopholes in the identification of income of the Individual Income Tax Law through the application of the save clause of “the other incomes determined by the financial department of the State Council”, so as to form a loophole filling model of “the financial departments + the save clause”. After the deletion of the above-mentioned provisions through legislation, although the financial departments can continue the aforementioned model by expanding the application of the “accidental income”clause, they should resort to the new model, because the application effect of the old is contrary to the concept of the tax reform. The new model should be based on the different characteristics of the two loopholes and the legitimacy of the filling subject, so as to construct different paths that can simultaneously implement the principles of tax statutory and fairness. Specifically, the tax-deficient loophole should only be filled by the legislators in the way of revision, while the limited loophole of concept definition should be filled with the “financial department + tax item clause” model, and supervision mechanism should be perfected from the three aspects of benchmark control, program control and legislative control.

Key words: personal income tax law; legislative amendments; loophole filling; income recognition; taxation statutory principle