江西财经大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (4): 57-67.

• 经济管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国管理学自主知识体系建构:中国管理学、中国管理学术共同体与中国管理学派

吕力   

  1. 扬州大学,江苏 扬州 225009
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-08 修回日期:2026-05-07 出版日期:2026-07-25 发布日期:2026-07-27
  • 作者简介:吕力,扬州大学教授,博士生导师,经济学博士,主要从事管理哲学研究,联系方式linus.lu@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国传统管理哲学研究”(24&ZD221)

Constructing an Independent Knowledge System for Chinese Management Studies: Chinese Management Studies, Chinese Management Academic Community, and Chinese Management Schools

Lv Li   

  1. Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
  • Received:2026-01-08 Revised:2026-05-07 Online:2026-07-25 Published:2026-07-27

摘要: 中国管理学自主知识体系的核心与主体是中国管理学本身——它不是依附性的情境管理,而是与西方管理学不完全通约性的自主范式。这种不完全通约性,根植于二者在根本性价值预设、问题意识和评价标准上的结构性差异。不完全通约性既保障了中国管理学的自主性,又不否认彼此沟通、比较与借鉴的可能。构建中国管理学自主知识体系的首要前提,是中国管理学术界对中国管理学主体性的自觉认同与共同追求;而其坚实根基,则在于形成一个具有共同使命、自觉推动理论创新的中国管理学术共同体。构建中国管理学自主知识体系必须突破对中层理论累积成体系的西方主流观念的依赖,重返宏大理论场域,从中华优秀传统文化与中国式现代化实践中,提炼自身的核心假设、元理论和总体分析框架。中国管理学派的提出与实践,为范式、方法论和学术共同体转型提供了关键性突破口:它以实存的成果将宏大的自主体系展现出来,使共同体转型具象化为围绕各学派展开的学习、批判、对话与再创造的渐进过程。

关键词: 中国管理学自主知识体系, 中国管理学, 中国管理学术共同体, 中国管理学派, 宏大理论

Abstract: The core and subject of the independent knowledge system in Chinese management is Chinese management itself—it is not a dependent situational management, but an autonomous paradigm that is not fully compatible with Western management. This incomplete universality is rooted in the structural differences between the two in fundamental value assumptions, problem awareness, and evaluation criteria. The incomplete universality not only ensures the autonomy of Chinese management studies, but also does not deny the possibility of communication, comparison, and reference between each other. The primary prerequisite for building an independent knowledge system of Chinese management is the conscious recognition and common pursuit of the subjectivity of Chinese management by the Chinese management academic community; and its solid foundation lies in forming a Chinese management academic community with a common mission and a conscious drive for theoretical innovation. To construct the independent knowledge system of Chinese management science, we must break through the dependence on the western mainstream concepts accumulated from the middle theory, return to the grand theoretical field, and refine our own core assumptions, meta theory and overall analytical framework from the excellent traditional Chinese culture and the practice of Chinese path to modernization. The proposal and practice of the Chinese management school provide a key breakthrough for the transformation of paradigms, methodologies, and academic communities: It presents a grand autonomous system with tangible results, making the transformation of the community concrete as a gradual process of learning, criticism, dialogue, and recreation around each school.

Key words: independent knowledge system of Chinese management studies, Chinese management studies, Chinese management academic community, Chinese management schools, grand theory

中图分类号: