智慧健康养老产品能否让老年人“感觉更年轻”——来自老年社会追踪调查的证据

江西财经大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (1): 75-87.

智慧健康养老产品能否让老年人“感觉更年轻”——来自老年社会追踪调查的证据

张硕¹, 赵明¹, 胡浩钰²

1.中国人民大学人口与健康学院,北京 100872;
2.华南农业大学经济管理学院,广东广州 510642

收稿日期:2025-09-29 修回日期:2025-11-05 出版日期:2026-01-25 发布日期:2026-02-09
通讯作者: 赵明,中国人民大学博士研究生,主要从事养老保障与老龄社会治理研究,联系方式 mingzhao1020@ruc.edu.cn。
作者简介:张硕,中国人民大学博士研究生,主要从事老年健康与养老服务研究;胡浩钰,华南农业大学副教授,管理学博士,主要从事机器人应用与养老保障研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目“代际差异视角下生育政策调整的福利效应及保障策略研究”（72504094）

Can Smart and Healthy Elderly Care Products Make Seniors “Feel Younger”? Evidences from the Longitudinal Survey of the Aging Society

Zhang Shuo¹, Zhao Ming¹, Hu Hao-yu²

1. Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872;
2. South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China

Received:2025-09-29 Revised:2025-11-05 Online:2026-01-25 Published:2026-02-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在数智化与老龄化深度叠加的背景下,推动智慧健康养老产品高质量发展是实现健康养老数字化转型、发展银发经济和提升老年人生活质量的重要举措。基于2018—2023年中国老年社会追踪调查三期面板数据,实证考察了智慧健康养老产品对老年人老化年龄认同的影响。研究表明,智慧健康养老产品能够显著改善老年人的老化年龄认同,这一效应在中低龄、女性、城镇以及自评健康状况较好的老年群体中更为显著。中介效应检验发现,智慧健康养老产品能够通过增强个体的自我效能感和促进社会参与,间接促进积极老化年龄认同的形成。进一步分析表明,健康管理类和养老监护类智能产品在塑造积极老化年龄认同方面具有显著正向作用,且产品使用存在明显的“叠加效应”,产品使用数量越多,老年人的老化年龄认同越积极。因此,在推进智慧健康养老示范试点的过程中,应从供需两端协同发力,在推动供给侧产业链建设和产品供给质量提升的同时,加强需求侧老年人产品使用意识和数字素养的提升。

关键词: 智慧健康养老产品, 老化年龄认同, 自我效能, 社会参与

Abstract: Against the backdrop of deep integration between digital intelligence and aging, promoting the high-quality development of smart and healthy elderly care products is a crucial measure to achieve the digital transformation of elderly care, foster the silver economy, and enhance the quality of life for the elderly. Based on the three phases of panel data from the China Aging Social Tracking Survey (2018-2023), this study empirically examines the impact of smart and healthy elderly care products on older adults' aging age identity. The findings reveal that such products can significantly improve the aging age identity among the elderly, with more pronounced effects among middle-aged and low-aged groups, women, urban residents, and those with better self-rated health. The mediation effect tests indicate that smart and healthy elderly care products can indirectly promote the formation of the positive aging age identity by enhancing individuals' self-efficacy and fostering social participation. Further analysis shows that health management and elderly care monitoring smart products play a significant positive role in shaping positive aging age identity, with a clear“cumulative effect”—the more products used, the more positive the aging age identity of the elderly. Therefore, in advancing the demonstration and pilot projects of smart and healthy elderly care, efforts should be coordinated on both supply and demand sides. While promoting the construction of the supply-side industrial chain and improving product quality, it is essential to strengthen the elderly's awareness of product usage and digital literacy on the demand side.

Key words: smart elderly care products, aging age identification, self-efficacy, social participation

中图分类号:

张硕, 赵明, 胡浩钰. 智慧健康养老产品能否让老年人“感觉更年轻”——来自老年社会追踪调查的证据[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2026, 0(1): 75-87.

Zhang Shuo, Zhao Ming, Hu Hao-yu. Can Smart and Healthy Elderly Care Products Make Seniors “Feel Younger”? Evidences from the Longitudinal Survey of the Aging Society[J]. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2026, 0(1): 75-87.

参考文献

[1] 程新峰, 姜全保. 隔代照料与老年人年龄认同:子女代际支持的中介效应[J]. 人口学刊, 2019, (3): 63-76.
[2] 丁百仁, 王毅杰. 老年人社会参与模式对老化态度的影响[J]. 北京社会科学, 2025, (5): 114-128.
[3] 顾大男. 老年人年龄界定和重新界定的思考[J]. 中国人口科学, 2000, (3): 42-51.
[4] 郭凯, 黄谦. “不服老”从何而来?体育锻炼对中国老年人老化年龄认同的作用路径探讨[J]. 体育学研究, 2025, (3): 65-79.
[5] 胡泽鹏. 数字时代推进物质文明和精神文明相协调的政治经济学分析[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2025, (3): 13-22.
[6] 倪晨旭, 汤佳, 邵宝魁, 等. 智能穿戴设备与老年健康——来自智能手环的证据[J]. 人口学刊, 2023, (6): 50-67.
[7] 王立剑, 金蕾. 愿意抑或意愿:失能老人使用智慧养老产品态度研究[J]. 西北大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2021, (5): 89-97.
[8] 姚兴安, 苏群, 朱萌君, 等. 银色浪潮下的智慧养老与老人健康[J]. 社会发展研究, 2021, (4): 181-195+242-243.
[9] 于潇, 王琪汇. 中国老年人老化年龄认同与就业选择[J]. 经济学动态, 2023, (9): 92-110.
[10] 张莉, 陈凯, 李汉君. 数字经济赋能制造业产业链韧性: 多维机制与空间溢出[J]. 江西财经大学学报, 2025, (1): 35-47.
[11] 钟仁耀, 蔡天欣, 马仕龙. 智能养老产品能提升老年人心理健康吗?——来自中国老年社会追踪调查的证据[J]. 人口与发展, 2025, (2): 116-126.
[12] Bandura A.Organisational applications of social cognitive theory[J]. Australian Journal of Management, 1998, 13(2): 275-302.
[13] Barak B, Stern B.Subjective age correlates: A research note[J]. The Gerontologist, 1986, 26(5): 571-578.
[14] Barrett A E, Barbee H.The subjective life course framework: Integrating life course sociology with gerontological perspectives on subjective aging[J]. Advances in Life Course Research, 2022, 51: 100448.
[15] Chen C, Ding S, Wang J.Digital health for aging populations[J]. Nature Medicine, 2023, 29(7): 1623-1630.
[16] Kotter-Grühn D, Kornadt A E, Stephan Y.Looking beyond chronological age: Current knowledge and future directions in the study of subjective age[J]. Gerontology, 2015, 62(1): 86-93.
[17] Lei L, Yu D, Zhou Y.Better educated children, better Internet-connected elderly parents[J]. Research Policy, 2023, 52(4): 104743.
[18] Li L, Jin G, Guo Y, et al.Internet access, support, usage divides, and depressive symptoms among older adults in China: a nationally representative cross-sectional study[J]. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2023, 323: 514-523.
[19] Rubin D C, Berntsen D.People over forty feel 20% younger than their age: Subjective age across the lifespan[J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2006, 13(5): 776-780.
[20] Rushton P W, Kairy D, Archambault P, et al.The potential impact of intelligent power wheelchair use on social participation: perspectives of users, caregivers and clinicians[J]. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2014, 10(3): 191-197.
[21] Shaban-Nejad A, Lavigne M, Okhmatovskaia A, et al.PopHRL: A knowledge-based platform to support integration, analysis, and visualization of population population health data[J]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2017, 1387(1): 44-53.
[22] Stephan Y, Sutin A R, Terracciano A.How old do you feel? The role of age discrimination and biological aging in subjective age[J]. PloS one, 2015, 10(3): e0119293.
[23] Westerhof G J, Nehrkorn-Bailey A M, Tseng H Y, et al. Longitudinal effects of subjective aging on health and longevity: An updated meta-analysis[J]. Psychology and Aging, 2023, 38(3): 147.
[24] Xie Z, Yadav S, Jo A.The association between electronic wearable devices and self-efficacy for managing health: A cross sectional study using 2019 HINTS data[J]. Health and Technology, 2021, 11(2): 331-339.
[25] Zhang H, He R.A study on digital inclusion of Chinese rural older adults from a life course perspective[J]. Frontiers in Public Health, 2022, 10: 974998.