农村一二三产业融合：农户参与及其增收效应研究

江西财经大学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 103-116.

农村一二三产业融合：农户参与及其增收效应研究

李姣媛¹, 覃诚², 方向明²

1.浙江工商大学金融学院,浙江杭州 310018;
2.中国农业大学经济管理学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2020-02-26 修回日期:2020-07-13 出版日期:2020-09-25 发布日期:2020-11-03
通讯作者: 方向明,中国农业大学教授,博士生导师,主要从事农业经济与农村发展研究,联系方式xmfang@cau.edu.cn。
作者简介:李姣媛,浙江工商大学讲师,主要从事农业经济与农村发展研究;覃诚,中国农业大学博士研究生,主要从事农业经济理论与政策研究。
基金资助:
农业农村部农业财政资助研究项目“乡村产业融合发展典型模式及经验研究”

Integration of the Three Industries in Rural Areas：Rural Households' Participation and Its Income-Increasing Effects

LI Jiao-yuan¹, QIN Cheng², FANG Xiang-ming²

1. Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018;
2. China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2020-02-26 Revised:2020-07-13 Online:2020-09-25 Published:2020-11-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 农户参与三产融合的增收效应是评估农村三产融合发展效果的重要方面。基于2019年对浙江、湖北、四川3省714户农户实地调查数据分析农户三产融合参与情况,运用Logit模型探究农户参与三产融合的影响因素,采用倾向得分匹配法（PSM）评估三产融合参与对农户收入的影响效应。研究结果表明,户主受教育水平、家庭社会资本、是否为新型农业经营主体、村庄产业发展相关经济基础设施水平和所在地区等是农户参与三产融合的主要诱因。参与三产融合使农户家庭人均经营性收入显著提升164.7%,但对其他类型的收入没有显著影响。相比其他群体,参与三产融合对户主年龄在45岁及以上、受教育程度为高中及以上的农户和没有注册成为新型农业经营主体的普通农户家庭人均经营性收入的影响效应更为显著。

关键词: 农村三产融合, 基础设施, 农户收入, 倾向得分匹配法

Abstract: The income-increasing effect of rural households' participation in the integration of the three industries is one of the important aspects in evaluating the effects of the integrated development of the three industries in rural areas. Based on the survey data of 714 rural households from Zhejiang, Hubei, and Sichuan provinces in 2019, this paper tries to analyze the participation of rural households in the integration of the three industries. It makes use of the Logit model to explore the influencing factors of the participation and employs the propensity score matching method (PSM) to evaluate the effects of the participation on farmers' income. The results show that such factors as the education the head of a household received, family's social capital, whether a family being the subject of the new-type agricultural operation, the level of economic infrastructures related to the development of village industries, and the location are the major causes to the households' participation in the integration of the three industries. The participation has significantly increased the per capita operational income by 164.7%, but no significant effect can be found on the income of other types. Compared with other groups, the participation has a more significant effect on the per capita operational income of the rural households with the heads aged 45 or above, the households with education level of high school or over, and the ordinary households not registered as subjects of new agricultural operation.

Key words: integration of three industries in rural areas, infrastructure, rural household income, propensity score method

中图分类号:

F304.3

李姣媛, 覃诚, 方向明. 农村一二三产业融合：农户参与及其增收效应研究[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2020, 0(5): 103-116.

LI Jiao-yuan, QIN Cheng, FANG Xiang-ming. Integration of the Three Industries in Rural Areas：Rural Households' Participation and Its Income-Increasing Effects[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2020, 0(5): 103-116.

参考文献

[1] Rosenberg N.Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840—1910[J]. The Journal of Economic History, 1963, 23(4): 414-443.
[2] Duysters G., Hagedoorn J.Technological Convergence in the IT Industry: the Role of Strategic Technology Alliances and Technological Competencies[J]. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 1998, 5(3): 355-368.
[3] Hacklin F., Marxt C., Fahrni F.An Evolutionary Perspective on Convergence: Inducing a Stage Model of Inter-industry Innovation[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2010, 49(1-3): 220-249.
[4] 姜长云. 推进农村产业融合的主要模式及其对农民增收的影响[J]. 农业经济与管理,2017,(4):5-10+36.
[5] 郭军, 张效榕, 孔祥智. 农村一二三产业融合与农民增收——基于河南省农村一二三产业融合案例[J]. 农业经济问题, 2019,(3):135-144.
[6] 唐福军. 农村三产融合发展水平及其对农村经济增长的影响趋势研究[D]. 大连:东北财经大学, 2018.
[7] 徐舒婷. 农村一二三产业融合对农民增收的影响研究[D]. 杭州:浙江财经大学, 2018.
[8] 唐超, 胡宜挺, 冀一凡. 农村产业融合的收入效应分析——来自北京市的经验数据[J]. 新疆农垦经济, 2016,(11):12-19.
[9] 姜卓简, 范静, 黄婧玉. 农户参与农村产业融合的意愿及其影响因素——基于集安市人参产业融合的调查分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版)2018,(6):37-42.
[10] 杨久栋, 马彪, 彭超. 新型农业经营主体从事融合型产业的影响因素分析——基于全国农村固定观察点的调查数据[J]. 农业技术经济, 2019,(9):105-113.
[11] 李云新, 戴紫芸, 丁士军. 农村一二三产业融合的农户增收效应研究——基于对345个农户调查的PSM分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(4):37-44+146-147.
[12] 杨晶, 丁士军. 农村产业融合视角下的农户收入结构差异分析及其政策含义——来自湖北微观调查的证据[J]. 西部论坛, 2019,(4):97-108.
[13] 曾福生, 蔡保忠. 农村基础设施是实现乡村振兴战略的基础[J]. 农业经济问题, 2018,(7):88-95.
[14] 侯晶, 应瑞瑶, 周力. 契约农业能有效提高农户的收入吗?——以肉鸡养殖户为例[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018,(3):122-132+156.
[15] Chen Y., Li S.X. Group Identity and Social Preferences[J]. American Economic Review, 2009, 99(1): 431-457.
[16] 周广肃, 谭华清, 李力行. 外出务工经历有益于返乡农民工创业吗?[J]. 经济学(季刊),2017,(2):793-814.
[17] 徐超, 吴玲萍, 孙文平. 外出务工经历、社会资本与返乡农民工创业——来自CHIPS数据的证据[J]. 财经研究,2017,(12):30-44.
[18] 钱文荣, 应一逍. 农户参与农村公共基础设施供给的意愿及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国农村经济,2014,(11):39-51.
[19] 刘斐, 蔡洁, 李晓静, 夏显力. 农村一二三产业融合的个体响应及影响因素[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019,(4):142-149.
[20] 王蕾, 杜栋, 郭志勤, 马海良. 农田水利设施供给水平、农户需求意愿与供给效果[J]. 经济问题,2016,(2): 97-102.
[21] Heckman J.J., Vytlacil E. J. Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs, Part II: Using the Marginal Treatment Effect to Organize Alternative Econometric Estimators to Evaluate Social Programs, and to Forecast their Effects in New Environments[J]. Handbook of Econometrics, 2007, 6b(7): 4875-5143.
[22] 刘展. 基于倾向得分广义线性模型的非概率抽样统计推断研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识,2018,(16):175-184.
[23] 王慧玲, 孔荣. 正规借贷促进农村居民家庭消费了吗?——基于PSM方法的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济,2019,(8):72-90.
[24] 王瑜. 电商参与提升农户经济获得感了吗?——贫困户与非贫困户的差异[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019,(7):37-50.