江西财经大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (2): 100-110.

• 法与经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

个人破产试点地区的自由财产制度:规则比较及启示

张丽琴   

  1. 汕头大学 法学院,广东 汕头 515063
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-15 修回日期:2025-03-04 出版日期:2025-03-25 发布日期:2025-03-26
  • 作者简介:张丽琴,汕头大学教授,法学博士,主要从事破产法与公司法研究,联系方式757460362@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目“数字社会的法律治理体系与立法变革研究”(20&ZD178); 汕头大学科研启动经费项目“中国式个人破产制度构建研究”(STF25001T)

The Free Property System in the Pilot Areas of Personal Bankruptcy: Rule Comparison and Enlightenment

Zhang Li-qin   

  1. Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
  • Received:2024-02-15 Revised:2025-03-04 Online:2025-03-25 Published:2025-03-26

摘要: 各地文件从财产类型、价值限制与确定程序三方面规范自由财产问题。确定财产类型时,无论采取纯概括式、纯列举式,还是列举式+概括式的地区,其文件都明确生活必需品与费用、特定人格物以及专属债权是债务人的基本生存保障;在主张自由财产应包含债务人发展所需物品的地方,文件还把“因职业发展需要必须保留的物品或合理费用”列入其中。在价值限制上,部分文件笼统地把经济价值较大的生活必需品和人格物排除在外,还有部分文件对生活必需品的单项价值和自由财产的总价值进行限定。对确定程序,一般由债务人列出清单,经管理人调查核实、债权人会议决议通过后,由法院裁定执行,但对债权人会议未予通过的自由财产清单,不同试点的处理方式差异较大。各地自由财产制度以保障债务人生存权为基础,尊重债权人意愿,确定程序相似;但价值限制不明确,确定过程协商性不足,也缺乏适时调整的灵活性。统一个人破产立法中的自由财产制度应注重法定性与意定性、确定性与灵活性的结合,使自由财产在种类和价值限制上更具明确性和可操作性,并根据特殊需要实施动态调整。

关键词: 个人破产, 自由财产, 生存发展权益

Abstract: The documents in various regions regulate the issues of free property from three aspects: property type, value restriction and determination procedure. When determining the property type, whether they adopt pure enumeration, pure generalization, or enumeration+ generalization, the documents clearly define necessities and expenses, specific personal property and exclusive creditor’s rights as the debtor’s basic survival guarantee. In the places where the free property should include items needed for the development of the debtor, the documents also include such statement as “items or reasonable expenses that must be retained due to the needs of career development”. In terms of value restriction, some documents generally exclude necessities and personal property with greater economic value, and some documents limit the individual value of necessities and the total value of free property. For the determination procedure, the debtor generally makes the list, and after the manager investigates and verifies it, and the creditors’ meeting passes the resolution, then it is submitted to the court for execution. However, for the free property list that the creditors’ meeting does not pass, the treatment methods of different pilots differ greatly. The free property system in various regions is based on the protection of the debtor’s right to live, which respects the will of the creditors, and the determination procedures are similar. However, the value restriction is not clear, the determination process is not sufficiently consultative, and the flexibility of timely adjustment is lacking. The free property system in the unified personal bankruptcy legislation should focus on the combination of legality and intentionality, certainty and flexibility, so as to make the free property more clear and operable in terms of types and value restrictions, and the implementation of dynamic adjustments should be carried out according to special needs.

Key words: personal bankruptcy, free property, survival and development rights

中图分类号: